Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Interest in computational thinking (CT) in the scientific community has increased significantly in the last 4 years, as evidenced by the numerous systematic reviews carried out. However, there is a lack of reviews that update the emerging conceptualization of CT and which also examine the roles of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jesús Acevedo-Borrega, Jesús Valverde-Berrocoso, María del Carmen Garrido-Arroyo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/1/39
_version_ 1797494589642244096
author Jesús Acevedo-Borrega
Jesús Valverde-Berrocoso
María del Carmen Garrido-Arroyo
author_facet Jesús Acevedo-Borrega
Jesús Valverde-Berrocoso
María del Carmen Garrido-Arroyo
author_sort Jesús Acevedo-Borrega
collection DOAJ
description Interest in computational thinking (CT) in the scientific community has increased significantly in the last 4 years, as evidenced by the numerous systematic reviews carried out. However, there is a lack of reviews that update the emerging conceptualization of CT and which also examine the roles of the school curriculum and teachers in the face of CT. A systematic literature review (SLR) consists of a collection of research conducted according to previous criteria with the aim of answering research questions with validity and quality. For this reason, the PRISMA-ScR statement was followed. Articles published in scientific journals, from Scopus and WoS, between January 2018 and August 2021 were included, in the English or Spanish language. The initial search resulted in 492 articles, to which the inclusion-exclusion criteria were applied. The final sample of texts for the present systematic review was <i>n</i> = 145. The texts were analyzed from three perspectives: conceptual, documentary and pedagogical. Thus, a renewal of previous literature reviews was carried out, updating the situation with research from recent years and new data, obtained to contribute to the collective intelligence on methodological strategies (80% of the sample was divided into “plugged” and “unplugged”); educational (more than 50% studied CT evaluation); and resources, including a collection of more than 119 educational resources.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:36:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d1da46ef8ea45419dd4d01d9ef12eba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:36:30Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-7d1da46ef8ea45419dd4d01d9ef12eba2023-11-23T13:32:56ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022022-01-011213910.3390/educsci12010039Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the LiteratureJesús Acevedo-Borrega0Jesús Valverde-Berrocoso1María del Carmen Garrido-Arroyo2Department of Education Sciences, Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Extremadura, Avenida de la Universidad s/n, 10003 Cáceres, SpainDepartment of Education Sciences, Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Extremadura, Avenida de la Universidad s/n, 10003 Cáceres, SpainDepartment of Education Sciences, Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Extremadura, Avenida de la Universidad s/n, 10003 Cáceres, SpainInterest in computational thinking (CT) in the scientific community has increased significantly in the last 4 years, as evidenced by the numerous systematic reviews carried out. However, there is a lack of reviews that update the emerging conceptualization of CT and which also examine the roles of the school curriculum and teachers in the face of CT. A systematic literature review (SLR) consists of a collection of research conducted according to previous criteria with the aim of answering research questions with validity and quality. For this reason, the PRISMA-ScR statement was followed. Articles published in scientific journals, from Scopus and WoS, between January 2018 and August 2021 were included, in the English or Spanish language. The initial search resulted in 492 articles, to which the inclusion-exclusion criteria were applied. The final sample of texts for the present systematic review was <i>n</i> = 145. The texts were analyzed from three perspectives: conceptual, documentary and pedagogical. Thus, a renewal of previous literature reviews was carried out, updating the situation with research from recent years and new data, obtained to contribute to the collective intelligence on methodological strategies (80% of the sample was divided into “plugged” and “unplugged”); educational (more than 50% studied CT evaluation); and resources, including a collection of more than 119 educational resources.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/1/39computational thinkingproblem solving21st-century skillseducationsystematic literature review
spellingShingle Jesús Acevedo-Borrega
Jesús Valverde-Berrocoso
María del Carmen Garrido-Arroyo
Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature
Education Sciences
computational thinking
problem solving
21st-century skills
education
systematic literature review
title Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature
title_full Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature
title_short Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature
title_sort computational thinking and educational technology a scoping review of the literature
topic computational thinking
problem solving
21st-century skills
education
systematic literature review
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/1/39
work_keys_str_mv AT jesusacevedoborrega computationalthinkingandeducationaltechnologyascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT jesusvalverdeberrocoso computationalthinkingandeducationaltechnologyascopingreviewoftheliterature
AT mariadelcarmengarridoarroyo computationalthinkingandeducationaltechnologyascopingreviewoftheliterature