Comment on Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?
In their recent review, ‘Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?,’ Johannessen and Macdonald ( 2016 ) invoke the prospect of carbon offset-credit over-allocation by the Verified Carbon Standard as a pretense for their concerns about published seagrass carbon burial rate...
Main Authors: | Matthew P J Oreska, Karen J McGlathery, Igino M Emmer, Brian A Needelman, Stephen Emmett-Mattox, Stephen Crooks, J Patrick Megonigal, Doug Myers |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IOP Publishing
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Environmental Research Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaae72 |
Similar Items
-
Reply to Oreska et al ‘Comment on Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?’
by: Sophia C Johannessen, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Reply to Macreadie et al Comment on ‘Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?’
by: Sophia C Johannessen, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?
by: Sophia C Johannessen, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
A novel subsurface sediment plate method for quantifying sediment accumulation and erosion in seagrass meadows
by: Carolyn J. Ewers Lewis, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Comment on ‘Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?’
by: Peter I Macreadie, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)