The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination

Purpose Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) were developed to identify the mastery or non-mastery of the attributes required for solving test items, but their application has been limited to very low-level attributes, and the accuracy and consistency of high-level attributes using DCMs have rare...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dong Gi Seo, Jae Kum Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-18-15.pdf
_version_ 1797763569389928448
author Dong Gi Seo
Jae Kum Kim
author_facet Dong Gi Seo
Jae Kum Kim
author_sort Dong Gi Seo
collection DOAJ
description Purpose Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) were developed to identify the mastery or non-mastery of the attributes required for solving test items, but their application has been limited to very low-level attributes, and the accuracy and consistency of high-level attributes using DCMs have rarely been reported compared with classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory models. This paper compared the accuracy of high-level attribute mastery between deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate (DINA) and Rasch models, along with sub-scores based on CTT. Methods First, a simulation study explored the effects of attribute length (number of items per attribute) and the correlations among attributes with respect to the accuracy of mastery. Second, a real-data study examined model and item fit and investigated the consistency of mastery for each attribute among the 3 models using the 2017 Korean Medical Licensing Examination with 360 items. Results Accuracy of mastery increased with a higher number of items measuring each attribute across all conditions. The DINA model was more accurate than the CTT and Rasch models for attributes with high correlations (>0.5) and few items. In the real-data analysis, the DINA and Rasch models generally showed better item fits and appropriate model fit. The consistency of mastery between the Rasch and DINA models ranged from 0.541 to 0.633 and the correlations of person attribute scores between the Rasch and DINA models ranged from 0.579 to 0.786. Conclusion Although all 3 models provide a mastery decision for each examinee, the individual mastery profile using the DINA model provides more accurate decisions for attributes with high correlations than the CTT and Rasch models. The DINA model can also be directly applied to tests with complex structures, unlike the CTT and Rasch models, and it provides different diagnostic information from the CTT and Rasch models.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T19:43:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7cfd4ce730ae48b19894af726db5a1bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1975-5937
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T19:43:20Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
record_format Article
series Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
spelling doaj.art-7cfd4ce730ae48b19894af726db5a1bf2023-08-02T03:41:27ZengKorea Health Personnel Licensing Examination InstituteJournal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions1975-59372021-07-011810.3352/jeehp.2021.18.15407The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing ExaminationDong Gi Seo0Jae Kum Kim1Department of Psychology, College of Social Science, Hallym University, Chuncheon, KoreaKorea International University in Ferghana, Ferghana, UzbekistanPurpose Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) were developed to identify the mastery or non-mastery of the attributes required for solving test items, but their application has been limited to very low-level attributes, and the accuracy and consistency of high-level attributes using DCMs have rarely been reported compared with classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory models. This paper compared the accuracy of high-level attribute mastery between deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate (DINA) and Rasch models, along with sub-scores based on CTT. Methods First, a simulation study explored the effects of attribute length (number of items per attribute) and the correlations among attributes with respect to the accuracy of mastery. Second, a real-data study examined model and item fit and investigated the consistency of mastery for each attribute among the 3 models using the 2017 Korean Medical Licensing Examination with 360 items. Results Accuracy of mastery increased with a higher number of items measuring each attribute across all conditions. The DINA model was more accurate than the CTT and Rasch models for attributes with high correlations (>0.5) and few items. In the real-data analysis, the DINA and Rasch models generally showed better item fits and appropriate model fit. The consistency of mastery between the Rasch and DINA models ranged from 0.541 to 0.633 and the correlations of person attribute scores between the Rasch and DINA models ranged from 0.579 to 0.786. Conclusion Although all 3 models provide a mastery decision for each examinee, the individual mastery profile using the DINA model provides more accurate decisions for attributes with high correlations than the CTT and Rasch models. The DINA model can also be directly applied to tests with complex structures, unlike the CTT and Rasch models, and it provides different diagnostic information from the CTT and Rasch models.http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-18-15.pdfdata collectiondata analysispsychometricsrepublic of koreastatistical models
spellingShingle Dong Gi Seo
Jae Kum Kim
The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
data collection
data analysis
psychometrics
republic of korea
statistical models
title The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination
title_full The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination
title_fullStr The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination
title_short The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination
title_sort accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the rasch and deterministic inputs noisy and gate diagnostic classification models a simulation study and a real world analysis using data from the korean medical licensing examination
topic data collection
data analysis
psychometrics
republic of korea
statistical models
url http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-18-15.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT donggiseo theaccuracyandconsistencyofmasteryforeachcontentdomainusingtheraschanddeterministicinputsnoisyandgatediagnosticclassificationmodelsasimulationstudyandarealworldanalysisusingdatafromthekoreanmedicallicensingexamination
AT jaekumkim theaccuracyandconsistencyofmasteryforeachcontentdomainusingtheraschanddeterministicinputsnoisyandgatediagnosticclassificationmodelsasimulationstudyandarealworldanalysisusingdatafromthekoreanmedicallicensingexamination
AT donggiseo accuracyandconsistencyofmasteryforeachcontentdomainusingtheraschanddeterministicinputsnoisyandgatediagnosticclassificationmodelsasimulationstudyandarealworldanalysisusingdatafromthekoreanmedicallicensingexamination
AT jaekumkim accuracyandconsistencyofmasteryforeachcontentdomainusingtheraschanddeterministicinputsnoisyandgatediagnosticclassificationmodelsasimulationstudyandarealworldanalysisusingdatafromthekoreanmedicallicensingexamination