| Summary: | The paper is related to an interesting case of revision of X-ray crystal structure with a lack of experimental data. Complexes V<sub>4</sub>OSe<sub>8</sub>I<sub>6</sub>·X (X = I<sub>2</sub> or 3,5-dimethylpyrazole) with O-centered complex molecules [V<sub>4</sub>O(μ-Se<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>I<sub>4</sub>(μ-I)<sub>2</sub>] were synthesized in our group. In the further search for new relative compounds in the V-Se-I-O system, we obtained several crystals with different structures, including “V<sub>4</sub>OSe<sub>6</sub>I<sub>3</sub>”, with incredibly complicated connectivity of {V<sub>4</sub>O(Se<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>I<sub>6</sub>} units bridged via both diselenide and iodide ligands. Due to the absence of phase-pure products and the possible instability of some of the phases under ambient conditions, we were mainly guided by the single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. However, seeing a very complex coordination mode in the “V<sub>4</sub>OSe<sub>6</sub>I<sub>3</sub>” structure, we have carefully analyzed the structure from the positions of symmetry and chemical synthesis in this system. The “new structure” was recognized as the complex superposition of the structure of another compound with composition “V<sub>4</sub>OSe<sub>6</sub>I<sub>10</sub>” just found in the same experiment. We outlined the course of observations, reasoning and solutions to the symmetry false estimation problem, which we believe to be of interest to readers dealing with X-ray diffraction analysis.
|
|---|