Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree Density

As the effects of climate change and urbanisation intensify, liveability and comfort in outdoor spaces decrease. Because of large spaces exposed to solar radiation and low crossing of airflows, courtyard buildings are extremely vulnerable in this regard. However, there are significant gaps in the li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lia Marchi, Jacopo Gaspari, Kristian Fabbri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/11/2687
_version_ 1797459914971414528
author Lia Marchi
Jacopo Gaspari
Kristian Fabbri
author_facet Lia Marchi
Jacopo Gaspari
Kristian Fabbri
author_sort Lia Marchi
collection DOAJ
description As the effects of climate change and urbanisation intensify, liveability and comfort in outdoor spaces decrease. Because of large spaces exposed to solar radiation and low crossing of airflows, courtyard buildings are extremely vulnerable in this regard. However, there are significant gaps in the literature on outdoor comfort in courtyards, especially regarding the effect of border configuration (including gap position and features), as well that of tree density. The study proposes a methodology—to be used during preliminary design—to compare the effect of alternative scenarios for courtyard buildings on outdoor microclimate, varying both the building perimeter configuration and courtyard vegetation layout. A matrix is set to combine the two variables and select relevant scenarios, which are then simulated in ENVI-met focusing on air temperature, wind speed and physiological equivalent temperature (PET). A case study in Bologna, Italy (humid subtropical climate) is presented as an example of the implementation. The resulting outdoor microclimate maps and frequency diagrams are compared and discussed. It emerges that both variables have a role in outdoor comfort: while gap configuration affects air temperature more (up to a difference of 1 °C), tree density impacts PET by up to 2 °C difference. The methodology can be replicated in several other contexts to support the optimisation of courtyard building design from the early stages.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:58:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d8870f74fcf4bc89e0336f9bf2ec721
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:58:42Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-7d8870f74fcf4bc89e0336f9bf2ec7212023-11-24T14:32:59ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092023-10-011311268710.3390/buildings13112687Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree DensityLia Marchi0Jacopo Gaspari1Kristian Fabbri2Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, ItalyAs the effects of climate change and urbanisation intensify, liveability and comfort in outdoor spaces decrease. Because of large spaces exposed to solar radiation and low crossing of airflows, courtyard buildings are extremely vulnerable in this regard. However, there are significant gaps in the literature on outdoor comfort in courtyards, especially regarding the effect of border configuration (including gap position and features), as well that of tree density. The study proposes a methodology—to be used during preliminary design—to compare the effect of alternative scenarios for courtyard buildings on outdoor microclimate, varying both the building perimeter configuration and courtyard vegetation layout. A matrix is set to combine the two variables and select relevant scenarios, which are then simulated in ENVI-met focusing on air temperature, wind speed and physiological equivalent temperature (PET). A case study in Bologna, Italy (humid subtropical climate) is presented as an example of the implementation. The resulting outdoor microclimate maps and frequency diagrams are compared and discussed. It emerges that both variables have a role in outdoor comfort: while gap configuration affects air temperature more (up to a difference of 1 °C), tree density impacts PET by up to 2 °C difference. The methodology can be replicated in several other contexts to support the optimisation of courtyard building design from the early stages.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/11/2687outdoor microclimate mapoutdoor thermal comfortENVI-metair temperaturewind speedPET
spellingShingle Lia Marchi
Jacopo Gaspari
Kristian Fabbri
Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree Density
Buildings
outdoor microclimate map
outdoor thermal comfort
ENVI-met
air temperature
wind speed
PET
title Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree Density
title_full Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree Density
title_fullStr Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree Density
title_full_unstemmed Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree Density
title_short Outdoor Microclimate in Courtyard Buildings: Impact of Building Perimeter Configuration and Tree Density
title_sort outdoor microclimate in courtyard buildings impact of building perimeter configuration and tree density
topic outdoor microclimate map
outdoor thermal comfort
ENVI-met
air temperature
wind speed
PET
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/11/2687
work_keys_str_mv AT liamarchi outdoormicroclimateincourtyardbuildingsimpactofbuildingperimeterconfigurationandtreedensity
AT jacopogaspari outdoormicroclimateincourtyardbuildingsimpactofbuildingperimeterconfigurationandtreedensity
AT kristianfabbri outdoormicroclimateincourtyardbuildingsimpactofbuildingperimeterconfigurationandtreedensity