Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report
Abstract Plastic surgical reconstruction is considered to be the gold standard for the repair of microtia as the results are permanent and constructed from the patient’s own tissue; however, the multiple surgeries required and the difficulty in attaining adequate cosmetic results often result in pat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2021-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Implant Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00337-8 |
_version_ | 1830084573277454336 |
---|---|
author | Vladimir Frias |
author_facet | Vladimir Frias |
author_sort | Vladimir Frias |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Plastic surgical reconstruction is considered to be the gold standard for the repair of microtia as the results are permanent and constructed from the patient’s own tissue; however, the multiple surgeries required and the difficulty in attaining adequate cosmetic results often result in patients choosing a prosthesis as a long-term rehabilitation. Advances in osseointegration in the craniofacial region have improved the outcomes with auricular prosthetics by providing a reliable method of attachment of the prosthesis and increasing patient acceptance. A case presentation illustrates the results of both treatment modalities and examines the outcomes on the same patient. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T16:44:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7da1369ecb6a4cfb92b7ec6acef10dcd |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2198-4034 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T16:44:52Z |
publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Implant Dentistry |
spelling | doaj.art-7da1369ecb6a4cfb92b7ec6acef10dcd2022-12-21T22:54:13ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry2198-40342021-06-01711710.1186/s40729-021-00337-8Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case reportVladimir Frias0Department of Oral Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterAbstract Plastic surgical reconstruction is considered to be the gold standard for the repair of microtia as the results are permanent and constructed from the patient’s own tissue; however, the multiple surgeries required and the difficulty in attaining adequate cosmetic results often result in patients choosing a prosthesis as a long-term rehabilitation. Advances in osseointegration in the craniofacial region have improved the outcomes with auricular prosthetics by providing a reliable method of attachment of the prosthesis and increasing patient acceptance. A case presentation illustrates the results of both treatment modalities and examines the outcomes on the same patient.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00337-8MicrotiaCraniofacial implantsAuricular prosthesis |
spellingShingle | Vladimir Frias Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report International Journal of Implant Dentistry Microtia Craniofacial implants Auricular prosthesis |
title | Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report |
title_full | Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report |
title_fullStr | Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report |
title_short | Craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia: a case report |
title_sort | craniofacial implants in a failed autologous reconstruction of microtia a case report |
topic | Microtia Craniofacial implants Auricular prosthesis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00337-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vladimirfrias craniofacialimplantsinafailedautologousreconstructionofmicrotiaacasereport |