Review: Ming-sum Tsui (2005). Social Work Supervision. Context and Concepts

Supervision in professional organizations is a task that was focused on during the late 20th century. The view of a professional as having a certain amount of everlasting knowledge and skills has changed to a view where the profession is constructed in everyday practice in a cultural context. With t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laila Niklasson
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2006-05-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/154
_version_ 1831628935812612096
author Laila Niklasson
author_facet Laila Niklasson
author_sort Laila Niklasson
collection DOAJ
description Supervision in professional organizations is a task that was focused on during the late 20th century. The view of a professional as having a certain amount of everlasting knowledge and skills has changed to a view where the profession is constructed in everyday practice in a cultural context. With this later view supervision is an important part in the construction of the profession. Supervision is especially worthwhile problematizing when the profession includes day-to-day meetings with, for example, clients. In Social Work Supervision the history of supervision is described and theoretical models constituting supervision are presented. Different modes of the interaction between the supervisee and the supervisor are problematized. The context of the supervision can affect whether the focus is on the administrative, educational or the supportive function. Whatever the function the supervision includes stages, strategies and skills for the supervisee as well as for the supervisor. In a strictly structured and informative argument TSUI argues the importance of highlighting both the practice and theory of supervision, and addresses several actors. As the author mentions, supervision is interrelational and contextual and, therefore, my suggestion is that the discussion addresses questions that are relevant for those already in a profession (social worker, social work teachers, managers and decision makers in organizations). For those who are already professionals, in any respect, TSUI's arguments provide fruit for discussion in an organizational setting. The holistic, cultural perspective for which TSUI is arguing also suggests a research perspective. To this I would add that supervision can be discussed in the context of research into professionalism and lifelong learning. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0603239
first_indexed 2024-12-19T01:51:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7dfb5112dcf74ecebd2bbfd6c014a3d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1438-5627
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-19T01:51:37Z
publishDate 2006-05-01
publisher FQS
record_format Article
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
spelling doaj.art-7dfb5112dcf74ecebd2bbfd6c014a3d42022-12-21T20:41:26ZdeuFQSForum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272006-05-0173153Review: Ming-sum Tsui (2005). Social Work Supervision. Context and ConceptsLaila Niklasson0Mälardalen UniversitySupervision in professional organizations is a task that was focused on during the late 20th century. The view of a professional as having a certain amount of everlasting knowledge and skills has changed to a view where the profession is constructed in everyday practice in a cultural context. With this later view supervision is an important part in the construction of the profession. Supervision is especially worthwhile problematizing when the profession includes day-to-day meetings with, for example, clients. In Social Work Supervision the history of supervision is described and theoretical models constituting supervision are presented. Different modes of the interaction between the supervisee and the supervisor are problematized. The context of the supervision can affect whether the focus is on the administrative, educational or the supportive function. Whatever the function the supervision includes stages, strategies and skills for the supervisee as well as for the supervisor. In a strictly structured and informative argument TSUI argues the importance of highlighting both the practice and theory of supervision, and addresses several actors. As the author mentions, supervision is interrelational and contextual and, therefore, my suggestion is that the discussion addresses questions that are relevant for those already in a profession (social worker, social work teachers, managers and decision makers in organizations). For those who are already professionals, in any respect, TSUI's arguments provide fruit for discussion in an organizational setting. The holistic, cultural perspective for which TSUI is arguing also suggests a research perspective. To this I would add that supervision can be discussed in the context of research into professionalism and lifelong learning. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0603239http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/154professionsocial worksupervisioninteractive processcontextculturepower
spellingShingle Laila Niklasson
Review: Ming-sum Tsui (2005). Social Work Supervision. Context and Concepts
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
profession
social work
supervision
interactive process
context
culture
power
title Review: Ming-sum Tsui (2005). Social Work Supervision. Context and Concepts
title_full Review: Ming-sum Tsui (2005). Social Work Supervision. Context and Concepts
title_fullStr Review: Ming-sum Tsui (2005). Social Work Supervision. Context and Concepts
title_full_unstemmed Review: Ming-sum Tsui (2005). Social Work Supervision. Context and Concepts
title_short Review: Ming-sum Tsui (2005). Social Work Supervision. Context and Concepts
title_sort review ming sum tsui 2005 social work supervision context and concepts
topic profession
social work
supervision
interactive process
context
culture
power
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/154
work_keys_str_mv AT lailaniklasson reviewmingsumtsui2005socialworksupervisioncontextandconcepts