A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER

The present study addresses the uncertainties that affect the recently performed predictions of beryllium (Be) erosion and migration in ITER using the Monte-Carlo code ERO2.0. The focus of the study is a D–T baseline discharge with fusion power gain Q=10, scrape-off layer (SOL) input power PSOL=100M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Romazanov, S. Brezinsek, R.A. Pitts, A. Kirschner, A. Eksaeva, D. Borodin, E. Veshchev, V.S. Neverov, A.B. Kukushkin, A.G. Alekseev, Ch. Linsmeier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Nuclear Materials and Energy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235217912100003X
_version_ 1818624482618638336
author J. Romazanov
S. Brezinsek
R.A. Pitts
A. Kirschner
A. Eksaeva
D. Borodin
E. Veshchev
V.S. Neverov
A.B. Kukushkin
A.G. Alekseev
Ch. Linsmeier
author_facet J. Romazanov
S. Brezinsek
R.A. Pitts
A. Kirschner
A. Eksaeva
D. Borodin
E. Veshchev
V.S. Neverov
A.B. Kukushkin
A.G. Alekseev
Ch. Linsmeier
author_sort J. Romazanov
collection DOAJ
description The present study addresses the uncertainties that affect the recently performed predictions of beryllium (Be) erosion and migration in ITER using the Monte-Carlo code ERO2.0. The focus of the study is a D–T baseline discharge with fusion power gain Q=10, scrape-off layer (SOL) input power PSOL=100MW, toroidal plasma current Ip=15MA, and central toroidal field Bt=5.3T. The parameter studies used to investigate uncertainties include variations of the radial extrapolation of plasma parameters in the far-SOL (scan A), the assumptions on impact angle distributions (scan B) and the anomalous transport of eroded Be (scan C). Variations by factors ∼3, ∼18and ∼2for scans A, B and C, respectively, are found.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T18:57:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d04961df65844a69f9d2c1b8e4e2ae1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-1791
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T18:57:40Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Nuclear Materials and Energy
spelling doaj.art-7d04961df65844a69f9d2c1b8e4e2ae12022-12-21T22:20:28ZengElsevierNuclear Materials and Energy2352-17912021-03-0126100904A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITERJ. Romazanov0S. Brezinsek1R.A. Pitts2A. Kirschner3A. Eksaeva4D. Borodin5E. Veshchev6V.S. Neverov7A.B. Kukushkin8A.G. Alekseev9Ch. Linsmeier10Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, Germany; Correspondence to: JARA-HPC, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany.Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067, St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, FranceForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067, St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, FranceNational Research Centre ’Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow 123182, RussiaNational Research Centre ’Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow 123182, RussiaNational Research Centre ’Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow 123182, RussiaForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyThe present study addresses the uncertainties that affect the recently performed predictions of beryllium (Be) erosion and migration in ITER using the Monte-Carlo code ERO2.0. The focus of the study is a D–T baseline discharge with fusion power gain Q=10, scrape-off layer (SOL) input power PSOL=100MW, toroidal plasma current Ip=15MA, and central toroidal field Bt=5.3T. The parameter studies used to investigate uncertainties include variations of the radial extrapolation of plasma parameters in the far-SOL (scan A), the assumptions on impact angle distributions (scan B) and the anomalous transport of eroded Be (scan C). Variations by factors ∼3, ∼18and ∼2for scans A, B and C, respectively, are found.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235217912100003XBerylliumErosionMigrationERO2.0ITER
spellingShingle J. Romazanov
S. Brezinsek
R.A. Pitts
A. Kirschner
A. Eksaeva
D. Borodin
E. Veshchev
V.S. Neverov
A.B. Kukushkin
A.G. Alekseev
Ch. Linsmeier
A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Beryllium
Erosion
Migration
ERO2.0
ITER
title A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER
title_full A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER
title_fullStr A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER
title_full_unstemmed A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER
title_short A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER
title_sort sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in iter
topic Beryllium
Erosion
Migration
ERO2.0
ITER
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235217912100003X
work_keys_str_mv AT jromazanov asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT sbrezinsek asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT rapitts asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT akirschner asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT aeksaeva asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT dborodin asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT eveshchev asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT vsneverov asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT abkukushkin asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT agalekseev asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT chlinsmeier asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT jromazanov sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT sbrezinsek sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT rapitts sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT akirschner sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT aeksaeva sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT dborodin sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT eveshchev sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT vsneverov sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT abkukushkin sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT agalekseev sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter
AT chlinsmeier sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter