The antisaccade task: visual distractors elicit a location-independent planning 'cost'.
The presentation of a remote - but not proximal - distractor concurrent with target onset increases prosaccade reaction times (RT) (i.e., the remote distractor effect: RDE). The competitive integration model asserts that the RDE represents the time required to resolve the conflict for a common sacca...
Main Authors: | Jesse C DeSimone, Stefan Everling, Matthew Heath |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122345 |
Similar Items
-
Pro- and antisaccades in children elicited by visual and acoustic targets - does modality matter?
by: Goepel Johanna, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
ANTISACCADE TASK AS A BIOMARKER IN MND
by: Sharma, R, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Pro- and antisaccade task-switching: response suppression-and not vector inversion-contributes to a task-set inertia
by: Tari, B, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Statistical learning of distractor locations is dependent on task context
by: Jasper de Waard, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Influence of stimulus eccentricity and direction on characteristics of pro- and antisaccades in non-human primates.
by: Bell, A, et al.
Published: (2000)