Prognostic value of Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromes

Introduction: Identifying reperfusion and predicting post procedure risk is important following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI). An Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) combining TIMI flow (TFG) and myocardial perfusion (TMPG) grades before and after PCI can accurately measure both epicardia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V.S. Narain, L. Fischer, A. Puri, R. Sethi, S.K. Dwivedi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-01-01
Series:Indian Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483212003215
_version_ 1819093669520605184
author V.S. Narain
L. Fischer
A. Puri
R. Sethi
S.K. Dwivedi
author_facet V.S. Narain
L. Fischer
A. Puri
R. Sethi
S.K. Dwivedi
author_sort V.S. Narain
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Identifying reperfusion and predicting post procedure risk is important following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI). An Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) combining TIMI flow (TFG) and myocardial perfusion (TMPG) grades before and after PCI can accurately measure both epicardial and myocardial perfusion and predict Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE). Patients and methods: APS was calculated in 226 (88 ST elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) and 138 Non STEMI) patients. Maximum score being 12, reperfusion was defined as failed: 0–3, partial: 4–9, and full APS: 10–12. Thirty day MACE were observed. Results: APS identified reperfusion significantly more than TMPG alone (STEMI: 50.6% vs 11.8% (p < 0.001); Non STEMI, early reperfusion: 69.4% vs 52.8% (p < 0.01) and Non STEMI late reperfusion: 38.2% vs 7.8%; (p ≤ 0.001) respectively. A significantly lower incidence of MACE was observed in the full as compared to the failed APS group (1.8% vs 22.5%) (p < 0.001). No differences were noted between TMPG 0–2 (9.8%, 9.4%, 7.3%, respectively) (p = NS). Conclusion: Compared to MPG alone APS detects more low risk reperfused patients, post PCI.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T23:15:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7d9b73a4f0d5458a94fbd62b86627aec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0019-4832
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T23:15:11Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Indian Heart Journal
spelling doaj.art-7d9b73a4f0d5458a94fbd62b86627aec2022-12-21T18:46:56ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322013-01-016511610.1016/j.ihj.2012.12.020Prognostic value of Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromesV.S. Narain0L. Fischer1A. Puri2R. Sethi3S.K. Dwivedi4Professor, Department of Cardiology, CSM Medical University (Upgraded K.G.'s Medical University), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaSenior Resident, Department of Cardiology, CSM Medical University (Upgraded K.G.'s Medical University), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaAssistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, CSM Medical University (Upgraded K.G.'s Medical University), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaAssistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, CSM Medical University (Upgraded K.G.'s Medical University), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaProfessor, Department of Cardiology, CSM Medical University (Upgraded K.G.'s Medical University), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaIntroduction: Identifying reperfusion and predicting post procedure risk is important following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI). An Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) combining TIMI flow (TFG) and myocardial perfusion (TMPG) grades before and after PCI can accurately measure both epicardial and myocardial perfusion and predict Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE). Patients and methods: APS was calculated in 226 (88 ST elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) and 138 Non STEMI) patients. Maximum score being 12, reperfusion was defined as failed: 0–3, partial: 4–9, and full APS: 10–12. Thirty day MACE were observed. Results: APS identified reperfusion significantly more than TMPG alone (STEMI: 50.6% vs 11.8% (p < 0.001); Non STEMI, early reperfusion: 69.4% vs 52.8% (p < 0.01) and Non STEMI late reperfusion: 38.2% vs 7.8%; (p ≤ 0.001) respectively. A significantly lower incidence of MACE was observed in the full as compared to the failed APS group (1.8% vs 22.5%) (p < 0.001). No differences were noted between TMPG 0–2 (9.8%, 9.4%, 7.3%, respectively) (p = NS). Conclusion: Compared to MPG alone APS detects more low risk reperfused patients, post PCI.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483212003215Angiographic Perfusion ScoreTIMI perfusion gradeMajor adverse coronary eventsAcute coronary syndromes
spellingShingle V.S. Narain
L. Fischer
A. Puri
R. Sethi
S.K. Dwivedi
Prognostic value of Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromes
Indian Heart Journal
Angiographic Perfusion Score
TIMI perfusion grade
Major adverse coronary events
Acute coronary syndromes
title Prognostic value of Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromes
title_full Prognostic value of Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromes
title_fullStr Prognostic value of Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromes
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromes
title_short Prognostic value of Angiographic Perfusion Score (APS) following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromes
title_sort prognostic value of angiographic perfusion score aps following percutaneous interventions in acute coronary syndromes
topic Angiographic Perfusion Score
TIMI perfusion grade
Major adverse coronary events
Acute coronary syndromes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483212003215
work_keys_str_mv AT vsnarain prognosticvalueofangiographicperfusionscoreapsfollowingpercutaneousinterventionsinacutecoronarysyndromes
AT lfischer prognosticvalueofangiographicperfusionscoreapsfollowingpercutaneousinterventionsinacutecoronarysyndromes
AT apuri prognosticvalueofangiographicperfusionscoreapsfollowingpercutaneousinterventionsinacutecoronarysyndromes
AT rsethi prognosticvalueofangiographicperfusionscoreapsfollowingpercutaneousinterventionsinacutecoronarysyndromes
AT skdwivedi prognosticvalueofangiographicperfusionscoreapsfollowingpercutaneousinterventionsinacutecoronarysyndromes