African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021

The two waves of reflexivity in archaeology are the identity politics of archaeologists and stakeholder politics. These social issues are considered in this article through the perspective of three African archaeological journals produced from 2014 to 2021. Identity politics is examined through a qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cheryl Claassen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Humans
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9461/3/1/4
_version_ 1797611385352355840
author Cheryl Claassen
author_facet Cheryl Claassen
author_sort Cheryl Claassen
collection DOAJ
description The two waves of reflexivity in archaeology are the identity politics of archaeologists and stakeholder politics. These social issues are considered in this article through the perspective of three African archaeological journals produced from 2014 to 2021. Identity politics is examined through a quantitative analysis of authorship, book reviewing, and the countries covered. I conclude that parity of gender authorship—assuming 61% male and 39% female archaeologists—has been achieved by the <i>African Archaeological Review</i>, <i>Journal of African Archaeology</i>, and <i>Azania</i>. In book reviewing, this is less so. The geographical coverage across the three journals shows lacunae. Stakeholder politics is most visible in book reviews and special issues. Journal ethics and goals and the final topics of open access and other ways of broadening the pool of authors, reviewers, and accessibility are offered.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:28:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7dcd1628e5e447a89d8e4e4672a6a29d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-9461
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:28:08Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Humans
spelling doaj.art-7dcd1628e5e447a89d8e4e4672a6a29d2023-11-17T11:25:19ZengMDPI AGHumans2673-94612023-01-0131253510.3390/humans3010004African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021Cheryl Claassen0Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28607, USAThe two waves of reflexivity in archaeology are the identity politics of archaeologists and stakeholder politics. These social issues are considered in this article through the perspective of three African archaeological journals produced from 2014 to 2021. Identity politics is examined through a quantitative analysis of authorship, book reviewing, and the countries covered. I conclude that parity of gender authorship—assuming 61% male and 39% female archaeologists—has been achieved by the <i>African Archaeological Review</i>, <i>Journal of African Archaeology</i>, and <i>Azania</i>. In book reviewing, this is less so. The geographical coverage across the three journals shows lacunae. Stakeholder politics is most visible in book reviews and special issues. Journal ethics and goals and the final topics of open access and other ways of broadening the pool of authors, reviewers, and accessibility are offered.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9461/3/1/4Africajournalsbook reviewsethicsgenderidentity politics
spellingShingle Cheryl Claassen
African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021
Humans
Africa
journals
book reviews
ethics
gender
identity politics
title African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021
title_full African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021
title_fullStr African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021
title_full_unstemmed African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021
title_short African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021
title_sort african archaeological journals and social issues 2014 2021
topic Africa
journals
book reviews
ethics
gender
identity politics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9461/3/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT cherylclaassen africanarchaeologicaljournalsandsocialissues20142021