Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries

Background: The most frequently utilized approach in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb procedures is spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of isobaric bupivacaine and isobaric l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chinthavali Sujatha, Chandraleela Sundararajan, Arthi Asokan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 2022-09-01
Series:Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/46975
_version_ 1818008071482376192
author Chinthavali Sujatha
Chandraleela Sundararajan
Arthi Asokan
author_facet Chinthavali Sujatha
Chandraleela Sundararajan
Arthi Asokan
author_sort Chinthavali Sujatha
collection DOAJ
description Background: The most frequently utilized approach in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb procedures is spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of isobaric bupivacaine and isobaric levobupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In our study, 80 patients (43 – male and 37 – female) between the ages of 18 and 70 years at Sri Venkateswaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry, were enrolled and split into Group I and Group II following approval by an ethical committee and written informed consent. Individuals in Group I were given 3 mL of preservative free 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine (Anawin™, bupivacaine hydrochloride, Neon laboratories, India), and Group II patients were given 3 mL of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine (Levoanawin™, levobupivacaine hydrochloride, Neon laboratories, India) for spinal anesthesia. A complete preanesthetic checkup was performed the day before surgery. Results: In this study, we observed no significant correlation between height, weight, and surgery duration. We discovered a statistically substantial distinction in motor and sensory blockade between the bupivacaine (Group I) and levobupivacaine (Group II) groups. In this study, Group I (50% of patients) had a lower occurrence of hypotension than Group II (20% of patients), indicating a statistically significant variation between the groups. Conclusion: When compared to levobupivacaine, individuals in the bupivacaine group required more administration of the vasoactive medicine ephedrine and the sympathomimetic drug atropine. Levobupivacaine is less cardiotoxic, neurotoxic, and equally potent local anesthetic compared to its racemate.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:24:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7dcdcf666ad14d33827b1e69558241d1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2467-9100
2091-0576
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:24:25Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-7dcdcf666ad14d33827b1e69558241d12022-12-22T02:10:02ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762022-09-011395762https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i9.46975Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeriesChinthavali Sujatha 0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8003-3544Chandraleela Sundararajan 1Arthi Asokan 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-7065Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Venkateswaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry, India Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Venkateswaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry, IndiaAssociate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Venkateswaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry, India Background: The most frequently utilized approach in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb procedures is spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of isobaric bupivacaine and isobaric levobupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In our study, 80 patients (43 – male and 37 – female) between the ages of 18 and 70 years at Sri Venkateswaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry, were enrolled and split into Group I and Group II following approval by an ethical committee and written informed consent. Individuals in Group I were given 3 mL of preservative free 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine (Anawin™, bupivacaine hydrochloride, Neon laboratories, India), and Group II patients were given 3 mL of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine (Levoanawin™, levobupivacaine hydrochloride, Neon laboratories, India) for spinal anesthesia. A complete preanesthetic checkup was performed the day before surgery. Results: In this study, we observed no significant correlation between height, weight, and surgery duration. We discovered a statistically substantial distinction in motor and sensory blockade between the bupivacaine (Group I) and levobupivacaine (Group II) groups. In this study, Group I (50% of patients) had a lower occurrence of hypotension than Group II (20% of patients), indicating a statistically significant variation between the groups. Conclusion: When compared to levobupivacaine, individuals in the bupivacaine group required more administration of the vasoactive medicine ephedrine and the sympathomimetic drug atropine. Levobupivacaine is less cardiotoxic, neurotoxic, and equally potent local anesthetic compared to its racemate.https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/46975spinal anesthesia; bupivacaine; levobupivacaine
spellingShingle Chinthavali Sujatha
Chandraleela Sundararajan
Arthi Asokan
Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
spinal anesthesia; bupivacaine; levobupivacaine
title Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries
title_full Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries
title_short Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries
title_sort comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine versus intrathecal isobaric levobupivacaine in the lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries
topic spinal anesthesia; bupivacaine; levobupivacaine
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/46975
work_keys_str_mv AT chinthavalisujatha comparativeevaluationofanestheticefficacyandhemodynamiceffectsofintrathecalisobaricbupivacaineversusintrathecalisobariclevobupivacaineinthelowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries
AT chandraleelasundararajan comparativeevaluationofanestheticefficacyandhemodynamiceffectsofintrathecalisobaricbupivacaineversusintrathecalisobariclevobupivacaineinthelowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries
AT arthiasokan comparativeevaluationofanestheticefficacyandhemodynamiceffectsofintrathecalisobaricbupivacaineversusintrathecalisobariclevobupivacaineinthelowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries