Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report

Abstract Plastic surgical reconstruction is considered to be the gold standard for the repair of microtia as the results are permanent and constructed from the patient’s own tissue; however, the multiple surgeries required and the difficulty in attaining adequate cosmetic results often result in pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vladimir Frias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-06-01
Series:International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00337-8
_version_ 1830084573277454336
author Vladimir Frias
author_facet Vladimir Frias
author_sort Vladimir Frias
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Plastic surgical reconstruction is considered to be the gold standard for the repair of microtia as the results are permanent and constructed from the patient’s own tissue; however, the multiple surgeries required and the difficulty in attaining adequate cosmetic results often result in patients choosing a prosthesis as a long-term rehabilitation. Advances in osseointegration in the craniofacial region have improved the outcomes with auricular prosthetics by providing a reliable method of attachment of the prosthesis and increasing patient acceptance. A case presentation illustrates the results of both treatment modalities and examines the outcomes on the same patient.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T16:44:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7da1369ecb6a4cfb92b7ec6acef10dcd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2198-4034
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T16:44:52Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of Implant Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-7da1369ecb6a4cfb92b7ec6acef10dcd2022-12-21T22:54:13ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry2198-40342021-06-01711710.1186/s40729-021-00337-8Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case reportVladimir Frias0Department of Oral Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterAbstract Plastic surgical reconstruction is considered to be the gold standard for the repair of microtia as the results are permanent and constructed from the patient’s own tissue; however, the multiple surgeries required and the difficulty in attaining adequate cosmetic results often result in patients choosing a prosthesis as a long-term rehabilitation. Advances in osseointegration in the craniofacial region have improved the outcomes with auricular prosthetics by providing a reliable method of attachment of the prosthesis and increasing patient acceptance. A case presentation illustrates the results of both treatment modalities and examines the outcomes on the same patient.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00337-8MicrotiaCraniofacial implantsAuricular prosthesis
spellingShingle Vladimir Frias
Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Microtia
Craniofacial implants
Auricular prosthesis
title Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report
title_full Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report
title_fullStr Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report
title_short Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report
title_sort craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia a case report
topic Microtia
Craniofacial implants
Auricular prosthesis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00337-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vladimirfrias craniofacialimplantsinafailedautologousreconstructionofmicrotiaacasereport