Om kvalifikationer og køn
Qualifications and Gender It is a myth that the universities as a system unconditionally recruit the academically best-qualified researchers. The priorities in the research system is determined by a range of - partly externally given - system requirements, which include a specific distribution of po...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
The Royal Danish Library
1999-03-01
|
Series: | Kvinder, Køn & Forskning |
Online Access: | https://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/28430 |
_version_ | 1818843758407450624 |
---|---|
author | Inge Henningsen |
author_facet | Inge Henningsen |
author_sort | Inge Henningsen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Qualifications and Gender
It is a myth that the universities as a system unconditionally recruit the academically best-qualified researchers. The priorities in the research system is determined by a range of - partly externally given - system requirements, which include a specific distribution of positions and research grants with regard to academic disciplines and research topics together with a set of institutional and geographic constraints. The system requirements predetermine at all times which kind of academic qualifications are in demand and determine who may altogether come into consideration for a research position. Fulfilment of the system requirements has both currently and historically justified that less qualified researchers with a specific academic profile are preferred to academic positions. The article offers examples of what is presently considered to be legitimate system requirements. Among these is not a more equal representation of the sexes in academic positions. The article argues that a more equal representation of the sexes could lead to an increase in the overall academic quality of the research system. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T05:02:57Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7d08a42ec4364a20ad2f5e319d556937 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2245-6937 |
language | Danish |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T05:02:57Z |
publishDate | 1999-03-01 |
publisher | The Royal Danish Library |
record_format | Article |
series | Kvinder, Køn & Forskning |
spelling | doaj.art-7d08a42ec4364a20ad2f5e319d5569372022-12-21T20:35:01ZdanThe Royal Danish LibraryKvinder, Køn & Forskning2245-69371999-03-01110.7146/kkf.v0i1.28430Om kvalifikationer og kønInge HenningsenQualifications and Gender It is a myth that the universities as a system unconditionally recruit the academically best-qualified researchers. The priorities in the research system is determined by a range of - partly externally given - system requirements, which include a specific distribution of positions and research grants with regard to academic disciplines and research topics together with a set of institutional and geographic constraints. The system requirements predetermine at all times which kind of academic qualifications are in demand and determine who may altogether come into consideration for a research position. Fulfilment of the system requirements has both currently and historically justified that less qualified researchers with a specific academic profile are preferred to academic positions. The article offers examples of what is presently considered to be legitimate system requirements. Among these is not a more equal representation of the sexes in academic positions. The article argues that a more equal representation of the sexes could lead to an increase in the overall academic quality of the research system.https://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/28430 |
spellingShingle | Inge Henningsen Om kvalifikationer og køn Kvinder, Køn & Forskning |
title | Om kvalifikationer og køn |
title_full | Om kvalifikationer og køn |
title_fullStr | Om kvalifikationer og køn |
title_full_unstemmed | Om kvalifikationer og køn |
title_short | Om kvalifikationer og køn |
title_sort | om kvalifikationer og kon |
url | https://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/28430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ingehenningsen omkvalifikationerogkøn |