A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER
The present study addresses the uncertainties that affect the recently performed predictions of beryllium (Be) erosion and migration in ITER using the Monte-Carlo code ERO2.0. The focus of the study is a D–T baseline discharge with fusion power gain Q=10, scrape-off layer (SOL) input power PSOL=100M...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Nuclear Materials and Energy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235217912100003X |
_version_ | 1818624482618638336 |
---|---|
author | J. Romazanov S. Brezinsek R.A. Pitts A. Kirschner A. Eksaeva D. Borodin E. Veshchev V.S. Neverov A.B. Kukushkin A.G. Alekseev Ch. Linsmeier |
author_facet | J. Romazanov S. Brezinsek R.A. Pitts A. Kirschner A. Eksaeva D. Borodin E. Veshchev V.S. Neverov A.B. Kukushkin A.G. Alekseev Ch. Linsmeier |
author_sort | J. Romazanov |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The present study addresses the uncertainties that affect the recently performed predictions of beryllium (Be) erosion and migration in ITER using the Monte-Carlo code ERO2.0. The focus of the study is a D–T baseline discharge with fusion power gain Q=10, scrape-off layer (SOL) input power PSOL=100MW, toroidal plasma current Ip=15MA, and central toroidal field Bt=5.3T. The parameter studies used to investigate uncertainties include variations of the radial extrapolation of plasma parameters in the far-SOL (scan A), the assumptions on impact angle distributions (scan B) and the anomalous transport of eroded Be (scan C). Variations by factors ∼3, ∼18and ∼2for scans A, B and C, respectively, are found. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T18:57:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7d04961df65844a69f9d2c1b8e4e2ae1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2352-1791 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T18:57:40Z |
publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Nuclear Materials and Energy |
spelling | doaj.art-7d04961df65844a69f9d2c1b8e4e2ae12022-12-21T22:20:28ZengElsevierNuclear Materials and Energy2352-17912021-03-0126100904A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITERJ. Romazanov0S. Brezinsek1R.A. Pitts2A. Kirschner3A. Eksaeva4D. Borodin5E. Veshchev6V.S. Neverov7A.B. Kukushkin8A.G. Alekseev9Ch. Linsmeier10Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, Germany; Correspondence to: JARA-HPC, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany.Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067, St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, FranceForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067, St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, FranceNational Research Centre ’Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow 123182, RussiaNational Research Centre ’Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow 123182, RussiaNational Research Centre ’Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow 123182, RussiaForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC), 52425 Jülich, GermanyThe present study addresses the uncertainties that affect the recently performed predictions of beryllium (Be) erosion and migration in ITER using the Monte-Carlo code ERO2.0. The focus of the study is a D–T baseline discharge with fusion power gain Q=10, scrape-off layer (SOL) input power PSOL=100MW, toroidal plasma current Ip=15MA, and central toroidal field Bt=5.3T. The parameter studies used to investigate uncertainties include variations of the radial extrapolation of plasma parameters in the far-SOL (scan A), the assumptions on impact angle distributions (scan B) and the anomalous transport of eroded Be (scan C). Variations by factors ∼3, ∼18and ∼2for scans A, B and C, respectively, are found.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235217912100003XBerylliumErosionMigrationERO2.0ITER |
spellingShingle | J. Romazanov S. Brezinsek R.A. Pitts A. Kirschner A. Eksaeva D. Borodin E. Veshchev V.S. Neverov A.B. Kukushkin A.G. Alekseev Ch. Linsmeier A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER Nuclear Materials and Energy Beryllium Erosion Migration ERO2.0 ITER |
title | A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER |
title_full | A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER |
title_fullStr | A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER |
title_full_unstemmed | A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER |
title_short | A sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in ITER |
title_sort | sensitivity analysis of numerical predictions for beryllium erosion and migration in iter |
topic | Beryllium Erosion Migration ERO2.0 ITER |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235217912100003X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jromazanov asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT sbrezinsek asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT rapitts asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT akirschner asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT aeksaeva asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT dborodin asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT eveshchev asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT vsneverov asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT abkukushkin asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT agalekseev asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT chlinsmeier asensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT jromazanov sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT sbrezinsek sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT rapitts sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT akirschner sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT aeksaeva sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT dborodin sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT eveshchev sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT vsneverov sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT abkukushkin sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT agalekseev sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter AT chlinsmeier sensitivityanalysisofnumericalpredictionsforberylliumerosionandmigrationiniter |