Conversion Strategy in Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Unresectable Liver-Limited Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients frequently develop liver metastases. Different treatment strategies are available according to the timing of appearance, the burden of metastatic disease, and the performance status of the patient. Systemic treatment (ST) represents the cornerstone of metastatic dise...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefano Granieri, Christian Cotsoglou, Alessandro Bonomi, Lisa Salvatore, Roberto Filippi, Olga Nigro, Fabio Gelsomino, Ina Valeria Zurlo, Ilaria Depetris, Riccardo Giampieri, Rossana Berardi, Cristina Morelli, Michele De Tursi, Michela Roberto, Elson Gjoni, Alessandro Germini, Nicola de Angelis, Riccardo Memeo, Antonio Facciorusso, Ornella Garrone, Daryl Ramai, Michele Ghidini, Alessandro Parisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/22/5513
Description
Summary:Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients frequently develop liver metastases. Different treatment strategies are available according to the timing of appearance, the burden of metastatic disease, and the performance status of the patient. Systemic treatment (ST) represents the cornerstone of metastatic disease management. However, in select cases, combined ST and surgical resection can lead to remarkable survival outcomes. In the present multicentric cohort study, we explored the efficacy of a conversion strategy in a selected population of left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type CRC patients with liver-limited metastatic disease. Methods: The primary endpoint was to compare survival outcomes of patients undergoing ST not leading to surgery, liver resection after conversion ST, and hepatic resection with perioperative ST. Furthermore, we explored survival outcomes depending on whether the case was discussed within a multidisciplinary team. Results: Between 2012 and 2020, data from 690 patients respecting the inclusion criteria were collected. Among these, 272 patients were deemed eligible for the analysis. The conversion rate was 24.1% of cases. Fifty-six (20.6%) patients undergoing surgical resection after induction treatment (i.e., ultimately resectable) had a significant survival advantage compared to those receiving systemic treatment not leading to surgery (176 pts, 64.7%) (5-year OS 60.8% and 11.7%, respectively, Log Rank test <i>p</i> < 0.001; HR = 0.273; 95% CI: 0.16–0.46; <i>p</i> < 0.001; 5-year PFS 22.2% and 6.3%, respectively, Log Rank test <i>p</i> < 0.001; HR = 0.447; 95% CI: 0.32–0.63; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no difference in survival between ultimately resectable patients and those who had liver resection with perioperative systemic treatment (potentially resectable—40 pts) (5-year OS 71.1%, Log Rank test <i>p</i> = 0.311. HR = 0.671; 95% CI: 0.31–1.46; <i>p</i> = 0.314; 5-year PFS 25.7%, Log Rank test <i>p</i> = 0.305. HR = 0.782; 95% CI: 0.49–1.25; <i>p</i> = 0.306). Conclusions: In our selected population of left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer patients with liver-limited disease, a conversion strategy was confirmed to provide a survival benefit. Patients not deemed surgical candidates at the time of diagnosis and patients judged resectable with perioperative systemic treatment have similar survival outcomes.
ISSN:2072-6694