Benefit of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients with Different Etiologies

(1) Background: A plethora of studies have elucidated the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) for patients afflicted with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, the literature on the benefits of CA in the specific etio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Songbing Long, Yuanjun Sun, Xianjie Xiao, Zhongzhen Wang, Wei Sun, Lianjun Gao, Yunlong Xia, Xiaomeng Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/10/437
_version_ 1797573463610753024
author Songbing Long
Yuanjun Sun
Xianjie Xiao
Zhongzhen Wang
Wei Sun
Lianjun Gao
Yunlong Xia
Xiaomeng Yin
author_facet Songbing Long
Yuanjun Sun
Xianjie Xiao
Zhongzhen Wang
Wei Sun
Lianjun Gao
Yunlong Xia
Xiaomeng Yin
author_sort Songbing Long
collection DOAJ
description (1) Background: A plethora of studies have elucidated the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) for patients afflicted with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, the literature on the benefits of CA in the specific etiological context of heart failure (HF) remains limited. This study delineates a comparative assessment of outcomes for patients with AF and reduced LVEF across the primary etiologies. (2) Methods: Our inquiry encompassed 216 patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure and an LVEF of less than 50 percent who were referred to our institution for circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) between the years 2016 and 2020. The selection criteria included a detailed medical history while excluding those suffering from valvular disease, congenital heart disease, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In an effort to scrutinize varying etiologies, patients were stratified into three categories: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM, n = 56, 30.6%), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, n = 68, 37.2%), and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC, n = 59, 32.2%). (3) Results: Following an average (±SD) duration of 36 ± 3 months, the prevalence of sinus rhythm was 52.1% in the DCM group, 50.0% in the ICM group, and 68.14% in the TIC group (<i>p</i> = 0.014). This study revealed a significant disparity between the DCM and TIC groups (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and the ICM and TIC groups (<i>p</i> = 0.007), yet no significant distinction was discerned between the TIC and ICM groups (<i>p</i> = 0.769). Importantly, there were no significant variations in the application of antiarrhythmic drugs or recurrence of procedures among the three groups. The mortality rates were 14.29% for the DCM group and 14.71% for the ICM group, which were higher than the 3.39% observed in the TIC group (DCM vs. TIC <i>p</i> = 0.035 (HR = 4.50 (95%CI 1.38–14.67)), ICM vs. TIC <i>p</i> = 0.021 (HR = 5.00 (95%CI 1.61–15.50))). A noteworthy enhancement in heart function was evidenced in the TIC group in comparison to the DCM and ICM groups, including a higher LVEF (<i>p</i> < 0.001), diminution of LV end-diastolic diameter (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and an enhanced New York Heart Association classification (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Hospitalization rates for heart failure were discernibly lower in TIC patients (0.98 (0,2) times) relative to those with DCM (1.74 (0,3) times, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and TIC (1.78 (0,4) times, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and brief episodes were found to achieve superior clinical outcomes through a catheter ablation strategy. (4) Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with TIC demonstrated a more pronounced benefit from catheter ablation compared to those with DCM and ICM. This encompassed an augmented improvement in cardiac function, an enhanced maintenance of sinus rhythm, and a reduced mortality rate.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:10:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7cf923d29e514c65a83c68e9306b8f19
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:10:52Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
spelling doaj.art-7cf923d29e514c65a83c68e9306b8f192023-11-19T16:50:56ZengMDPI AGJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease2308-34252023-10-01101043710.3390/jcdd10100437Benefit of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients with Different EtiologiesSongbing Long0Yuanjun Sun1Xianjie Xiao2Zhongzhen Wang3Wei Sun4Lianjun Gao5Yunlong Xia6Xiaomeng Yin7Department of Cardiovascular, The Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang 422000, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China(1) Background: A plethora of studies have elucidated the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) for patients afflicted with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Nevertheless, the literature on the benefits of CA in the specific etiological context of heart failure (HF) remains limited. This study delineates a comparative assessment of