Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.

Most studies showing a volume outcome effect in resection surgery for oesophago-gastric cancer were conducted before the centralisation of clinical services. This study evaluated the relation between hospital- and surgeon volume and different risk-adjusted outcomes after oesophago-gastric (OG) cance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudia Fischer, Hester Lingsma, Niek Klazinga, Richard Hardwick, David Cromwell, Ewout Steyerberg, Oliver Groene
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5658198?pdf=render
_version_ 1818893386004824064
author Claudia Fischer
Hester Lingsma
Niek Klazinga
Richard Hardwick
David Cromwell
Ewout Steyerberg
Oliver Groene
author_facet Claudia Fischer
Hester Lingsma
Niek Klazinga
Richard Hardwick
David Cromwell
Ewout Steyerberg
Oliver Groene
author_sort Claudia Fischer
collection DOAJ
description Most studies showing a volume outcome effect in resection surgery for oesophago-gastric cancer were conducted before the centralisation of clinical services. This study evaluated the relation between hospital- and surgeon volume and different risk-adjusted outcomes after oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer surgery in England between 2011 and 2013.In data from the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit from the UK, multivariable random-effects logistic regression models were used to quantify the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on three outcomes: 30-day and 90-day mortality and anastomotic leakage. The models included patient risk factors to adjust for differences in case-mix among hospitals and surgeons. The between-cluster heterogeneity was estimated with the median odds ratio (MOR).The study included patients treated at 42 hospitals and 329 surgeons. The median (interquartile range) of the annual hospital and surgeon volumes were 110 patients (82 to 137) and 13 patients (8 to 19), respectively. The overall rates for 30-day and 90-day mortality were 2.3% and 4.4% respectively, and the anastomotic leakage was 6.3%. Higher hospital volume was associated with lower 30-day mortality (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.98) and lower anastomotic leakage rates (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98) but not 90-day mortality. Higher surgeon volume was only associated with lower anastomotic leakage rates (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72-0.92). Hospital volume explained a part of the between-hospital variation in 30-day mortality whereas surgeon volume explained part of the between-hospital variation in anastomotic leakage.In the setting of centralized O-G cancer surgery in England, we could still observe an effect of volume on short-term outcomes. However, the effect is inconsistent, depending on the type of outcome measure under consideration, and much smaller than in previous studies. Efforts to centralise O-G cancer services further should carefully address the effects of both hospital and surgeon volume on the range of outcome measures that are relevant to patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T18:11:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e5faf0bea7e46f3b63a365b52b6fce9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T18:11:46Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-7e5faf0bea7e46f3b63a365b52b6fce92022-12-21T20:11:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011210e018395510.1371/journal.pone.0183955Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.Claudia FischerHester LingsmaNiek KlazingaRichard HardwickDavid CromwellEwout SteyerbergOliver GroeneMost studies showing a volume outcome effect in resection surgery for oesophago-gastric cancer were conducted before the centralisation of clinical services. This study evaluated the relation between hospital- and surgeon volume and different risk-adjusted outcomes after oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer surgery in England between 2011 and 2013.In data from the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit from the UK, multivariable random-effects logistic regression models were used to quantify the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on three outcomes: 30-day and 90-day mortality and anastomotic leakage. The models included patient risk factors to adjust for differences in case-mix among hospitals and surgeons. The between-cluster heterogeneity was estimated with the median odds ratio (MOR).The study included patients treated at 42 hospitals and 329 surgeons. The median (interquartile range) of the annual hospital and surgeon volumes were 110 patients (82 to 137) and 13 patients (8 to 19), respectively. The overall rates for 30-day and 90-day mortality were 2.3% and 4.4% respectively, and the anastomotic leakage was 6.3%. Higher hospital volume was associated with lower 30-day mortality (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.98) and lower anastomotic leakage rates (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98) but not 90-day mortality. Higher surgeon volume was only associated with lower anastomotic leakage rates (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72-0.92). Hospital volume explained a part of the between-hospital variation in 30-day mortality whereas surgeon volume explained part of the between-hospital variation in anastomotic leakage.In the setting of centralized O-G cancer surgery in England, we could still observe an effect of volume on short-term outcomes. However, the effect is inconsistent, depending on the type of outcome measure under consideration, and much smaller than in previous studies. Efforts to centralise O-G cancer services further should carefully address the effects of both hospital and surgeon volume on the range of outcome measures that are relevant to patients.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5658198?pdf=render
spellingShingle Claudia Fischer
Hester Lingsma
Niek Klazinga
Richard Hardwick
David Cromwell
Ewout Steyerberg
Oliver Groene
Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.
PLoS ONE
title Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.
title_full Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.
title_fullStr Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.
title_full_unstemmed Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.
title_short Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.
title_sort volume outcome revisited the effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago gastric cancer surgery
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5658198?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiafischer volumeoutcomerevisitedtheeffectofhospitalandsurgeonvolumesonmultipleoutcomemeasuresinoesophagogastriccancersurgery
AT hesterlingsma volumeoutcomerevisitedtheeffectofhospitalandsurgeonvolumesonmultipleoutcomemeasuresinoesophagogastriccancersurgery
AT niekklazinga volumeoutcomerevisitedtheeffectofhospitalandsurgeonvolumesonmultipleoutcomemeasuresinoesophagogastriccancersurgery
AT richardhardwick volumeoutcomerevisitedtheeffectofhospitalandsurgeonvolumesonmultipleoutcomemeasuresinoesophagogastriccancersurgery
AT davidcromwell volumeoutcomerevisitedtheeffectofhospitalandsurgeonvolumesonmultipleoutcomemeasuresinoesophagogastriccancersurgery
AT ewoutsteyerberg volumeoutcomerevisitedtheeffectofhospitalandsurgeonvolumesonmultipleoutcomemeasuresinoesophagogastriccancersurgery
AT olivergroene volumeoutcomerevisitedtheeffectofhospitalandsurgeonvolumesonmultipleoutcomemeasuresinoesophagogastriccancersurgery