Hegel’s Bellicis View of War. Initial State and Early Works

For over a century, Hegel’s view of war is seen as controversial that results in mutually exclusive interpretations. To reach a proper evaluation of Hegel’s views, it is necessary to consider both Hegel’s initial states of philosophical doctrine about war and peace, and the development of his unders...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexei N. Krouglov
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2022-09-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/viewFile/32112/21164
_version_ 1811205892597612544
author Alexei N. Krouglov
author_facet Alexei N. Krouglov
author_sort Alexei N. Krouglov
collection DOAJ
description For over a century, Hegel’s view of war is seen as controversial that results in mutually exclusive interpretations. To reach a proper evaluation of Hegel’s views, it is necessary to consider both Hegel’s initial states of philosophical doctrine about war and peace, and the development of his understanding of war from early works to mature ones. In the first part of the paper, I characterize Kant’s position on war, since it was the starting point for Hegel. Contrary to popular representations about Kant as an exclusive pacifist, the philosopher of Koenigsberg had a philosophical-historical treatment of war, in which the war appeared as something sublime. However, both legal-ethical peace understanding and veto of war from the point of practical reason were not dominant in Kant’s philosophy, subordinating the sublime treatment of war. Kant’s next contemporaries could not already keep this position, emphasizing either one or the other side of war interpretation. Starting from the early writings (the paper “On the Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law” or manuscripts “System of Ethical Life” and “The German Constitution”), Hegel stresses an ethical aspect of war and its necessity, so that the shield is arranged on the way of systems isolation and individuals atomization, and the unity in its ethical health is saved. Perpetual peace, on the contrary, leads to diseases. The statement about equality of claims and the same truthfulness of warring parties’ rights is the originality of Hegel’s view. It makes absolutely impossible the war evaluation from the point of its justice and injustice.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T03:39:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e260437b0d24d2f823343af76408a8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2313-2302
2408-8900
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-12T03:39:04Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
record_format Article
series RUDN Journal of Philosophy
spelling doaj.art-7e260437b0d24d2f823343af76408a8d2022-12-22T03:49:20ZdeuPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Philosophy2313-23022408-89002022-09-0126364465710.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-3-644-65720798Hegel’s Bellicis View of War. Initial State and Early WorksAlexei N. Krouglov0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1152-1309Russian State University for the HumanitiesFor over a century, Hegel’s view of war is seen as controversial that results in mutually exclusive interpretations. To reach a proper evaluation of Hegel’s views, it is necessary to consider both Hegel’s initial states of philosophical doctrine about war and peace, and the development of his understanding of war from early works to mature ones. In the first part of the paper, I characterize Kant’s position on war, since it was the starting point for Hegel. Contrary to popular representations about Kant as an exclusive pacifist, the philosopher of Koenigsberg had a philosophical-historical treatment of war, in which the war appeared as something sublime. However, both legal-ethical peace understanding and veto of war from the point of practical reason were not dominant in Kant’s philosophy, subordinating the sublime treatment of war. Kant’s next contemporaries could not already keep this position, emphasizing either one or the other side of war interpretation. Starting from the early writings (the paper “On the Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law” or manuscripts “System of Ethical Life” and “The German Constitution”), Hegel stresses an ethical aspect of war and its necessity, so that the shield is arranged on the way of systems isolation and individuals atomization, and the unity in its ethical health is saved. Perpetual peace, on the contrary, leads to diseases. The statement about equality of claims and the same truthfulness of warring parties’ rights is the originality of Hegel’s view. It makes absolutely impossible the war evaluation from the point of its justice and injustice.https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/viewFile/32112/21164warperpetual peaceethical liferecognitionkanthegel
spellingShingle Alexei N. Krouglov
Hegel’s Bellicis View of War. Initial State and Early Works
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
war
perpetual peace
ethical life
recognition
kant
hegel
title Hegel’s Bellicis View of War. Initial State and Early Works
title_full Hegel’s Bellicis View of War. Initial State and Early Works
title_fullStr Hegel’s Bellicis View of War. Initial State and Early Works
title_full_unstemmed Hegel’s Bellicis View of War. Initial State and Early Works
title_short Hegel’s Bellicis View of War. Initial State and Early Works
title_sort hegel s bellicis view of war initial state and early works
topic war
perpetual peace
ethical life
recognition
kant
hegel
url https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/viewFile/32112/21164
work_keys_str_mv AT alexeinkrouglov hegelsbellicisviewofwarinitialstateandearlyworks