Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics
I provide responses to what I take to be the most salient aspects of John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel and Luis Vega’s criticisms to the normative model for argumentation that I have developed in Giving Reasons. Each response is articulated on a main question, i....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of the Basque Country
2011-10-01
|
| Series: | Theoria |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/2954 |
| _version_ | 1811229239473602560 |
|---|---|
| author | Lilian Bermejo-Luque |
| author_facet | Lilian Bermejo-Luque |
| author_sort | Lilian Bermejo-Luque |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | I provide responses to what I take to be the most salient aspects of John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel and Luis Vega’s criticisms to the normative model for argumentation that I have developed in Giving Reasons. Each response is articulated on a main question, i.e., the distinction between regulative and constitutive normativity within Argumentation Theory’s models, the semantic appraisal of argumentation, the concept of justification, the differences between Toulmin’s model and my model of argument and the analysis of the pragmatic dimension of argumentation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T10:11:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7e06dfbb7f20467cae9a1d8013aba045 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0495-4548 2171-679X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T10:11:13Z |
| publishDate | 2011-10-01 |
| publisher | University of the Basque Country |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Theoria |
| spelling | doaj.art-7e06dfbb7f20467cae9a1d8013aba0452022-12-22T03:37:19ZengUniversity of the Basque CountryTheoria0495-45482171-679X2011-10-0126332934310.1387/theoria.29542344Exchanging Reasons: responses to criticsLilian Bermejo-LuqueI provide responses to what I take to be the most salient aspects of John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel and Luis Vega’s criticisms to the normative model for argumentation that I have developed in Giving Reasons. Each response is articulated on a main question, i.e., the distinction between regulative and constitutive normativity within Argumentation Theory’s models, the semantic appraisal of argumentation, the concept of justification, the differences between Toulmin’s model and my model of argument and the analysis of the pragmatic dimension of argumentation.http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/2954the concept of justificationconstitutive and regulative normativityinference-claimssemantic appraisaltoulmin’s modelwarrantspragmatic dimension of argumentation |
| spellingShingle | Lilian Bermejo-Luque Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics Theoria the concept of justification constitutive and regulative normativity inference-claims semantic appraisal toulmin’s model warrants pragmatic dimension of argumentation |
| title | Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics |
| title_full | Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics |
| title_fullStr | Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics |
| title_full_unstemmed | Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics |
| title_short | Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics |
| title_sort | exchanging reasons responses to critics |
| topic | the concept of justification constitutive and regulative normativity inference-claims semantic appraisal toulmin’s model warrants pragmatic dimension of argumentation |
| url | http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/2954 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lilianbermejoluque exchangingreasonsresponsestocritics |