Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)

Using measurements of the surface-ocean CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>) and 14 different <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> mapping methods recently collated by the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Rödenbeck, D. C. E. Bakker, N. Gruber, Y. Iida, A. R. Jacobson, S. Jones, P. Landschützer, N. Metzl, S. Nakaoka, A. Olsen, G.-H. Park, P. Peylin, K. B. Rodgers, T. P. Sasse, U. Schuster, J. D. Shutler, V. Valsala, R. Wanninkhof, J. Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-12-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/7251/2015/bg-12-7251-2015.pdf
_version_ 1818235475779911680
author C. Rödenbeck
D. C. E. Bakker
N. Gruber
Y. Iida
A. R. Jacobson
S. Jones
P. Landschützer
N. Metzl
S. Nakaoka
A. Olsen
G.-H. Park
P. Peylin
K. B. Rodgers
T. P. Sasse
U. Schuster
J. D. Shutler
V. Valsala
R. Wanninkhof
J. Zeng
author_facet C. Rödenbeck
D. C. E. Bakker
N. Gruber
Y. Iida
A. R. Jacobson
S. Jones
P. Landschützer
N. Metzl
S. Nakaoka
A. Olsen
G.-H. Park
P. Peylin
K. B. Rodgers
T. P. Sasse
U. Schuster
J. D. Shutler
V. Valsala
R. Wanninkhof
J. Zeng
author_sort C. Rödenbeck
collection DOAJ
description Using measurements of the surface-ocean CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>) and 14 different <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> mapping methods recently collated by the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM) initiative, variations in regional and global sea–air CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes are investigated. Though the available mapping methods use widely different approaches, we find relatively consistent estimates of regional <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> seasonality, in line with previous estimates. In terms of interannual variability (IAV), all mapping methods estimate the largest variations to occur in the eastern equatorial Pacific. Despite considerable spread in the detailed variations, mapping methods that fit the data more closely also tend to agree more closely with each other in regional averages. Encouragingly, this includes mapping methods belonging to complementary types – taking variability either directly from the <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> data or indirectly from driver data via regression. From a weighted ensemble average, we find an IAV amplitude of the global sea–air CO<sub>2</sub> flux of 0.31 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup> (standard deviation over 1992–2009), which is larger than simulated by biogeochemical process models. From a decadal perspective, the global ocean CO<sub>2</sub> uptake is estimated to have gradually increased since about 2000, with little decadal change prior to that. The weighted mean net global ocean CO<sub>2</sub> sink estimated by the SOCOM ensemble is −1.75 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup> (1992–2009), consistent within uncertainties with estimates from ocean-interior carbon data or atmospheric oxygen trends.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T11:54:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e0c435be5214d5a9b07a2a071beb434
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T11:54:34Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-7e0c435be5214d5a9b07a2a071beb4342022-12-22T00:25:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892015-12-0112237251727810.5194/bg-12-7251-2015Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)C. Rödenbeck0D. C. E. Bakker1N. Gruber2Y. Iida3A. R. Jacobson4S. Jones5P. Landschützer6N. Metzl7S. Nakaoka8A. Olsen9G.-H. Park10P. Peylin11K. B. Rodgers12T. P. Sasse13U. Schuster14J. D. Shutler15V. Valsala16R. Wanninkhof17J. Zeng18Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, GermanyCentre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKInstitute for Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, SwitzerlandGlobal Environment and Marine Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, JapanUniversity of Colorado and NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USACollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, UKInstitute for Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, SwitzerlandSorbonne Universités (UPMC, Univ Paris 06)-CNRS-IRD-MNHN, LOCEAN/IPSL Laboratory, Paris, FranceNational Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, JapanGeophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, NorwayEast Sea Research Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Uljin, Republic of KoreaLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), Gif sur Yvette, FranceAtmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, NJ, USAClimate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, UKCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, UKIndian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, IndiaNOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Miami, FL, USANational Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, JapanUsing measurements of the surface-ocean CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (<i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>) and 14 different <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> mapping methods recently collated by the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM) initiative, variations in regional and global sea–air CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes are investigated. Though the available mapping methods use widely different approaches, we find relatively consistent estimates of regional <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> seasonality, in line with previous estimates. In terms of interannual variability (IAV), all mapping methods estimate the largest variations to occur in the eastern equatorial Pacific. Despite considerable spread in the detailed variations, mapping methods that fit the data more closely also tend to agree more closely with each other in regional averages. Encouragingly, this includes mapping methods belonging to complementary types – taking variability either directly from the <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> data or indirectly from driver data via regression. From a weighted ensemble average, we find an IAV amplitude of the global sea–air CO<sub>2</sub> flux of 0.31 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup> (standard deviation over 1992–2009), which is larger than simulated by biogeochemical process models. From a decadal perspective, the global ocean CO<sub>2</sub> uptake is estimated to have gradually increased since about 2000, with little decadal change prior to that. The weighted mean net global ocean CO<sub>2</sub> sink estimated by the SOCOM ensemble is −1.75 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup> (1992–2009), consistent within uncertainties with estimates from ocean-interior carbon data or atmospheric oxygen trends.http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/7251/2015/bg-12-7251-2015.pdf
spellingShingle C. Rödenbeck
D. C. E. Bakker
N. Gruber
Y. Iida
A. R. Jacobson
S. Jones
P. Landschützer
N. Metzl
S. Nakaoka
A. Olsen
G.-H. Park
P. Peylin
K. B. Rodgers
T. P. Sasse
U. Schuster
J. D. Shutler
V. Valsala
R. Wanninkhof
J. Zeng
Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)
Biogeosciences
title Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)
title_full Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)
title_fullStr Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)
title_full_unstemmed Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)
title_short Data-based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability – first results of the Surface Ocean <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> Mapping intercomparison (SOCOM)
title_sort data based estimates of the ocean carbon sink variability first results of the surface ocean i p i co sub 2 sub mapping intercomparison socom
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/7251/2015/bg-12-7251-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT crodenbeck databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT dcebakker databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT ngruber databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT yiida databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT arjacobson databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT sjones databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT plandschutzer databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT nmetzl databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT snakaoka databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT aolsen databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT ghpark databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT ppeylin databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT kbrodgers databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT tpsasse databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT uschuster databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT jdshutler databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT vvalsala databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT rwanninkhof databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom
AT jzeng databasedestimatesoftheoceancarbonsinkvariabilityfirstresultsofthesurfaceoceanipicosub2submappingintercomparisonsocom