Beyond binaries and before becoming: Reconsidering resistance in UK higher education
Drawing from the tensions within non-representational and human practice perspectives on affect, this paper continues the task of re-conceptualising academic-level resistance in the context of UK higher education. Such re-conceptualisation is underpinned by the belief that illustrating the breadth o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Liverpool John Moores University
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | PRISM |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/index.php/prism/article/view/364 |
| _version_ | 1811155035885666304 |
|---|---|
| author | Mollie Baker |
| author_facet | Mollie Baker |
| author_sort | Mollie Baker |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Drawing from the tensions within non-representational and human practice perspectives on affect, this paper continues the task of re-conceptualising academic-level resistance in the context of UK higher education. Such re-conceptualisation is underpinned by the belief that illustrating the breadth of resistant possibility within and between universities can assist in the development of action against the competitive and for-profit imperatives currently overwhelming this educational sphere. Indeed, while resistance research is increasingly interested in the (dis)connections between overt and “everyday” (Scott, 1985) forms of action (e.g. Contu, 2008; Zembylas, 2019), HE researchers have paid little attention to the latter. Consequently, academic-level resistance remains normatively portrayed as exceptional, novel and less influential than that it rejects. For the sake of contributing a counternarrative, this paper employs a diffractive methodology to examine the affective roles of emotion, meaning making practices and pre-personal factors. By speculating how academic-level resistance derives from not only consciously undertaken cost-benefit analyses but from the entanglement of material and non-material elements, this discussion emphasises the notion of “becoming” and so problematises reductive binaries of overt/covert, high-cost/low-cost, resister/complier. Irrespective of the resounding difficulties that accompany efforts to exploit the affective dimensions of resistance, this emphasis nevertheless situates possibility at the heart of UK higher education and the actions pushing against its neoliberal form. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:26:16Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7dfef3f3d2f5475b91bdc6c92f15345c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2514-5347 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:26:16Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Liverpool John Moores University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PRISM |
| spelling | doaj.art-7dfef3f3d2f5475b91bdc6c92f15345c2023-03-10T10:56:42ZengLiverpool John Moores UniversityPRISM2514-53472023-03-01514862https://doi.org/10.24377/prism.ljmu.0302201Beyond binaries and before becoming: Reconsidering resistance in UK higher educationMollie Baker0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-9222University of Cambridge, Newnham CollegeDrawing from the tensions within non-representational and human practice perspectives on affect, this paper continues the task of re-conceptualising academic-level resistance in the context of UK higher education. Such re-conceptualisation is underpinned by the belief that illustrating the breadth of resistant possibility within and between universities can assist in the development of action against the competitive and for-profit imperatives currently overwhelming this educational sphere. Indeed, while resistance research is increasingly interested in the (dis)connections between overt and “everyday” (Scott, 1985) forms of action (e.g. Contu, 2008; Zembylas, 2019), HE researchers have paid little attention to the latter. Consequently, academic-level resistance remains normatively portrayed as exceptional, novel and less influential than that it rejects. For the sake of contributing a counternarrative, this paper employs a diffractive methodology to examine the affective roles of emotion, meaning making practices and pre-personal factors. By speculating how academic-level resistance derives from not only consciously undertaken cost-benefit analyses but from the entanglement of material and non-material elements, this discussion emphasises the notion of “becoming” and so problematises reductive binaries of overt/covert, high-cost/low-cost, resister/complier. Irrespective of the resounding difficulties that accompany efforts to exploit the affective dimensions of resistance, this emphasis nevertheless situates possibility at the heart of UK higher education and the actions pushing against its neoliberal form.https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/index.php/prism/article/view/364affectresistancehigher educationpoststructuralbinaries |
| spellingShingle | Mollie Baker Beyond binaries and before becoming: Reconsidering resistance in UK higher education PRISM affect resistance higher education poststructural binaries |
| title | Beyond binaries and before becoming: Reconsidering resistance in UK higher education |
| title_full | Beyond binaries and before becoming: Reconsidering resistance in UK higher education |
| title_fullStr | Beyond binaries and before becoming: Reconsidering resistance in UK higher education |
| title_full_unstemmed | Beyond binaries and before becoming: Reconsidering resistance in UK higher education |
| title_short | Beyond binaries and before becoming: Reconsidering resistance in UK higher education |
| title_sort | beyond binaries and before becoming reconsidering resistance in uk higher education |
| topic | affect resistance higher education poststructural binaries |
| url | https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/index.php/prism/article/view/364 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT molliebaker beyondbinariesandbeforebecomingreconsideringresistanceinukhighereducation |