Protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care: A scoping review.
Technology is transforming service delivery in many health professions, particularly with the rapid shift to virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health profession regulators must navigate legal and ethical complexities to facilitate virtual care while upholding their mandate to protect the pu...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | PLOS Digital Health |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000163 |
| _version_ | 1797696482812362752 |
|---|---|
| author | Kathleen Leslie Sophia Myles Catharine J Schiller Abeer A Alraja Sioban Nelson Tracey L Adams |
| author_facet | Kathleen Leslie Sophia Myles Catharine J Schiller Abeer A Alraja Sioban Nelson Tracey L Adams |
| author_sort | Kathleen Leslie |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Technology is transforming service delivery in many health professions, particularly with the rapid shift to virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health profession regulators must navigate legal and ethical complexities to facilitate virtual care while upholding their mandate to protect the public interest. The objectives of this scoping review were to examine how the public interest is protected when regulating health professionals who provide virtual care, discuss policy and practice implications of virtual care, and make recommendations for future research. We searched six multidisciplinary databases for academic literature published in English between January 2015 and May 2021. We also searched specific databases and websites for relevant grey literature. After screening, 59 academic articles and 18 grey literature sources were included for analysis. We identified five key findings: the public interest when regulating health professionals providing virtual care was only implicitly considered in most of the literature; when the public interest was discussed, the dimension of access was emphasized; criticism in the literature focused on social ideologies driving regulation that may inhibit more widespread use of virtual care; subnational licensure was viewed as a barrier; and the demand for virtual care during COVID-19 catalyzed licensure and scope of practice changes. Overall, virtual care introduces new areas of risk, potential harm, and inequity that health profession regulators need to address as technology continues to evolve. Regulators have an essential role in providing clear standards and guidelines around virtual care, including what is required for competent practice. There are indications that the public interest concept is evolving in relation to virtual care as regulators continue to balance public safety, equitable access to services, and economic competitiveness. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T03:27:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7e559a14293a4853993fcd578a3247b6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2767-3170 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T03:27:03Z |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLOS Digital Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-7e559a14293a4853993fcd578a3247b62023-09-03T13:31:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLOS Digital Health2767-31702023-04-0124e000016310.1371/journal.pdig.0000163Protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care: A scoping review.Kathleen LeslieSophia MylesCatharine J SchillerAbeer A AlrajaSioban NelsonTracey L AdamsTechnology is transforming service delivery in many health professions, particularly with the rapid shift to virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health profession regulators must navigate legal and ethical complexities to facilitate virtual care while upholding their mandate to protect the public interest. The objectives of this scoping review were to examine how the public interest is protected when regulating health professionals who provide virtual care, discuss policy and practice implications of virtual care, and make recommendations for future research. We searched six multidisciplinary databases for academic literature published in English between January 2015 and May 2021. We also searched specific databases and websites for relevant grey literature. After screening, 59 academic articles and 18 grey literature sources were included for analysis. We identified five key findings: the public interest when regulating health professionals providing virtual care was only implicitly considered in most of the literature; when the public interest was discussed, the dimension of access was emphasized; criticism in the literature focused on social ideologies driving regulation that may inhibit more widespread use of virtual care; subnational licensure was viewed as a barrier; and the demand for virtual care during COVID-19 catalyzed licensure and scope of practice changes. Overall, virtual care introduces new areas of risk, potential harm, and inequity that health profession regulators need to address as technology continues to evolve. Regulators have an essential role in providing clear standards and guidelines around virtual care, including what is required for competent practice. There are indications that the public interest concept is evolving in relation to virtual care as regulators continue to balance public safety, equitable access to services, and economic competitiveness.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000163 |
| spellingShingle | Kathleen Leslie Sophia Myles Catharine J Schiller Abeer A Alraja Sioban Nelson Tracey L Adams Protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care: A scoping review. PLOS Digital Health |
| title | Protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care: A scoping review. |
| title_full | Protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care: A scoping review. |
| title_fullStr | Protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care: A scoping review. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care: A scoping review. |
| title_short | Protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care: A scoping review. |
| title_sort | protecting the public interest while regulating health professionals providing virtual care a scoping review |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000163 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kathleenleslie protectingthepublicinterestwhileregulatinghealthprofessionalsprovidingvirtualcareascopingreview AT sophiamyles protectingthepublicinterestwhileregulatinghealthprofessionalsprovidingvirtualcareascopingreview AT catharinejschiller protectingthepublicinterestwhileregulatinghealthprofessionalsprovidingvirtualcareascopingreview AT abeeraalraja protectingthepublicinterestwhileregulatinghealthprofessionalsprovidingvirtualcareascopingreview AT siobannelson protectingthepublicinterestwhileregulatinghealthprofessionalsprovidingvirtualcareascopingreview AT traceyladams protectingthepublicinterestwhileregulatinghealthprofessionalsprovidingvirtualcareascopingreview |