One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To compare radial shockwave treatment with conventional physiotherapy for plantar fasciitis after 12 months of follow-up. METHOD: This was a randomized, prospective, comparative clinical study. Forty patients with a diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were divided randomly into two treatment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcus Vinicius Grecco, Guilherme Carlos Brech, Julia Maria D'Andrea Greve
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier España 2013-01-01
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000801089&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811229808701472768
author Marcus Vinicius Grecco
Guilherme Carlos Brech
Julia Maria D'Andrea Greve
author_facet Marcus Vinicius Grecco
Guilherme Carlos Brech
Julia Maria D'Andrea Greve
author_sort Marcus Vinicius Grecco
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: To compare radial shockwave treatment with conventional physiotherapy for plantar fasciitis after 12 months of follow-up. METHOD: This was a randomized, prospective, comparative clinical study. Forty patients with a diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were divided randomly into two treatment groups: group 1, with 20 patients who underwent ten physiotherapy sessions comprising ultrasound, kinesiotherapy and guidance for home-based stretching; and group 2, with 20 patients who underwent three applications of radial shockwaves, once a week, and guidance for home-based stretching. All patients were assessed regarding pain and functional abilities before treatment, immediately after and 12 months after treatment. The mean age was 49.6 ±11.8 years (range: 25-68 years), 85% were female, 88% were overweight, 63% were affected bilaterally, and 83% used analgesics regularly. RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up, both treatments were effective for improving pain and functional ability among the patients with plantar fasciitis. The improvement with shockwaves was faster. CONCLUSION: Shockwave treatment was not more effective than conventional physiotherapy treatment 12 months after the end of the treatment.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:20:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d7359006f364839bb89c5f6ce3b6529
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1980-5322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:20:20Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Elsevier España
record_format Article
series Clinics
spelling doaj.art-7d7359006f364839bb89c5f6ce3b65292022-12-22T03:37:07ZengElsevier EspañaClinics1980-53222013-01-016881089109510.6061/clinics/2013(08)05S1807-59322013000801089One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapyMarcus Vinicius GreccoGuilherme Carlos BrechJulia Maria D'Andrea GreveOBJECTIVE: To compare radial shockwave treatment with conventional physiotherapy for plantar fasciitis after 12 months of follow-up. METHOD: This was a randomized, prospective, comparative clinical study. Forty patients with a diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were divided randomly into two treatment groups: group 1, with 20 patients who underwent ten physiotherapy sessions comprising ultrasound, kinesiotherapy and guidance for home-based stretching; and group 2, with 20 patients who underwent three applications of radial shockwaves, once a week, and guidance for home-based stretching. All patients were assessed regarding pain and functional abilities before treatment, immediately after and 12 months after treatment. The mean age was 49.6 ±11.8 years (range: 25-68 years), 85% were female, 88% were overweight, 63% were affected bilaterally, and 83% used analgesics regularly. RESULTS: At the 12-month follow-up, both treatments were effective for improving pain and functional ability among the patients with plantar fasciitis. The improvement with shockwaves was faster. CONCLUSION: Shockwave treatment was not more effective than conventional physiotherapy treatment 12 months after the end of the treatment.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000801089&lng=en&tlng=enPlantar FasciitisShockwave TherapyPhysiotherapy
spellingShingle Marcus Vinicius Grecco
Guilherme Carlos Brech
Julia Maria D'Andrea Greve
One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy
Clinics
Plantar Fasciitis
Shockwave Therapy
Physiotherapy
title One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy
title_full One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy
title_fullStr One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy
title_short One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy
title_sort one year treatment follow up of plantar fasciitis radial shockwaves vs conventional physiotherapy
topic Plantar Fasciitis
Shockwave Therapy
Physiotherapy
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322013000801089&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusviniciusgrecco oneyeartreatmentfollowupofplantarfasciitisradialshockwavesvsconventionalphysiotherapy
AT guilhermecarlosbrech oneyeartreatmentfollowupofplantarfasciitisradialshockwavesvsconventionalphysiotherapy
AT juliamariadandreagreve oneyeartreatmentfollowupofplantarfasciitisradialshockwavesvsconventionalphysiotherapy