Analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e-cigarette use and the cause of the EVALI outbreak

Abstract Introduction In August 2019, an outbreak of “e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury” (EVALI) prompted many states and health organizations to warn against the use of electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, due to the presumed link between e-cigarette use and the illness. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Katchmar, Paul Shafer, Michael Siegel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-10-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00694-6
_version_ 1811226683586379776
author Amanda Katchmar
Paul Shafer
Michael Siegel
author_facet Amanda Katchmar
Paul Shafer
Michael Siegel
author_sort Amanda Katchmar
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction In August 2019, an outbreak of “e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury” (EVALI) prompted many states and health organizations to warn against the use of electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, due to the presumed link between e-cigarette use and the illness. However, it was later shown that vitamin E acetate, a component of some illicit vaporizable THC products, was the causative agent in this outbreak. Methods We conducted a series of cross-sectional surveys of the websites of all state departments of health to determine how they communicated the risk of e-cigarette use during and after the EVALI outbreak. We then paired this analysis with data from the 2016 through 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to measure changes in cigarette and e-cigarette use. Results Website data from 24 states was available for analysis at all three time points of interest, and BRFSS data was only available for 8 of these states. We found that by January 2020, a majority of the states surveyed did not list vaporizable THC use as a cause of EVALI; however, differences in state messaging did not appear to be associated with changes in e-cigarette and cigarette use. Conclusions Given the number of states that did not appear to update their messaging regarding the cause of EVALI, we believe that states should re-evaluate this messaging to accurately communicate the risks of e-cigarette use.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:29:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e36ff220413409f984d8d734af3b579
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7517
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:29:22Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Harm Reduction Journal
spelling doaj.art-7e36ff220413409f984d8d734af3b5792022-12-22T03:38:24ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172022-10-011911810.1186/s12954-022-00694-6Analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e-cigarette use and the cause of the EVALI outbreakAmanda Katchmar0Paul Shafer1Michael Siegel2Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public HealthDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public HealthDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of MedicineAbstract Introduction In August 2019, an outbreak of “e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury” (EVALI) prompted many states and health organizations to warn against the use of electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, due to the presumed link between e-cigarette use and the illness. However, it was later shown that vitamin E acetate, a component of some illicit vaporizable THC products, was the causative agent in this outbreak. Methods We conducted a series of cross-sectional surveys of the websites of all state departments of health to determine how they communicated the risk of e-cigarette use during and after the EVALI outbreak. We then paired this analysis with data from the 2016 through 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to measure changes in cigarette and e-cigarette use. Results Website data from 24 states was available for analysis at all three time points of interest, and BRFSS data was only available for 8 of these states. We found that by January 2020, a majority of the states surveyed did not list vaporizable THC use as a cause of EVALI; however, differences in state messaging did not appear to be associated with changes in e-cigarette and cigarette use. Conclusions Given the number of states that did not appear to update their messaging regarding the cause of EVALI, we believe that states should re-evaluate this messaging to accurately communicate the risks of e-cigarette use.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00694-6E-cigarette useEVALICigarette useMessagingState departments of public health
spellingShingle Amanda Katchmar
Paul Shafer
Michael Siegel
Analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e-cigarette use and the cause of the EVALI outbreak
Harm Reduction Journal
E-cigarette use
EVALI
Cigarette use
Messaging
State departments of public health
title Analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e-cigarette use and the cause of the EVALI outbreak
title_full Analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e-cigarette use and the cause of the EVALI outbreak
title_fullStr Analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e-cigarette use and the cause of the EVALI outbreak
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e-cigarette use and the cause of the EVALI outbreak
title_short Analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e-cigarette use and the cause of the EVALI outbreak
title_sort analysis of state portrayals of the risks of e cigarette use and the cause of the evali outbreak
topic E-cigarette use
EVALI
Cigarette use
Messaging
State departments of public health
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00694-6
work_keys_str_mv AT amandakatchmar analysisofstateportrayalsoftherisksofecigaretteuseandthecauseoftheevalioutbreak
AT paulshafer analysisofstateportrayalsoftherisksofecigaretteuseandthecauseoftheevalioutbreak
AT michaelsiegel analysisofstateportrayalsoftherisksofecigaretteuseandthecauseoftheevalioutbreak