Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates

Background: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a cause of infection most commonly in the opportunistic host. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin are considered first-line treatment agents. With reports of increasing resistance to these first-line agents, it is important to determine risk fac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruce M. Jones, Jamie L. Wagner, Daniel B. Chastain, P. Brandon Bookstaver, Kayla Stover, Jason Lin, Hannah Matson, Noah White, Madalyn Motesh, Christopher M. Bland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716522000352
_version_ 1818774231335305216
author Bruce M. Jones
Jamie L. Wagner
Daniel B. Chastain
P. Brandon Bookstaver
Kayla Stover
Jason Lin
Hannah Matson
Noah White
Madalyn Motesh
Christopher M. Bland
author_facet Bruce M. Jones
Jamie L. Wagner
Daniel B. Chastain
P. Brandon Bookstaver
Kayla Stover
Jason Lin
Hannah Matson
Noah White
Madalyn Motesh
Christopher M. Bland
author_sort Bruce M. Jones
collection DOAJ
description Background: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a cause of infection most commonly in the opportunistic host. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin are considered first-line treatment agents. With reports of increasing resistance to these first-line agents, it is important to determine risk factors associated with a non-susceptible isolate. Methods: This was a real-world, multicentre, retrospective case-control study from five centres in the southeast United States evaluating S. maltophilia. The primary outcome was risk factors associated with non-susceptibility of S. maltophilia isolates to ≥1 antimicrobial agents. Secondary outcomes include incidence of S. maltophilia non-susceptibility, all-cause mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Results: There were 325 patients included in the study. For the primary outcome, the only factor associated with non-susceptibility per univariate analysis was isolation from urine culture (13.3% vs. 5.4%; P = 0.014), whereas the presence of mechanical ventilation (37.7% vs. 21.5%) and intensive care unit admission (35.3% vs. 18.4%) were associated with susceptibility (P < 0.001). For the secondary outcomes, non-susceptibility was present in 49% of isolates with 43 of 325 (13.2%), 53 of 324 (16.4%), and 105 of 172 (61%) to TMP-SMX, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime, respectively. Resistance to chloramphenicol and tigecycline was observed among 5/26 and 11/16 of tested isolates, respectively. Sixty-six patients (20%) experienced all-cause, inpatient mortality (18% susceptible vs. 23% non-susceptible; P = 0.280) and 44 patients (17%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge (16% susceptible vs. 18% non-susceptible; P = 0.673). Conclusion: S. maltophilia non-susceptibility had a prevalence of ∼50% to at least one first-line or commonly used agent. More research is needed to delineate risk factors for non-susceptible isolates.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T10:37:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d7e7e2a17294ec3896145f2f01eea37
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2213-7165
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T10:37:51Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
spelling doaj.art-7d7e7e2a17294ec3896145f2f01eea372022-12-21T21:10:42ZengElsevierJournal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance2213-71652022-03-0128282287Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolatesBruce M. Jones0Jamie L. Wagner1Daniel B. Chastain2P. Brandon Bookstaver3Kayla Stover4Jason Lin5Hannah Matson6Noah White7Madalyn Motesh8Christopher M. Bland9St. Joseph's/Candler Health System, Inc., 5353 Reynolds Street, Savannah, GA 31405; Corresponding author.University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Jackson, MississippiUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy Albany, GeorgiaUniversity of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South CarolinaUniversity of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Jackson, MississippiMemorial University Medical Center, Savannah, GeorgiaHuntsville Hospital, Huntsville, AlabamaMunster Community Hospital, Munster, IndianaNortheast Georgia Health System, Gainesville, GAUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Savannah, GeorgiaBackground: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a cause of infection most commonly in the opportunistic host. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin are considered first-line treatment agents. With reports of increasing resistance to these first-line agents, it is important to determine risk factors associated with a non-susceptible isolate. Methods: This was a real-world, multicentre, retrospective case-control study from five centres in the southeast United States evaluating S. maltophilia. The primary outcome was risk factors associated with non-susceptibility of S. maltophilia isolates to ≥1 antimicrobial agents. Secondary outcomes include incidence of S. maltophilia non-susceptibility, all-cause mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Results: There were 325 patients included in the study. For the primary outcome, the only factor associated with non-susceptibility per univariate analysis was isolation from urine culture (13.3% vs. 5.4%; P = 0.014), whereas the presence of mechanical ventilation (37.7% vs. 21.5%) and intensive care unit admission (35.3% vs. 18.4%) were associated with susceptibility (P < 0.001). For the secondary outcomes, non-susceptibility was present in 49% of isolates with 43 of 325 (13.2%), 53 of 324 (16.4%), and 105 of 172 (61%) to TMP-SMX, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime, respectively. Resistance to chloramphenicol and tigecycline was observed among 5/26 and 11/16 of tested isolates, respectively. Sixty-six patients (20%) experienced all-cause, inpatient mortality (18% susceptible vs. 23% non-susceptible; P = 0.280) and 44 patients (17%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge (16% susceptible vs. 18% non-susceptible; P = 0.673). Conclusion: S. maltophilia non-susceptibility had a prevalence of ∼50% to at least one first-line or commonly used agent. More research is needed to delineate risk factors for non-susceptible isolates.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716522000352Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaResistanceNon-susceptibleTrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazoleLevofloxacin
spellingShingle Bruce M. Jones
Jamie L. Wagner
Daniel B. Chastain
P. Brandon Bookstaver
Kayla Stover
Jason Lin
Hannah Matson
Noah White
Madalyn Motesh
Christopher M. Bland
Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Resistance
Non-susceptible
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Levofloxacin
title Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates
title_full Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates
title_fullStr Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates
title_full_unstemmed Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates
title_short Real-world, multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates
title_sort real world multicentre evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for non susceptible stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates
topic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Resistance
Non-susceptible
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Levofloxacin
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716522000352
work_keys_str_mv AT brucemjones realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT jamielwagner realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT danielbchastain realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT pbrandonbookstaver realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT kaylastover realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT jasonlin realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT hannahmatson realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT noahwhite realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT madalynmotesh realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates
AT christophermbland realworldmulticentreevaluationoftheincidenceandriskfactorsfornonsusceptiblestenotrophomonasmaltophiliaisolates