Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities

Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) have traditionally been viewed as two separate techniques, which can both be used alongside physical practice to enhance motor learning and rehabilitation. Their independent use has been shown to be effective, and there is clear evidence that the two pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Lloyd Eaves, Martin Riach, Paul Stewart Holmes, David James Wright
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00514/full
_version_ 1819084602124271616
author Daniel Lloyd Eaves
Martin Riach
Paul Stewart Holmes
David James Wright
author_facet Daniel Lloyd Eaves
Martin Riach
Paul Stewart Holmes
David James Wright
author_sort Daniel Lloyd Eaves
collection DOAJ
description Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) have traditionally been viewed as two separate techniques, which can both be used alongside physical practice to enhance motor learning and rehabilitation. Their independent use has been shown to be effective, and there is clear evidence that the two processes can elicit similar activity in the motor system. Building on these well-established findings, research has now turned to investigate the effects of their combined use. In this article, we first review the available neurophysiological and behavioral evidence for the effects of combined action observation and motor imagery (‘AO+MI’) on motor processes. We next describe a conceptual framework for their combined use, and then discuss several areas for future research into AO+MI processes. In this review, we advocate a more integrated approach to AO+MI techniques than has previously been adopted by movement scientists and practitioners alike. We hope this early review of an emergent body of research, along with a related set of research questions, can inspire new work in this area. We are optimistic that future research will further confirm if, how, and when this combined approach to AO+MI can be more effective in motor learning and rehabilitation settings, relative to the more traditional application of AO or MI independently.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T20:51:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7cfc1a79ee764a3b8645c836798de2f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T20:51:04Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-7cfc1a79ee764a3b8645c836798de2f72022-12-21T18:50:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2016-11-011010.3389/fnins.2016.00514218214Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunitiesDaniel Lloyd Eaves0Martin Riach1Paul Stewart Holmes2David James Wright3Teesside UniversityManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchester Metropolitan UniversityMotor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) have traditionally been viewed as two separate techniques, which can both be used alongside physical practice to enhance motor learning and rehabilitation. Their independent use has been shown to be effective, and there is clear evidence that the two processes can elicit similar activity in the motor system. Building on these well-established findings, research has now turned to investigate the effects of their combined use. In this article, we first review the available neurophysiological and behavioral evidence for the effects of combined action observation and motor imagery (‘AO+MI’) on motor processes. We next describe a conceptual framework for their combined use, and then discuss several areas for future research into AO+MI processes. In this review, we advocate a more integrated approach to AO+MI techniques than has previously been adopted by movement scientists and practitioners alike. We hope this early review of an emergent body of research, along with a related set of research questions, can inspire new work in this area. We are optimistic that future research will further confirm if, how, and when this combined approach to AO+MI can be more effective in motor learning and rehabilitation settings, relative to the more traditional application of AO or MI independently.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00514/fullMotor Simulationmotor learningobservational learningmotor rehabilitationMental Practicemovement demonstrations
spellingShingle Daniel Lloyd Eaves
Martin Riach
Paul Stewart Holmes
David James Wright
Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Motor Simulation
motor learning
observational learning
motor rehabilitation
Mental Practice
movement demonstrations
title Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities
title_full Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities
title_fullStr Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities
title_short Motor imagery during action observation: A brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities
title_sort motor imagery during action observation a brief review of evidence theory and future research opportunities
topic Motor Simulation
motor learning
observational learning
motor rehabilitation
Mental Practice
movement demonstrations
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00514/full
work_keys_str_mv AT daniellloydeaves motorimageryduringactionobservationabriefreviewofevidencetheoryandfutureresearchopportunities
AT martinriach motorimageryduringactionobservationabriefreviewofevidencetheoryandfutureresearchopportunities
AT paulstewartholmes motorimageryduringactionobservationabriefreviewofevidencetheoryandfutureresearchopportunities
AT davidjameswright motorimageryduringactionobservationabriefreviewofevidencetheoryandfutureresearchopportunities