Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological results

ABSTRACTObjectives:To evaluate the differences of peri-operatory and oncological outcomes between Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy and Open Radical Cystectomy in our center.Materials and Methods:Overall, 50 patients were included in this non randomized match-pair analysis: 25 patients who had undergo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcos Tobias-Machado, Danniel Frade Said, Anuar Ibrahim Mitre, Alexandre Pompeo, Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015-08-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000400635&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1819116910305869824
author Marcos Tobias-Machado
Danniel Frade Said
Anuar Ibrahim Mitre
Alexandre Pompeo
Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo
author_facet Marcos Tobias-Machado
Danniel Frade Said
Anuar Ibrahim Mitre
Alexandre Pompeo
Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo
author_sort Marcos Tobias-Machado
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTObjectives:To evaluate the differences of peri-operatory and oncological outcomes between Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy and Open Radical Cystectomy in our center.Materials and Methods:Overall, 50 patients were included in this non randomized match-pair analysis: 25 patients who had undergone Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer (Group-1) and 25 patients with similar characteristics who had undergone Open Radical Cystectomy (Group-2). The patients were operated from January 2005 to December 2012 in a single Institution.Results:Mean operative time for groups 1 and 2 were 350 and 280 minutes (p=0.03) respectively. Mean blood loss was 330 mL for group 1 and 580 mL for group 2 (p=0.04). Intraoperative transfusion rate was 0% and 36% for groups 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.005). Perioperative complication rate was similar between groups. Mean time to oral intake was 2 days for group 1 and 3 days for group 2 (p=0.08). Median hospital stay was 7 days for group 1 and 13 for group 2 (p=0.04). There were no differences in positive surgical margins and overall survival, between groups.Conclusions:In a reference center with pelvic laparoscopic expertise, Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy may be considered a safe procedure with similar complication rate of Open Radical Cystectomy. Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy is more time consuming, with reduced bleeding and transfusion rate. Hospital stay seems to be shorter. Oncologically no difference was observed in our mid-term follow-up.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T05:24:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e6207de87a04f668a7850ede077f84a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-6119
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T05:24:35Z
publishDate 2015-08-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format Article
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-7e6207de87a04f668a7850ede077f84a2022-12-21T18:37:37ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61192015-08-0141463564110.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0168S1677-55382015000400635Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological resultsMarcos Tobias-MachadoDanniel Frade SaidAnuar Ibrahim MitreAlexandre PompeoAntonio Carlos Lima PompeoABSTRACTObjectives:To evaluate the differences of peri-operatory and oncological outcomes between Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy and Open Radical Cystectomy in our center.Materials and Methods:Overall, 50 patients were included in this non randomized match-pair analysis: 25 patients who had undergone Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer (Group-1) and 25 patients with similar characteristics who had undergone Open Radical Cystectomy (Group-2). The patients were operated from January 2005 to December 2012 in a single Institution.Results:Mean operative time for groups 1 and 2 were 350 and 280 minutes (p=0.03) respectively. Mean blood loss was 330 mL for group 1 and 580 mL for group 2 (p=0.04). Intraoperative transfusion rate was 0% and 36% for groups 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.005). Perioperative complication rate was similar between groups. Mean time to oral intake was 2 days for group 1 and 3 days for group 2 (p=0.08). Median hospital stay was 7 days for group 1 and 13 for group 2 (p=0.04). There were no differences in positive surgical margins and overall survival, between groups.Conclusions:In a reference center with pelvic laparoscopic expertise, Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy may be considered a safe procedure with similar complication rate of Open Radical Cystectomy. Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy is more time consuming, with reduced bleeding and transfusion rate. Hospital stay seems to be shorter. Oncologically no difference was observed in our mid-term follow-up.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000400635&lng=en&tlng=enUrinary BladderCystectomyLaparoscopyUrinary Bladder Neoplasms
spellingShingle Marcos Tobias-Machado
Danniel Frade Said
Anuar Ibrahim Mitre
Alexandre Pompeo
Antonio Carlos Lima Pompeo
Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological results
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Urinary Bladder
Cystectomy
Laparoscopy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
title Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological results
title_full Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological results
title_fullStr Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological results
title_full_unstemmed Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological results
title_short Comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center: perioperative and oncological results
title_sort comparison beetwen open and laparoscopic radical cistectomy in a latin american reference center perioperative and oncological results
topic Urinary Bladder
Cystectomy
Laparoscopy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000400635&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marcostobiasmachado comparisonbeetwenopenandlaparoscopicradicalcistectomyinalatinamericanreferencecenterperioperativeandoncologicalresults
AT dannielfradesaid comparisonbeetwenopenandlaparoscopicradicalcistectomyinalatinamericanreferencecenterperioperativeandoncologicalresults
AT anuaribrahimmitre comparisonbeetwenopenandlaparoscopicradicalcistectomyinalatinamericanreferencecenterperioperativeandoncologicalresults
AT alexandrepompeo comparisonbeetwenopenandlaparoscopicradicalcistectomyinalatinamericanreferencecenterperioperativeandoncologicalresults
AT antoniocarloslimapompeo comparisonbeetwenopenandlaparoscopicradicalcistectomyinalatinamericanreferencecenterperioperativeandoncologicalresults