Puerto Rico Before the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Colonialism in Action
The United States Supreme Court’s October 2015 Term will go down in history as the most significant one for Puerto Rico-United States relations in more than a century. By opting to address the issues presented in Puerto Rico v. Sánchez Valle, a constitutional case arising from the Commonwealth cour...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Columbia University Libraries
2016-12-01
|
| Series: | Columbia Journal of Race and Law |
| Online Access: | https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/2321 |
| _version_ | 1819177756487843840 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrés González Berdecía |
| author_facet | Andrés González Berdecía |
| author_sort | Andrés González Berdecía |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The United States Supreme Court’s October 2015 Term will go down in history as the most significant one for Puerto Rico-United States relations in more than a century. By opting to address the issues presented in Puerto Rico v. Sánchez Valle, a constitutional case arising from the Commonwealth courts, and Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, a statutory case arising from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, the answer to which directly related to one’s understanding of the nature of the political status between Puerto Rico and the United States, the United States Supreme Court set in motion a series of unprecedented actions by the Commonwealth government, the President, Congress, Commonwealth and federal judges, and civil society in general—both in San Juan and Washington, D.C.—that illustrate, now more clearly than ever, why Puerto Rico legally remains a 21st century colony of the United States.
Part II of this Article will discuss Puerto Rico v. Sánchez Valle, setting forth the underlying facts of the case, the legal issues presented, what Puerto Rico courts held, and what the United States Supreme Court ultimately decided. Part III will focus on Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax Free Trust, following the same basic structure. Part IV will illustrate how both cases reveal unequivocally that the United States’ legal treatment of Puerto Rico amounts to pure colonialism. Finally, Part V will conclude by analyzing whether the Supreme Court of the United States can, or should, take action to fix this reality. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:31:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7d9da8e79d8d4528967ac5d156bb276d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2155-2401 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:31:43Z |
| publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
| publisher | Columbia University Libraries |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Columbia Journal of Race and Law |
| spelling | doaj.art-7d9da8e79d8d4528967ac5d156bb276d2022-12-21T18:11:54ZengColumbia University LibrariesColumbia Journal of Race and Law2155-24012016-12-017110.7916/cjrl.v7i1.2321Puerto Rico Before the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Colonialism in ActionAndrés González BerdecíaThe United States Supreme Court’s October 2015 Term will go down in history as the most significant one for Puerto Rico-United States relations in more than a century. By opting to address the issues presented in Puerto Rico v. Sánchez Valle, a constitutional case arising from the Commonwealth courts, and Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, a statutory case arising from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, the answer to which directly related to one’s understanding of the nature of the political status between Puerto Rico and the United States, the United States Supreme Court set in motion a series of unprecedented actions by the Commonwealth government, the President, Congress, Commonwealth and federal judges, and civil society in general—both in San Juan and Washington, D.C.—that illustrate, now more clearly than ever, why Puerto Rico legally remains a 21st century colony of the United States. Part II of this Article will discuss Puerto Rico v. Sánchez Valle, setting forth the underlying facts of the case, the legal issues presented, what Puerto Rico courts held, and what the United States Supreme Court ultimately decided. Part III will focus on Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax Free Trust, following the same basic structure. Part IV will illustrate how both cases reveal unequivocally that the United States’ legal treatment of Puerto Rico amounts to pure colonialism. Finally, Part V will conclude by analyzing whether the Supreme Court of the United States can, or should, take action to fix this reality.https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/2321 |
| spellingShingle | Andrés González Berdecía Puerto Rico Before the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Colonialism in Action Columbia Journal of Race and Law |
| title | Puerto Rico Before the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Colonialism in Action |
| title_full | Puerto Rico Before the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Colonialism in Action |
| title_fullStr | Puerto Rico Before the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Colonialism in Action |
| title_full_unstemmed | Puerto Rico Before the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Colonialism in Action |
| title_short | Puerto Rico Before the Supreme Court of the United States: Constitutional Colonialism in Action |
| title_sort | puerto rico before the supreme court of the united states constitutional colonialism in action |
| url | https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjrl/article/view/2321 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andresgonzalezberdecia puertoricobeforethesupremecourtoftheunitedstatesconstitutionalcolonialisminaction |