Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter?
Krupka and Weber (2013) introduce an incentive-compatible coordination game as an alternative method for elicitation of normative judgments. I show, however, that people provide virtually the same responses in incentivized and non-incentivized versions of the Krupka-Weber game. Besides ratings of so...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500003958/type/journal_article |
| _version_ | 1797701129141747712 |
|---|---|
| author | Štěpán Veselý |
| author_facet | Štěpán Veselý |
| author_sort | Štěpán Veselý |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Krupka and Weber (2013) introduce an incentive-compatible coordination game as an alternative method for elicitation of normative judgments. I show, however, that people provide virtually the same responses in incentivized and non-incentivized versions of the Krupka-Weber game. Besides ratings of social appropriateness, I also elicit ratings of fairness of all possible offers in an ultimatum game. Ratings of social appropriateness and fairness are similar for low offers (below or equal to the equal split), but not for high offers which are judged to be more appropriate than fair. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T04:30:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7e47b04f976a43748a68bea2b0b66d50 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1930-2975 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T04:30:50Z |
| publishDate | 2015-03-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Judgment and Decision Making |
| spelling | doaj.art-7e47b04f976a43748a68bea2b0b66d502023-09-03T10:05:03ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752015-03-011019119710.1017/S1930297500003958Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter?Štěpán Veselý0Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Arne Novaka 1, Brno, 602 00, Czech Republic Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk UniversityKrupka and Weber (2013) introduce an incentive-compatible coordination game as an alternative method for elicitation of normative judgments. I show, however, that people provide virtually the same responses in incentivized and non-incentivized versions of the Krupka-Weber game. Besides ratings of social appropriateness, I also elicit ratings of fairness of all possible offers in an ultimatum game. Ratings of social appropriateness and fairness are similar for low offers (below or equal to the equal split), but not for high offers which are judged to be more appropriate than fair.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500003958/type/journal_articleappropriatenessfairnesssocial normsincentivesratingultimatum game |
| spellingShingle | Štěpán Veselý Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? Judgment and Decision Making appropriateness fairness social norms incentives rating ultimatum game |
| title | Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_full | Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_fullStr | Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_short | Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_sort | elicitation of normative and fairness judgments do incentives matter |
| topic | appropriateness fairness social norms incentives rating ultimatum game |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500003958/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stepanvesely elicitationofnormativeandfairnessjudgmentsdoincentivesmatter |