Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique
Abstract An important factor affecting the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported reconstructions is the implant-abutment misfit. Objective: This study evaluated the misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants by means of polyvinyl siloxane replica technique using microcomputed tomography (μ...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of São Paulo
|
| Series: | Journal of Applied Oral Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jaos/v28/1678-7765-jaos-28-e20200343.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819180119350050816 |
|---|---|
| author | Karina Bergamo Cardoso Edmara Tatiely Pedroso Bergamo Vitor De Moraes Cruz Ilana Santos Ramalho Lucas Fracassi De Oliveira Lino Estevam Augusto Bonfante |
| author_facet | Karina Bergamo Cardoso Edmara Tatiely Pedroso Bergamo Vitor De Moraes Cruz Ilana Santos Ramalho Lucas Fracassi De Oliveira Lino Estevam Augusto Bonfante |
| author_sort | Karina Bergamo Cardoso |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract An important factor affecting the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported reconstructions is the implant-abutment misfit. Objective: This study evaluated the misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants by means of polyvinyl siloxane replica technique using microcomputed tomography (μCT). Methodology: Volumetric and linear (central and marginal) gaps of four Ti-base abutments (n=10/group): (i) Odontofix LTDA (OD), (ii) Singular Implants (SING), (iii) EFF Dental Components (EFF), and (iv) Control Group (S.I.N implants) compatible with an implant system (Strong SW, S.I.N Implants) were measured using μCT reconstructed polyvinyl siloxane replicas. Results: The results showed significantly lower volume gap for Control S.I.N (0.67±0.29 mm3) and SING (0.69±0.28 mm3) Ti-base abutments relative to OD (1.42±0.28 mm3) and EFF groups (1.04±0.28 mm3) (p<0.033), without significant difference between them (p=0.936). While gap values were homogenous in the central region, EFF presented a significantly higher marginal gap. Accordingly, the Control S.I.N and Singular Ti-base abutments showed improved volumetric and marginal fit relative to Odontofix and EFF. Conclusion: The method of manufacturing abutments influenced the misfit at the implant-abutment interface. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T22:09:16Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7d50e85d98384d70b6bb733daefaa851 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1678-7765 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T22:09:16Z |
| publisher | University of São Paulo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Applied Oral Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-7d50e85d98384d70b6bb733daefaa8512022-12-21T18:10:55ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-776510.1590/1678-7757-2020-0343Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica techniqueKarina Bergamo CardosoEdmara Tatiely Pedroso BergamoVitor De Moraes CruzIlana Santos RamalhoLucas Fracassi De Oliveira LinoEstevam Augusto BonfanteAbstract An important factor affecting the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported reconstructions is the implant-abutment misfit. Objective: This study evaluated the misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants by means of polyvinyl siloxane replica technique using microcomputed tomography (μCT). Methodology: Volumetric and linear (central and marginal) gaps of four Ti-base abutments (n=10/group): (i) Odontofix LTDA (OD), (ii) Singular Implants (SING), (iii) EFF Dental Components (EFF), and (iv) Control Group (S.I.N implants) compatible with an implant system (Strong SW, S.I.N Implants) were measured using μCT reconstructed polyvinyl siloxane replicas. Results: The results showed significantly lower volume gap for Control S.I.N (0.67±0.29 mm3) and SING (0.69±0.28 mm3) Ti-base abutments relative to OD (1.42±0.28 mm3) and EFF groups (1.04±0.28 mm3) (p<0.033), without significant difference between them (p=0.936). While gap values were homogenous in the central region, EFF presented a significantly higher marginal gap. Accordingly, the Control S.I.N and Singular Ti-base abutments showed improved volumetric and marginal fit relative to Odontofix and EFF. Conclusion: The method of manufacturing abutments influenced the misfit at the implant-abutment interface.http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jaos/v28/1678-7765-jaos-28-e20200343.pdfDental implantsDental abutmentsX-ray microtomography |
| spellingShingle | Karina Bergamo Cardoso Edmara Tatiely Pedroso Bergamo Vitor De Moraes Cruz Ilana Santos Ramalho Lucas Fracassi De Oliveira Lino Estevam Augusto Bonfante Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique Journal of Applied Oral Science Dental implants Dental abutments X-ray microtomography |
| title | Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique |
| title_full | Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique |
| title_fullStr | Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique |
| title_full_unstemmed | Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique |
| title_short | Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique |
| title_sort | three dimensional misfit between ti base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique |
| topic | Dental implants Dental abutments X-ray microtomography |
| url | http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jaos/v28/1678-7765-jaos-28-e20200343.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT karinabergamocardoso threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique AT edmaratatielypedrosobergamo threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique AT vitordemoraescruz threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique AT ilanasantosramalho threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique AT lucasfracassideoliveiralino threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique AT estevamaugustobonfante threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique |