Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research
This response to Julie Martin and Chavone Garza’s article published in Studies in Engineering Education, “Centering the Marginalized Student’s Voice Through Autoethnography: Implications for Engineering Education Research,” discusses considerations in the process of research, particularly for white...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
VT Publishing
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Studies in Engineering Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.seejournal.org/articles/64 |
| _version_ | 1811260167459700736 |
|---|---|
| author | Allison Godwin |
| author_facet | Allison Godwin |
| author_sort | Allison Godwin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This response to Julie Martin and Chavone Garza’s article published in Studies in Engineering Education, “Centering the Marginalized Student’s Voice Through Autoethnography: Implications for Engineering Education Research,” discusses considerations in the process of research, particularly for white researchers. This reflection draws on coloring epistemologies and white supremacy characteristics to re-examine questions of how quantitative research paradigms can be challenged. Reflection on how the process and product of Martin and Garza’s article changed the way the author thinks about her research and begins to raise points of conversation for white researchers engaged in quantitative and mixed methods work. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:43:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7dc2b970d5fb43418ca4a2e8e094fe0d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2690-5450 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:43:30Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | VT Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studies in Engineering Education |
| spelling | doaj.art-7dc2b970d5fb43418ca4a2e8e094fe0d2022-12-22T03:20:42ZengVT PublishingStudies in Engineering Education2690-54502020-12-011110.21061/see.646Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative ResearchAllison Godwin0Purdue UniversityThis response to Julie Martin and Chavone Garza’s article published in Studies in Engineering Education, “Centering the Marginalized Student’s Voice Through Autoethnography: Implications for Engineering Education Research,” discusses considerations in the process of research, particularly for white researchers. This reflection draws on coloring epistemologies and white supremacy characteristics to re-examine questions of how quantitative research paradigms can be challenged. Reflection on how the process and product of Martin and Garza’s article changed the way the author thinks about her research and begins to raise points of conversation for white researchers engaged in quantitative and mixed methods work.https://www.seejournal.org/articles/64quantitative methodsbiasresearch paradigms |
| spellingShingle | Allison Godwin Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research Studies in Engineering Education quantitative methods bias research paradigms |
| title | Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research |
| title_full | Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research |
| title_fullStr | Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research |
| title_short | Sitting in the Tensions: Challenging Whiteness in Quantitative Research |
| title_sort | sitting in the tensions challenging whiteness in quantitative research |
| topic | quantitative methods bias research paradigms |
| url | https://www.seejournal.org/articles/64 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT allisongodwin sittinginthetensionschallengingwhitenessinquantitativeresearch |