Application of Four Different Models for Predicting the High-Temperature Flow Behavior of 1420 Al–Li Alloy

In this paper, the high-temperature rheological behavior of 1420 aluminum–lithium alloy under experimental conditions (temperatures of 350–475 °C and strain rates of 0.01–10 s<sup>−1</sup>) was systematically investigated using a Gleeble-3500 thermal simulation tester (temperature 350~47...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuyan Yang, Xiaohui Dong, Teng Zhao, Zhou Zhou, Yu Qiu, Fei Wang, Rui Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Metals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/12/12/2029
_version_ 1797456329617440768
author Yuyan Yang
Xiaohui Dong
Teng Zhao
Zhou Zhou
Yu Qiu
Fei Wang
Rui Luo
author_facet Yuyan Yang
Xiaohui Dong
Teng Zhao
Zhou Zhou
Yu Qiu
Fei Wang
Rui Luo
author_sort Yuyan Yang
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, the high-temperature rheological behavior of 1420 aluminum–lithium alloy under experimental conditions (temperatures of 350–475 °C and strain rates of 0.01–10 s<sup>−1</sup>) was systematically investigated using a Gleeble-3500 thermal simulation tester (temperature 350~475 °C, strain rate of 0.01~10 s<sup>−1</sup>). Based on the flow stress curves of this alloy, four different types of high-temperature constitutive models of the alloy were constructed: the Arrhenius (AR) model, the Modified Johnson–Cook (MJC) model, the Modified Zerilli–Armstrong (MZA) model, and the VOCE model. The prediction accuracy of the four constitutive models was compared, and the response of the accuracy of the four constitutive models to the deformation parameters (temperature, deformation rate, and strain) was analyzed. The results showed that the VOCE, AR, and MZA models had high overall prediction accuracy with average absolute relative error (AARE) of 1.8933%, 3.9912%, and 7.8422%, respectively. The VOCE model could achieve the prediction of large strain deformation resistance under small strain with small batch experimental conditions for the corresponding conditions. The AR model had optimal prediction accuracy for the high-rate deformation process. The MJC model had the optimal prediction accuracy for the low-temperature low-rate deformation process. The MZA model had better prediction accuracy for the low-rate high-temperature deformation process. The 1420 aluminum–lithium alloy process parameters selection area constitutive model matching diagram was constructed.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:06:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d977cc9066e40a3a2a189112339342b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4701
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:06:14Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Metals
spelling doaj.art-7d977cc9066e40a3a2a189112339342b2023-11-24T16:39:39ZengMDPI AGMetals2075-47012022-11-011212202910.3390/met12122029Application of Four Different Models for Predicting the High-Temperature Flow Behavior of 1420 Al–Li AlloyYuyan Yang0Xiaohui Dong1Teng Zhao2Zhou Zhou3Yu Qiu4Fei Wang5Rui Luo6School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaAVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing 100024, ChinaSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaIn this paper, the high-temperature rheological behavior of 1420 aluminum–lithium alloy under experimental conditions (temperatures of 350–475 °C and strain rates of 0.01–10 s<sup>−1</sup>) was systematically investigated using a Gleeble-3500 thermal simulation tester (temperature 350~475 °C, strain rate of 0.01~10 s<sup>−1</sup>). Based on the flow stress curves of this alloy, four different types of high-temperature constitutive models of the alloy were constructed: the Arrhenius (AR) model, the Modified Johnson–Cook (MJC) model, the Modified Zerilli–Armstrong (MZA) model, and the VOCE model. The prediction accuracy of the four constitutive models was compared, and the response of the accuracy of the four constitutive models to the deformation parameters (temperature, deformation rate, and strain) was analyzed. The results showed that the VOCE, AR, and MZA models had high overall prediction accuracy with average absolute relative error (AARE) of 1.8933%, 3.9912%, and 7.8422%, respectively. The VOCE model could achieve the prediction of large strain deformation resistance under small strain with small batch experimental conditions for the corresponding conditions. The AR model had optimal prediction accuracy for the high-rate deformation process. The MJC model had the optimal prediction accuracy for the low-temperature low-rate deformation process. The MZA model had better prediction accuracy for the low-rate high-temperature deformation process. The 1420 aluminum–lithium alloy process parameters selection area constitutive model matching diagram was constructed.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/12/12/20291420 aluminum–lithium alloyAR modelMJC modelMZA modelVOCE modelconstitutive equation
spellingShingle Yuyan Yang
Xiaohui Dong
Teng Zhao
Zhou Zhou
Yu Qiu
Fei Wang
Rui Luo
Application of Four Different Models for Predicting the High-Temperature Flow Behavior of 1420 Al–Li Alloy
Metals
1420 aluminum–lithium alloy
AR model
MJC model
MZA model
VOCE model
constitutive equation
title Application of Four Different Models for Predicting the High-Temperature Flow Behavior of 1420 Al–Li Alloy
title_full Application of Four Different Models for Predicting the High-Temperature Flow Behavior of 1420 Al–Li Alloy
title_fullStr Application of Four Different Models for Predicting the High-Temperature Flow Behavior of 1420 Al–Li Alloy
title_full_unstemmed Application of Four Different Models for Predicting the High-Temperature Flow Behavior of 1420 Al–Li Alloy
title_short Application of Four Different Models for Predicting the High-Temperature Flow Behavior of 1420 Al–Li Alloy
title_sort application of four different models for predicting the high temperature flow behavior of 1420 al li alloy
topic 1420 aluminum–lithium alloy
AR model
MJC model
MZA model
VOCE model
constitutive equation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/12/12/2029
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyanyang applicationoffourdifferentmodelsforpredictingthehightemperatureflowbehaviorof1420allialloy
AT xiaohuidong applicationoffourdifferentmodelsforpredictingthehightemperatureflowbehaviorof1420allialloy
AT tengzhao applicationoffourdifferentmodelsforpredictingthehightemperatureflowbehaviorof1420allialloy
AT zhouzhou applicationoffourdifferentmodelsforpredictingthehightemperatureflowbehaviorof1420allialloy
AT yuqiu applicationoffourdifferentmodelsforpredictingthehightemperatureflowbehaviorof1420allialloy
AT feiwang applicationoffourdifferentmodelsforpredictingthehightemperatureflowbehaviorof1420allialloy
AT ruiluo applicationoffourdifferentmodelsforpredictingthehightemperatureflowbehaviorof1420allialloy