The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Necessarianism; Describing and Analyzing two Contemporary Approaches
In contemporary analytic philosophy, the principle of sufficient reason (PSR) has been attacked due to its controversial results. Among these results, necessarianism (modal collapse) is the most significant one. Indeed, our intuition indicates that there are some things around us which are contingen...
Main Authors: | Roozbeh Zare, Seyyed Hassan Hosseini |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Qom
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_1393_caf4cb997c848a6b5644fa4151af0fd1.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Ultimate Explanation and Necessary Being: Describing and Analyzing Timothy O'Connor’s View Point
by: Roozbeh Zare, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Van Inwagen's Modal Skepticism and The Scope of Modal knowledge
by: Masoud Zia Ali Nasab Pour
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Van Inwagen, Divine Guidedness, and
the Meaning of “Chance”
by: Mohammad Ebrahim Maghsoudi, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Localizing Violations of the Principle of Sufficient Reason—Leibniz on the Modal Status of the PSR
by: Sebastian Bender
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Localizing Violations of the Principle of Sufficient Reason—Leibniz on the Modal Status of the PSR
by: Sebastian Bender
Published: (2022-10-01)