Vascular Evaluation around the Cervical Nerve Roots during Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block

Introduction: To carry out ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block (CNRB) safely, we investigated the frequency of risky blood vessels around the target nerve root and within the imaginary needle pathway in the actual injecting position. Methods: 30 patients (20 men, 10 women) with cervical radi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shizumasa Murata, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Yuta Natsumi, Hiroshi Minagawa, Hiroshi Yamada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2020-01-01
Series:Spine Surgery and Related Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/4/1/4_2019-0006/_pdf/-char/en
_version_ 1818967324697296896
author Shizumasa Murata
Hiroshi Iwasaki
Yuta Natsumi
Hiroshi Minagawa
Hiroshi Yamada
author_facet Shizumasa Murata
Hiroshi Iwasaki
Yuta Natsumi
Hiroshi Minagawa
Hiroshi Yamada
author_sort Shizumasa Murata
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: To carry out ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block (CNRB) safely, we investigated the frequency of risky blood vessels around the target nerve root and within the imaginary needle pathway in the actual injecting position. Methods: 30 patients (20 men, 10 women) with cervical radiculopathy who received ultrasound-guided CNRB were included in this study. We defined a risky blood vessel as an artery existing within 4 mm from the center of the target nerve root or located in the range of 2 mm above or below the imaginary needle pathway. Results: Using the color Doppler method, the frequency of a risky blood vessel existing around 4 mm from the center of the C5 nerve root was 3.3% (1/30), whereas it was 3.3% (1/30) for the C6 nerve root and 23.3% (7/30) for the C7 nerve root. Hence, the C7 level had more blood vessels close to the target nerve root compared to the C5 and C6 levels, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.0523). On the other hand, the frequency of a risky blood vessel existing within 2 mm above and below the imaginary needle pathway was 3.3% (1/30) for the C5 nerve root, whereas it was 3.3% (1/30) for the C6 nerve root and 10.0% (3/30) for the C7 nerve root. The C7 level had more blood vessels within the needle pathway compared to the C5 and C6 levels, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.301). Conclusions: To reduce the risk of unintended intravascular injections, more careful checking for the presence or absence of blood vessels at the C7 level using color Doppler is necessary.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T13:46:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d714596d78847069242a9840d71d1b3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2432-261X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T13:46:59Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format Article
series Spine Surgery and Related Research
spelling doaj.art-7d714596d78847069242a9840d71d1b32022-12-21T19:38:37ZengThe Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related ResearchSpine Surgery and Related Research2432-261X2020-01-0141182210.22603/ssrr.2019-00062019-0006Vascular Evaluation around the Cervical Nerve Roots during Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root BlockShizumasa Murata0Hiroshi Iwasaki1Yuta Natsumi2Hiroshi Minagawa3Hiroshi Yamada4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shingu Municipal Medical CenterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Johto Orthopedic ClinicDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical UniversityIntroduction: To carry out ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block (CNRB) safely, we investigated the frequency of risky blood vessels around the target nerve root and within the imaginary needle pathway in the actual injecting position. Methods: 30 patients (20 men, 10 women) with cervical radiculopathy who received ultrasound-guided CNRB were included in this study. We defined a risky blood vessel as an artery existing within 4 mm from the center of the target nerve root or located in the range of 2 mm above or below the imaginary needle pathway. Results: Using the color Doppler method, the frequency of a risky blood vessel existing around 4 mm from the center of the C5 nerve root was 3.3% (1/30), whereas it was 3.3% (1/30) for the C6 nerve root and 23.3% (7/30) for the C7 nerve root. Hence, the C7 level had more blood vessels close to the target nerve root compared to the C5 and C6 levels, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.0523). On the other hand, the frequency of a risky blood vessel existing within 2 mm above and below the imaginary needle pathway was 3.3% (1/30) for the C5 nerve root, whereas it was 3.3% (1/30) for the C6 nerve root and 10.0% (3/30) for the C7 nerve root. The C7 level had more blood vessels within the needle pathway compared to the C5 and C6 levels, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.301). Conclusions: To reduce the risk of unintended intravascular injections, more careful checking for the presence or absence of blood vessels at the C7 level using color Doppler is necessary.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/4/1/4_2019-0006/_pdf/-char/encervical spineselective nerve root blockultrasonography
spellingShingle Shizumasa Murata
Hiroshi Iwasaki
Yuta Natsumi
Hiroshi Minagawa
Hiroshi Yamada
Vascular Evaluation around the Cervical Nerve Roots during Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block
Spine Surgery and Related Research
cervical spine
selective nerve root block
ultrasonography
title Vascular Evaluation around the Cervical Nerve Roots during Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block
title_full Vascular Evaluation around the Cervical Nerve Roots during Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block
title_fullStr Vascular Evaluation around the Cervical Nerve Roots during Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block
title_full_unstemmed Vascular Evaluation around the Cervical Nerve Roots during Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block
title_short Vascular Evaluation around the Cervical Nerve Roots during Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Nerve Root Block
title_sort vascular evaluation around the cervical nerve roots during ultrasound guided cervical nerve root block
topic cervical spine
selective nerve root block
ultrasonography
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/4/1/4_2019-0006/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT shizumasamurata vascularevaluationaroundthecervicalnerverootsduringultrasoundguidedcervicalnerverootblock
AT hiroshiiwasaki vascularevaluationaroundthecervicalnerverootsduringultrasoundguidedcervicalnerverootblock
AT yutanatsumi vascularevaluationaroundthecervicalnerverootsduringultrasoundguidedcervicalnerverootblock
AT hiroshiminagawa vascularevaluationaroundthecervicalnerverootsduringultrasoundguidedcervicalnerverootblock
AT hiroshiyamada vascularevaluationaroundthecervicalnerverootsduringultrasoundguidedcervicalnerverootblock