Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocol
Introduction Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary care is needed to examine whether this model of care is achieving its desired outcomes on patient care and health system effectiveness as well as to guide quality improvement initiatives. The aim of this scoping review is to map the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023-05-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/5/e072186.full |
_version_ | 1797816117101592576 |
---|---|
author | Yves Couturier Marie-Ève Poitras Michelle Greiver Nadia Sourial Howard Bergman Rachelle Ashcroft Marie-Thérèse Lussier Catherine Donnelly Janusz Kaczorowski Mylaine Breton Kavita Mehta Monica Aggarwal Sopie Marielle Yapi Jean Noël Nikiema Géraldine Layani Pamela Fernainy Monica McGraw Djims Milius Kevin Samson |
author_facet | Yves Couturier Marie-Ève Poitras Michelle Greiver Nadia Sourial Howard Bergman Rachelle Ashcroft Marie-Thérèse Lussier Catherine Donnelly Janusz Kaczorowski Mylaine Breton Kavita Mehta Monica Aggarwal Sopie Marielle Yapi Jean Noël Nikiema Géraldine Layani Pamela Fernainy Monica McGraw Djims Milius Kevin Samson |
author_sort | Yves Couturier |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary care is needed to examine whether this model of care is achieving its desired outcomes on patient care and health system effectiveness as well as to guide quality improvement initiatives. The aim of this scoping review is to map the literature on primary care performance measurement indicators to determine the extent to which current indicators capture or could be adapted to capture processes, outputs and outcomes that reflect interprofessional primary care.Methods and analysis The review will be guided by the six-stage framework by Arksey and O’Malley (2005). MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, grey literature and the reference list of key studies will be searched to identify any study, published in English or French between 2000 and 2022, related to the concepts of performance indicators, frameworks, interprofessional teams and primary care. Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. Eligible indicators will be classified according to process, output and outcome domains proposed by two validated frameworks. This study started in November 2022 and is expected to be completed by July 2023.Ethics and dissemination This review does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and presentations to stakeholders. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:32:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7e00f4b814454c73b20d76b6ffa3236a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2044-6055 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T08:32:58Z |
publishDate | 2023-05-01 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | Article |
series | BMJ Open |
spelling | doaj.art-7e00f4b814454c73b20d76b6ffa3236a2023-05-31T02:30:06ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552023-05-0113510.1136/bmjopen-2023-072186Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocolYves Couturier0Marie-Ève Poitras1Michelle Greiver2Nadia Sourial3Howard Bergman4Rachelle Ashcroft5Marie-Thérèse Lussier6Catherine Donnelly7Janusz Kaczorowski8Mylaine Breton9Kavita Mehta10Monica Aggarwal11Sopie Marielle Yapi12Jean Noël Nikiema13Géraldine Layani14Pamela Fernainy15Monica McGraw16Djims Milius17Kevin Samson18School of Social Work, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, CanadaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, Research Centre of the CIUSS du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Université de Sherbrooke, Chicoutimi, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaFamily Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaFamily Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaFactor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaFamily and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, CanadaSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen`s University, Kingston, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, University of Montreal Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, CanadaAssociation of Family Health Teams of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Montreal Hospital Centre Research Centre, Montreal, Québec, CanadaDepartment of Health Management, Evaluation & Policy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, CanadaDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, CanadaUniversity of Montreal Hospital Centre Research Centre, Montreal, Québec, CanadaDépartement des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Québec, CanadaUniversity of Montreal Hospital Centre Research Centre, Montreal, Québec, CanadaAssociation of Family Health Teams of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaIntroduction Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary care is needed to examine whether this model of care is achieving its desired outcomes on patient care and health system effectiveness as well as to guide quality improvement initiatives. The aim of this scoping review is to map the literature on primary care performance measurement indicators to determine the extent to which current indicators capture or could be adapted to capture processes, outputs and outcomes that reflect interprofessional primary care.Methods and analysis The review will be guided by the six-stage framework by Arksey and O’Malley (2005). MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, grey literature and the reference list of key studies will be searched to identify any study, published in English or French between 2000 and 2022, related to the concepts of performance indicators, frameworks, interprofessional teams and primary care. Two reviewers will independently screen all abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. Eligible indicators will be classified according to process, output and outcome domains proposed by two validated frameworks. This study started in November 2022 and is expected to be completed by July 2023.Ethics and dissemination This review does not require ethical approval. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and presentations to stakeholders.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/5/e072186.full |
spellingShingle | Yves Couturier Marie-Ève Poitras Michelle Greiver Nadia Sourial Howard Bergman Rachelle Ashcroft Marie-Thérèse Lussier Catherine Donnelly Janusz Kaczorowski Mylaine Breton Kavita Mehta Monica Aggarwal Sopie Marielle Yapi Jean Noël Nikiema Géraldine Layani Pamela Fernainy Monica McGraw Djims Milius Kevin Samson Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocol BMJ Open |
title | Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators a scoping review protocol |
url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/5/e072186.full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yvescouturier identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT marieevepoitras identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT michellegreiver identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT nadiasourial identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT howardbergman identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT rachelleashcroft identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT mariethereselussier identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT catherinedonnelly identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT januszkaczorowski identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT mylainebreton identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT kavitamehta identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT monicaaggarwal identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT sopiemarielleyapi identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT jeannoelnikiema identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT geraldinelayani identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT pamelafernainy identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT monicamcgraw identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT djimsmilius identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol AT kevinsamson identifyandclassifyinterprofessionalprimarycareperformanceindicatorsascopingreviewprotocol |