Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?

Purpose: To assess the assumption that differences exist between the traditional and publication-based PhD routes in terms of the thesis’ length and the scientific publications originating from it. Method: A retrospective comparative study on medical PhD theses offered by an online repository was pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean, Sorana D. Bolboacă, Andrei Achimaş-Cadariu, Tudor Cătălin Drugan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-06-01
Series:Publications
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/4/2/14
_version_ 1798040205940228096
author Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean
Sorana D. Bolboacă
Andrei Achimaş-Cadariu
Tudor Cătălin Drugan
author_facet Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean
Sorana D. Bolboacă
Andrei Achimaş-Cadariu
Tudor Cătălin Drugan
author_sort Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To assess the assumption that differences exist between the traditional and publication-based PhD routes in terms of the thesis’ length and the scientific publications originating from it. Method: A retrospective comparative study on medical PhD theses offered by an online repository was performed. All free full-text medical PhD theses defended at United Kingdom institutions between 2003 and 2015 were analyzed and assigned to the traditional (TT) or publication based thesis (PBT) group. Several characteristics of theses and thesis-related articles were collected and analyzed. The thesis-related articles were investigated regarding quantity and visibility (citations, impact factor, and journal rank). Results: The theses length proved similar in PBT and TT group. PBT group included significantly more studies than TT group (mean 4.44 vs. 2.67) also reflected in significantly more thesis-related articles. The percentage of articles listed in Web of Science and published in a journal with impact factor proved significantly lower in TT compared with PBT group. On the contrary, article citations were significantly higher for TT. Both groups published similarly in high-ranked journals (Q1 or Q2). Conclusion: The research productivity originating from the PBT group was, as expected, significantly larger but not significantly more visible than those from TT group.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:04:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e27aa247d2944799885d52db1f1d159
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-6775
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:04:15Z
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Publications
spelling doaj.art-7e27aa247d2944799885d52db1f1d1592022-12-22T04:00:46ZengMDPI AGPublications2304-67752016-06-01421410.3390/publications4020014publications4020014Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean0Sorana D. Bolboacă1Andrei Achimaş-Cadariu2Tudor Cătălin Drugan3Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Haţieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400012, RomaniaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Haţieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400012, RomaniaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Haţieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400012, RomaniaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Haţieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400012, RomaniaPurpose: To assess the assumption that differences exist between the traditional and publication-based PhD routes in terms of the thesis’ length and the scientific publications originating from it. Method: A retrospective comparative study on medical PhD theses offered by an online repository was performed. All free full-text medical PhD theses defended at United Kingdom institutions between 2003 and 2015 were analyzed and assigned to the traditional (TT) or publication based thesis (PBT) group. Several characteristics of theses and thesis-related articles were collected and analyzed. The thesis-related articles were investigated regarding quantity and visibility (citations, impact factor, and journal rank). Results: The theses length proved similar in PBT and TT group. PBT group included significantly more studies than TT group (mean 4.44 vs. 2.67) also reflected in significantly more thesis-related articles. The percentage of articles listed in Web of Science and published in a journal with impact factor proved significantly lower in TT compared with PBT group. On the contrary, article citations were significantly higher for TT. Both groups published similarly in high-ranked journals (Q1 or Q2). Conclusion: The research productivity originating from the PBT group was, as expected, significantly larger but not significantly more visible than those from TT group.http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/4/2/14knowledge productiondoctoral productivitypublication-based PhDtraditional PhDthesismedicine
spellingShingle Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean
Sorana D. Bolboacă
Andrei Achimaş-Cadariu
Tudor Cătălin Drugan
Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?
Publications
knowledge production
doctoral productivity
publication-based PhD
traditional PhD
thesis
medicine
title Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?
title_full Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?
title_fullStr Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?
title_short Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?
title_sort knowledge production in two types of medical phd routes what s to gain
topic knowledge production
doctoral productivity
publication-based PhD
traditional PhD
thesis
medicine
url http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/4/2/14
work_keys_str_mv AT andradaelenaurdacimpean knowledgeproductionintwotypesofmedicalphdrouteswhatstogain
AT soranadbolboaca knowledgeproductionintwotypesofmedicalphdrouteswhatstogain
AT andreiachimascadariu knowledgeproductionintwotypesofmedicalphdrouteswhatstogain
AT tudorcatalindrugan knowledgeproductionintwotypesofmedicalphdrouteswhatstogain