Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees
The ternary relation B(x,y,z) of betweenness states that an element y is between the elements x and z, in some sense depending on the considered structure. In a partially ordered set (N,≤), B(x,y,z):⇔x<y<z∨z<y<x, and the corresponding betweenness structure is (N,B). The class of betweenn...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7288/pdf |
_version_ | 1797270011626127360 |
---|---|
author | Bruno Courcelle |
author_facet | Bruno Courcelle |
author_sort | Bruno Courcelle |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The ternary relation B(x,y,z) of betweenness states that an element y is between the elements x and z, in some sense depending on the considered structure. In a partially ordered set (N,≤), B(x,y,z):⇔x<y<z∨z<y<x, and the corresponding betweenness structure is (N,B). The class of betweenness structures of linear orders is first-order definable. That of partial orders is monadic second-order definable. An order-theoretic tree is a partial order such that the set of elements larger that any element is linearly ordered and any two elements have an upper-bound. Finite or infinite rooted trees ordered by the ancestor relation are order-theoretic trees. In an order-theoretic tree, B(x,y,z) means that x<y<z or z<y<x or x<y≤x⊔z or z<y≤x⊔z, where x⊔z is the least upper-bound of incomparable elements x and z. In a previous article, we established that the corresponding class of betweenness structures is monadic second-order definable.We prove here that the induced substructures of the betweenness structures of the countable order-theoretic trees form a monadic second-order definable class, denoted by IBO. The proof uses a variant of cographs, the partitioned probe cographs, and their known six finite minimal excluded induced subgraphs called the bounds of the class. This proof links two apparently unrelated topics: cographs and order-theoretic trees.However, the class IBO has finitely many bounds, i.e., minimal excluded finite induced substructures. Hence it is first-order definable. The proof of finiteness uses well-quasi-orders and does not provide the finite list of bounds. Hence, the associated first-order defining sentence is not known. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:31:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7d85493aec46492c9b2ae1b0e9ca647e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1365-8050 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-25T01:57:29Z |
publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
publisher | Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science |
record_format | Article |
series | Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science |
spelling | doaj.art-7d85493aec46492c9b2ae1b0e9ca647e2024-03-07T15:44:44ZengDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer ScienceDiscrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science1365-80502022-09-01vol. 23 no. 2, special issue...Special issues10.46298/dmtcs.72887288Induced betweenness in order-theoretic treesBruno Courcelle0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-8970Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en InformatiqueThe ternary relation B(x,y,z) of betweenness states that an element y is between the elements x and z, in some sense depending on the considered structure. In a partially ordered set (N,≤), B(x,y,z):⇔x<y<z∨z<y<x, and the corresponding betweenness structure is (N,B). The class of betweenness structures of linear orders is first-order definable. That of partial orders is monadic second-order definable. An order-theoretic tree is a partial order such that the set of elements larger that any element is linearly ordered and any two elements have an upper-bound. Finite or infinite rooted trees ordered by the ancestor relation are order-theoretic trees. In an order-theoretic tree, B(x,y,z) means that x<y<z or z<y<x or x<y≤x⊔z or z<y≤x⊔z, where x⊔z is the least upper-bound of incomparable elements x and z. In a previous article, we established that the corresponding class of betweenness structures is monadic second-order definable.We prove here that the induced substructures of the betweenness structures of the countable order-theoretic trees form a monadic second-order definable class, denoted by IBO. The proof uses a variant of cographs, the partitioned probe cographs, and their known six finite minimal excluded induced subgraphs called the bounds of the class. This proof links two apparently unrelated topics: cographs and order-theoretic trees.However, the class IBO has finitely many bounds, i.e., minimal excluded finite induced substructures. Hence it is first-order definable. The proof of finiteness uses well-quasi-orders and does not provide the finite list of bounds. Hence, the associated first-order defining sentence is not known.https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7288/pdf[info.info-lo]computer science [cs]/logic in computer science [cs.lo] |
spellingShingle | Bruno Courcelle Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science [info.info-lo]computer science [cs]/logic in computer science [cs.lo] |
title | Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees |
title_full | Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees |
title_fullStr | Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees |
title_full_unstemmed | Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees |
title_short | Induced betweenness in order-theoretic trees |
title_sort | induced betweenness in order theoretic trees |
topic | [info.info-lo]computer science [cs]/logic in computer science [cs.lo] |
url | https://dmtcs.episciences.org/7288/pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunocourcelle inducedbetweennessinordertheoretictrees |