Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity

To assess the merits and demerits of the content of Culp’s educational programme, the paper does three things: First, it discusses whether Culp’s defence against conceivable objections manages to effectively dispel the charge of cosmopolitan arrogance. Second, it spells out one implication of episte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Beckstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-12-01
Series:Ethics & Global Politics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2020.1816001
_version_ 1818550795632640000
author Martin Beckstein
author_facet Martin Beckstein
author_sort Martin Beckstein
collection DOAJ
description To assess the merits and demerits of the content of Culp’s educational programme, the paper does three things: First, it discusses whether Culp’s defence against conceivable objections manages to effectively dispel the charge of cosmopolitan arrogance. Second, it spells out one implication of epistemic modesty, which Culp considers a core competence to be imparted by citizenship education. Third, it reflects upon the tricky task of motivating individuals to comply with the demands of justice. Taken together, the paper argues that Culp’s case is impressively strong but nevertheless tends to suffer from a rationalist constriction. It does not leave sufficient room for tradition in private life and public reasoning. This rationalist constriction is problematic from a normative philosophical, and especially a practice-oriented viewpoint.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:51:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d16eafaecd14e1f90a3c62344cfdb83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1654-4951
1654-6369
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:51:16Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Ethics & Global Politics
spelling doaj.art-7d16eafaecd14e1f90a3c62344cfdb832022-12-22T00:30:13ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEthics & Global Politics1654-49511654-63692020-12-0113313914610.1080/16544951.2020.18160011816001Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarityMartin Beckstein0University of ZurichTo assess the merits and demerits of the content of Culp’s educational programme, the paper does three things: First, it discusses whether Culp’s defence against conceivable objections manages to effectively dispel the charge of cosmopolitan arrogance. Second, it spells out one implication of epistemic modesty, which Culp considers a core competence to be imparted by citizenship education. Third, it reflects upon the tricky task of motivating individuals to comply with the demands of justice. Taken together, the paper argues that Culp’s case is impressively strong but nevertheless tends to suffer from a rationalist constriction. It does not leave sufficient room for tradition in private life and public reasoning. This rationalist constriction is problematic from a normative philosophical, and especially a practice-oriented viewpoint.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2020.1816001cosmoplitanismsolidarityepistemic modestytraditiondemocracyeducation
spellingShingle Martin Beckstein
Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity
Ethics & Global Politics
cosmoplitanism
solidarity
epistemic modesty
tradition
democracy
education
title Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity
title_full Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity
title_fullStr Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity
title_full_unstemmed Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity
title_short Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity
title_sort cosmopolitan arrogance epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity
topic cosmoplitanism
solidarity
epistemic modesty
tradition
democracy
education
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2020.1816001
work_keys_str_mv AT martinbeckstein cosmopolitanarroganceepistemicmodestyandthemotivationalprerequisitesforsolidarity