Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity
To assess the merits and demerits of the content of Culp’s educational programme, the paper does three things: First, it discusses whether Culp’s defence against conceivable objections manages to effectively dispel the charge of cosmopolitan arrogance. Second, it spells out one implication of episte...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Ethics & Global Politics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2020.1816001 |
_version_ | 1818550795632640000 |
---|---|
author | Martin Beckstein |
author_facet | Martin Beckstein |
author_sort | Martin Beckstein |
collection | DOAJ |
description | To assess the merits and demerits of the content of Culp’s educational programme, the paper does three things: First, it discusses whether Culp’s defence against conceivable objections manages to effectively dispel the charge of cosmopolitan arrogance. Second, it spells out one implication of epistemic modesty, which Culp considers a core competence to be imparted by citizenship education. Third, it reflects upon the tricky task of motivating individuals to comply with the demands of justice. Taken together, the paper argues that Culp’s case is impressively strong but nevertheless tends to suffer from a rationalist constriction. It does not leave sufficient room for tradition in private life and public reasoning. This rationalist constriction is problematic from a normative philosophical, and especially a practice-oriented viewpoint. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T08:51:16Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7d16eafaecd14e1f90a3c62344cfdb83 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1654-4951 1654-6369 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T08:51:16Z |
publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | Ethics & Global Politics |
spelling | doaj.art-7d16eafaecd14e1f90a3c62344cfdb832022-12-22T00:30:13ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEthics & Global Politics1654-49511654-63692020-12-0113313914610.1080/16544951.2020.18160011816001Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarityMartin Beckstein0University of ZurichTo assess the merits and demerits of the content of Culp’s educational programme, the paper does three things: First, it discusses whether Culp’s defence against conceivable objections manages to effectively dispel the charge of cosmopolitan arrogance. Second, it spells out one implication of epistemic modesty, which Culp considers a core competence to be imparted by citizenship education. Third, it reflects upon the tricky task of motivating individuals to comply with the demands of justice. Taken together, the paper argues that Culp’s case is impressively strong but nevertheless tends to suffer from a rationalist constriction. It does not leave sufficient room for tradition in private life and public reasoning. This rationalist constriction is problematic from a normative philosophical, and especially a practice-oriented viewpoint.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2020.1816001cosmoplitanismsolidarityepistemic modestytraditiondemocracyeducation |
spellingShingle | Martin Beckstein Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity Ethics & Global Politics cosmoplitanism solidarity epistemic modesty tradition democracy education |
title | Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity |
title_full | Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity |
title_fullStr | Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity |
title_full_unstemmed | Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity |
title_short | Cosmopolitan arrogance, epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity |
title_sort | cosmopolitan arrogance epistemic modesty and the motivational prerequisites for solidarity |
topic | cosmoplitanism solidarity epistemic modesty tradition democracy education |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2020.1816001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinbeckstein cosmopolitanarroganceepistemicmodestyandthemotivationalprerequisitesforsolidarity |