outcomes for patients with AF and reduced LVEF across the primary etiologies. (2) Methods: Our inquiry encompassed 216 patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure and an LVEF of less than 50 percent who were referred to our institution for circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) between the years 2016 and 2020. The selection criteria included a detailed medical history while excluding those suffering from valvular disease, congenital heart disease, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In an effort to scrutinize varying etiologies, patients were stratified into three categories: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM, n = 56, 30.6%), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, n = 68, 37.2%), and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC, n = 59, 32.2%). (3) Results: Following an average (±SD) duration of 36 ± 3 months, the prevalence of sinus rhythm was 52.1% in the DCM group, 50.0% in the ICM group, and 68.14% in the TIC group (<i>p</i> = 0.014). This study revealed a significant disparity between the DCM and TIC groups (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and the ICM and TIC groups (<i>p</i> = 0.007), yet no significant distinction was discerned between the TIC and ICM groups (<i>p</i> = 0.769). Importantly, there were no significant variations in the application of antiarrhythmic drugs or recurrence of procedures among the three groups. The mortality rates were 14.29% for the DCM group and 14.71% for the ICM group, which were higher than the 3.39% observed in the TIC group (DCM vs. TIC <i>p</i> = 0.035 (HR = 4.50 (95%CI 1.38–14.67)), ICM vs. TIC <i>p</i> = 0.021 (HR = 5.00 (95%CI 1.61–15.50))). A noteworthy enhancement in heart function was evidenced in the TIC group in comparison to the DCM and ICM groups, including a higher LVEF (<i>p</i> < 0.001), diminution of LV end-diastolic diameter (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and an enhanced New York Heart Association classification (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Hospitalization rates for heart failure were discernibly lower in TIC patients (0.98 (0,2) times) relative to those with DCM (1.74 (0,3) times, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and TIC (1.78 (0,4) times, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and brief episodes were found to achieve superior clinical outcomes through a catheter ablation strategy. (4) Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with TIC demonstrated a more pronounced benefit from catheter ablation compared to those with DCM and ICM. This encompassed an augmented improvement in cardiac function, an enhanced maintenance of sinus rhythm, and a reduced mortality rate.https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/10/437atrial fibrillationcardiomyopathycatheter ablationpulmonary vein isolationimpaired systolic ejection fractionheart failure
spellingShingle Songbing Long
Yuanjun Sun
Xianjie Xiao
Zhongzhen Wang
Wei Sun
Lianjun Gao
Yunlong Xia
Xiaomeng Yin
Benefit of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients with Different Etiologies
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
atrial fibrillation
cardiomyopathy
catheter ablation
pulmonary vein isolation
impaired systolic ejection fraction
heart failure
title Benefit of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients with Different Etiologies
title_full Benefit of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients with Different Etiologies
title_fullStr Benefit of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients with Different Etiologies
title_full_unstemmed Benefit of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients with Different Etiologies
title_short Benefit of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients with Different Etiologies
title_sort benefit of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients with different etiologies
topic atrial fibrillation
cardiomyopathy
catheter ablation
pulmonary vein isolation
impaired systolic ejection fraction
heart failure
url https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/10/10/437
work_keys_str_mv AT songbinglong benefitofcatheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurepatientswithdifferentetiologies
AT yuanjunsun benefitofcatheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurepatientswithdifferentetiologies
AT xianjiexiao benefitofcatheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurepatientswithdifferentetiologies
AT zhongzhenwang benefitofcatheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurepatientswithdifferentetiologies
AT weisun benefitofcatheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurepatientswithdifferentetiologies
AT lianjungao benefitofcatheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurepatientswithdifferentetiologies
AT yunlongxia benefitofcatheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurepatientswithdifferentetiologies
AT xiaomengyin benefitofcatheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurepatientswithdifferentetiologies