Primary productivity in the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variability

Summary: The seasonal patterns of primary production, phytoplankton biomass, chlorophyll a, and nutrients were investigated in the central part of the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) during 2011 and 2012. Annual primary productivity in the gulf was in the range of 353.4–376.2 gC m−2. Maximum carbon fixati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingrida Purina, Atis Labucis, Ieva Barda, Iveta Jurgensone, Juris Aigars
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-10-01
Series:Oceanologia
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0078323418300630
_version_ 1798043638494658560
author Ingrida Purina
Atis Labucis
Ieva Barda
Iveta Jurgensone
Juris Aigars
author_facet Ingrida Purina
Atis Labucis
Ieva Barda
Iveta Jurgensone
Juris Aigars
author_sort Ingrida Purina
collection DOAJ
description Summary: The seasonal patterns of primary production, phytoplankton biomass, chlorophyll a, and nutrients were investigated in the central part of the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) during 2011 and 2012. Annual primary productivity in the gulf was in the range of 353.4–376.2 gC m−2. Maximum carbon fixation rates occurred during the phytoplankton spring bloom from April to May when the winter nutrient pool was rapidly exhausted, suggesting the use of regenerated nutrients already in spring. The new production calculated on the draw-down of nitrates amounted to 51.80% of spring net community production. The production rates during summer were considerably lower owing to the availability of only regenerated nutrients and limited nitrogen fixation. Autumn was established as the least productive season. In autumn despite the elevated nutrient concentrations, the increasingly limited light hindered photosynthetic activity. Species governing the nutrient fluxes and the productivity of the Gulf of Riga are the diatom species responsible for new production in spring. The photosynthetic ciliate Mesodinium rubrum ((Lohmann) Hamburger & Buddenbrock 1911) prevailed in all seasons and significantly correlated with elevated productivity, while diazotrophic cyanobacteria Aphanizomenon flosaquae (Ralfs ex Bornet & Flahault 1886) contributed to new production in the summer nutrient regenerating system. Keywords: Primary production, New production, Mesodinium rubrum, Aphanizomenon flosaquae, Gulf of Riga, Baltic Sea
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:51:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d50928ec8b7460da981817505da7635
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0078-3234
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:51:52Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Oceanologia
spelling doaj.art-7d50928ec8b7460da981817505da76352022-12-22T03:58:33ZengElsevierOceanologia0078-32342018-10-01604544552Primary productivity in the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variabilityIngrida Purina0Atis Labucis1Ieva Barda2Iveta Jurgensone3Juris Aigars4Corresponding author at: Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Voleru Str. 4, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia. Tel.: +371 26186367.; Latvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Riga, LatviaLatvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Riga, LatviaLatvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Riga, LatviaLatvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Riga, LatviaLatvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Riga, LatviaSummary: The seasonal patterns of primary production, phytoplankton biomass, chlorophyll a, and nutrients were investigated in the central part of the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) during 2011 and 2012. Annual primary productivity in the gulf was in the range of 353.4–376.2 gC m−2. Maximum carbon fixation rates occurred during the phytoplankton spring bloom from April to May when the winter nutrient pool was rapidly exhausted, suggesting the use of regenerated nutrients already in spring. The new production calculated on the draw-down of nitrates amounted to 51.80% of spring net community production. The production rates during summer were considerably lower owing to the availability of only regenerated nutrients and limited nitrogen fixation. Autumn was established as the least productive season. In autumn despite the elevated nutrient concentrations, the increasingly limited light hindered photosynthetic activity. Species governing the nutrient fluxes and the productivity of the Gulf of Riga are the diatom species responsible for new production in spring. The photosynthetic ciliate Mesodinium rubrum ((Lohmann) Hamburger & Buddenbrock 1911) prevailed in all seasons and significantly correlated with elevated productivity, while diazotrophic cyanobacteria Aphanizomenon flosaquae (Ralfs ex Bornet & Flahault 1886) contributed to new production in the summer nutrient regenerating system. Keywords: Primary production, New production, Mesodinium rubrum, Aphanizomenon flosaquae, Gulf of Riga, Baltic Seahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0078323418300630
spellingShingle Ingrida Purina
Atis Labucis
Ieva Barda
Iveta Jurgensone
Juris Aigars
Primary productivity in the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variability
Oceanologia
title Primary productivity in the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variability
title_full Primary productivity in the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variability
title_fullStr Primary productivity in the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variability
title_full_unstemmed Primary productivity in the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variability
title_short Primary productivity in the Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variability
title_sort primary productivity in the gulf of riga baltic sea in relation to phytoplankton species and nutrient variability
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0078323418300630
work_keys_str_mv AT ingridapurina primaryproductivityinthegulfofrigabalticseainrelationtophytoplanktonspeciesandnutrientvariability
AT atislabucis primaryproductivityinthegulfofrigabalticseainrelationtophytoplanktonspeciesandnutrientvariability
AT ievabarda primaryproductivityinthegulfofrigabalticseainrelationtophytoplanktonspeciesandnutrientvariability
AT ivetajurgensone primaryproductivityinthegulfofrigabalticseainrelationtophytoplanktonspeciesandnutrientvariability
AT jurisaigars primaryproductivityinthegulfofrigabalticseainrelationtophytoplanktonspeciesandnutrientvariability