The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The insertion of Ventricular Assist Devices is a common strategy for cardiovascular support in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This study sought to determine the impact of ventricular assist devices on the dynamic relatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dunster Kimble R, Barnett Adrian G, Ainslie Philip, Tzeng Yu-Chieh, Chan Gregory S, Bellapart Judith, Boots Rob, Fraser John F
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-02-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/11/4
_version_ 1818662573403275264
author Dunster Kimble R
Barnett Adrian G
Ainslie Philip
Tzeng Yu-Chieh
Chan Gregory S
Bellapart Judith
Boots Rob
Fraser John F
author_facet Dunster Kimble R
Barnett Adrian G
Ainslie Philip
Tzeng Yu-Chieh
Chan Gregory S
Bellapart Judith
Boots Rob
Fraser John F
author_sort Dunster Kimble R
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The insertion of Ventricular Assist Devices is a common strategy for cardiovascular support in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This study sought to determine the impact of ventricular assist devices on the dynamic relationship between arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A sample of 5 patients supported with a pulsatile ventricular assist device was compared with 5 control patients. Controls were matched for age, co-morbidities, current diagnosis and cardiac output state, to cases. Beat-to-beat recordings of mean arterial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity, using transcranial Doppler were obtained. Transfer function analysis was performed on the lowpass filtered pressure and flow signals, to assess gain, phase and coherence of the relationship between mean arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity. These parameters were derived from the very low frequency (0.02-0.07 Hz), low frequency (0.07-0.2 Hz) and high frequency (0.2-0.35 Hz).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No significant difference was found in gain and phase values between the two groups, but the low frequency coherence was significantly higher in cases compared with controls (mean ± SD: 0.65 ± 0.16 vs 0.38 ± 0.19, <it>P </it>= 0.04). The two cases with highest coherence (~0.8) also had much higher spectral power in mean arterial blood pressure.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Pulsatile ventricular assist devices affect the coherence but not the gain or phase of the cerebral pressure-flow relationship in the low frequency range; thus whether there was any significant disruption of cerebral autoregulation mechanism was not exactly clear. The augmentation of input pressure fluctuations might contribute in part to the higher coherence observed.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-17T05:03:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d73e8fd86b246e1a1b18a1631150b81
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2253
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T05:03:06Z
publishDate 2011-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj.art-7d73e8fd86b246e1a1b18a1631150b812022-12-21T22:02:31ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532011-02-01111410.1186/1471-2253-11-4The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary studyDunster Kimble RBarnett Adrian GAinslie PhilipTzeng Yu-ChiehChan Gregory SBellapart JudithBoots RobFraser John F<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The insertion of Ventricular Assist Devices is a common strategy for cardiovascular support in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This study sought to determine the impact of ventricular assist devices on the dynamic relationship between arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A sample of 5 patients supported with a pulsatile ventricular assist device was compared with 5 control patients. Controls were matched for age, co-morbidities, current diagnosis and cardiac output state, to cases. Beat-to-beat recordings of mean arterial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity, using transcranial Doppler were obtained. Transfer function analysis was performed on the lowpass filtered pressure and flow signals, to assess gain, phase and coherence of the relationship between mean arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity. These parameters were derived from the very low frequency (0.02-0.07 Hz), low frequency (0.07-0.2 Hz) and high frequency (0.2-0.35 Hz).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No significant difference was found in gain and phase values between the two groups, but the low frequency coherence was significantly higher in cases compared with controls (mean ± SD: 0.65 ± 0.16 vs 0.38 ± 0.19, <it>P </it>= 0.04). The two cases with highest coherence (~0.8) also had much higher spectral power in mean arterial blood pressure.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Pulsatile ventricular assist devices affect the coherence but not the gain or phase of the cerebral pressure-flow relationship in the low frequency range; thus whether there was any significant disruption of cerebral autoregulation mechanism was not exactly clear. The augmentation of input pressure fluctuations might contribute in part to the higher coherence observed.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/11/4
spellingShingle Dunster Kimble R
Barnett Adrian G
Ainslie Philip
Tzeng Yu-Chieh
Chan Gregory S
Bellapart Judith
Boots Rob
Fraser John F
The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary study
BMC Anesthesiology
title The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary study
title_full The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary study
title_fullStr The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary study
title_short The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary study
title_sort effect of ventricular assist devices on cerebral autoregulation a preliminary study
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/11/4
work_keys_str_mv AT dunsterkimbler theeffectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT barnettadriang theeffectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT ainsliephilip theeffectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT tzengyuchieh theeffectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT changregorys theeffectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT bellapartjudith theeffectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT bootsrob theeffectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT fraserjohnf theeffectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT dunsterkimbler effectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT barnettadriang effectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT ainsliephilip effectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT tzengyuchieh effectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT changregorys effectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT bellapartjudith effectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT bootsrob effectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy
AT fraserjohnf effectofventricularassistdevicesoncerebralautoregulationapreliminarystudy