Instrument syntactic realization in Italian and LIS

This study compares how instruments are syntactically realized in Italian and LIS, using a cross-modal comparative approach. In Italian, Instruments are syntactically realized only when they are not recoverable from the verb. Three Instrument types are identified: shadow, default, and open. Only...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mantovan, Lara, Suozzi, Alice
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari 2023-10-01
Series:Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Occidentale
Subjects:
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.30687/AnnOc/2499-1562/2023/01/004
Description
Summary:This study compares how instruments are syntactically realized in Italian and LIS, using a cross-modal comparative approach. In Italian, Instruments are syntactically realized only when they are not recoverable from the verb. Three Instrument types are identified: shadow, default, and open. Only shadow Instruments are incorporated into the verbal root. As for LIS, our analysis reveals that shadow Instruments are preferred and finer-grained compared to Italian, probably due to visual modality. This has implications for Italian-to-LIS interpretation, as interpreters might make a wrong choice when Italian does not specify, but LIS requires a shadow Instrument.
ISSN:2499-1562