Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees

The ternary relation B(x,y,z) of betweenness states that an element y is between the elements x and z, in some sense depending on the considered structure. In a partially ordered set (N,≤), B(x,y,z):⇔x<y<z∨z<y<x, and the corresponding betweenness structure is (N,B). The class of betweenn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruno Courcelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science 2022-09-01
Series:Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7288/pdf
_version_ 1797270011626127360
author Bruno Courcelle
author_facet Bruno Courcelle
author_sort Bruno Courcelle
collection DOAJ
description The ternary relation B(x,y,z) of betweenness states that an element y is between the elements x and z, in some sense depending on the considered structure. In a partially ordered set (N,≤), B(x,y,z):⇔x<y<z∨z<y<x, and the corresponding betweenness structure is (N,B). The class of betweenness structures of linear orders is first-order definable. That of partial orders is monadic second-order definable. An order-theoretic tree is a partial order such that the set of elements larger that any element is linearly ordered and any two elements have an upper-bound. Finite or infinite rooted trees ordered by the ancestor relation are order-theoretic trees. In an order-theoretic tree, B(x,y,z) means that x<y<z or z<y<x or x<y≤x⊔z or z<y≤x⊔z, where x⊔z is the least upper-bound of incomparable elements x and z. In a previous article, we established that the corresponding class of betweenness structures is monadic second-order definable.We prove here that the induced substructures of the betweenness structures of the countable order-theoretic trees form a monadic second-order definable class, denoted by IBO. The proof uses a variant of cographs, the partitioned probe cographs, and their known six finite minimal excluded induced subgraphs called the bounds of the class. This proof links two apparently unrelated topics: cographs and order-theoretic trees.However, the class IBO has finitely many bounds, i.e., minimal excluded finite induced substructures. Hence it is first-order definable. The proof of finiteness uses well-quasi-orders and does not provide the finite list of bounds. Hence, the associated first-order defining sentence is not known.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T21:31:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d85493aec46492c9b2ae1b0e9ca647e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1365-8050
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:57:29Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
record_format Article
series Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
spelling doaj.art-7d85493aec46492c9b2ae1b0e9ca647e2024-03-07T15:44:44ZengDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer ScienceDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science1365-80502022-09-01vol. 23 no. 2, special issue...Special issues10.46298/dmtcs.72887288Induced betweenness in order-theoretic treesBruno Courcelle0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-8970Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en InformatiqueThe ternary relation B(x,y,z) of betweenness states that an element y is between the elements x and z, in some sense depending on the considered structure. In a partially ordered set (N,≤), B(x,y,z):⇔x<y<z∨z<y<x, and the corresponding betweenness structure is (N,B). The class of betweenness structures of linear orders is first-order definable. That of partial orders is monadic second-order definable. An order-theoretic tree is a partial order such that the set of elements larger that any element is linearly ordered and any two elements have an upper-bound. Finite or infinite rooted trees ordered by the ancestor relation are order-theoretic trees. In an order-theoretic tree, B(x,y,z) means that x<y<z or z<y<x or x<y≤x⊔z or z<y≤x⊔z, where x⊔z is the least upper-bound of incomparable elements x and z. In a previous article, we established that the corresponding class of betweenness structures is monadic second-order definable.We prove here that the induced substructures of the betweenness structures of the countable order-theoretic trees form a monadic second-order definable class, denoted by IBO. The proof uses a variant of cographs, the partitioned probe cographs, and their known six finite minimal excluded induced subgraphs called the bounds of the class. This proof links two apparently unrelated topics: cographs and order-theoretic trees.However, the class IBO has finitely many bounds, i.e., minimal excluded finite induced substructures. Hence it is first-order definable. The proof of finiteness uses well-quasi-orders and does not provide the finite list of bounds. Hence, the associated first-order defining sentence is not known.https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7288/pdf[info.info-lo]computer science [cs]/logic in computer science [cs.lo]
spellingShingle Bruno Courcelle
Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
[info.info-lo]computer science [cs]/logic in computer science [cs.lo]
title Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees
title_full Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees
title_fullStr Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees
title_full_unstemmed Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees
title_short Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees
title_sort induced betweenness in order theoretic trees
topic [info.info-lo]computer science [cs]/logic in computer science [cs.lo]
url https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7288/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT brunocourcelle inducedbetweennessinordertheoretictrees