Optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine: Insights from exegetic analysis

Abstract With climate change concerns on the rise, finding efficient and sustainable ways to separate carbon dioxide from industrial gas mixtures has become increasingly important. Membrane‐based gas separation technologies offer a promising solution due to their low energy consumption, low emission...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Majnoon, Seyed Farhan Moosavian, Ahmad Hajinezhad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:Energy Science & Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1612
_version_ 1827584542556291072
author Ali Majnoon
Seyed Farhan Moosavian
Ahmad Hajinezhad
author_facet Ali Majnoon
Seyed Farhan Moosavian
Ahmad Hajinezhad
author_sort Ali Majnoon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract With climate change concerns on the rise, finding efficient and sustainable ways to separate carbon dioxide from industrial gas mixtures has become increasingly important. Membrane‐based gas separation technologies offer a promising solution due to their low energy consumption, low emissions, and ease of operation. In this study, we dug deep into theoretical energy consumption and practical optimization strategies for CO2 separation using such technologies. Our results showed that CO2 separation can be achieved with relatively low specific energy consumption, ranging from 0.09 to 0.27 MJe/kg CO2, depending on feed CO2 concentration. By conducting process simulations, we determined the optimal feed gas pressure and membrane surface area required to achieve a CO2 absorption ratio of 90% (mol). We also analyzed the effects of CO2 permeation and selectivity on energy consumption and membrane area, revealing that increasing both can significantly reduce energy consumption, albeit with more membrane surface area required. Using seepage flow circulation was found to be a particularly effective way to improve feed CO2 concentration and reduce energy consumption. To optimize and improve the capturing process, we conducted exergy analysis in each of the five stages of optimization, reporting Cooling Utilities (MW), Heating Utilities (MW), and Total Utilities (MW) for each step. Our results showed that in the optimal mode, Total Utilities (MW) were reported as 228.1, highlighting the potential of membrane‐based CO2 separation for carbon capture and storage applications. This study provides valuable insights and practical strategies for achieving efficient and sustainable CO2 separation.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:32:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e69343745764d71890ba2e57ac25309
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-0505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:32:51Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Energy Science & Engineering
spelling doaj.art-7e69343745764d71890ba2e57ac253092023-12-14T10:54:26ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052023-12-0111124755477310.1002/ese3.1612Optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine: Insights from exegetic analysisAli Majnoon0Seyed Farhan Moosavian1Ahmad Hajinezhad2Department of Renewable Energies and Environment, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies University of Tehran Tehran IranDepartment of Renewable Energies and Environment, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies University of Tehran Tehran IranDepartment of Renewable Energies and Environment, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies University of Tehran Tehran IranAbstract With climate change concerns on the rise, finding efficient and sustainable ways to separate carbon dioxide from industrial gas mixtures has become increasingly important. Membrane‐based gas separation technologies offer a promising solution due to their low energy consumption, low emissions, and ease of operation. In this study, we dug deep into theoretical energy consumption and practical optimization strategies for CO2 separation using such technologies. Our results showed that CO2 separation can be achieved with relatively low specific energy consumption, ranging from 0.09 to 0.27 MJe/kg CO2, depending on feed CO2 concentration. By conducting process simulations, we determined the optimal feed gas pressure and membrane surface area required to achieve a CO2 absorption ratio of 90% (mol). We also analyzed the effects of CO2 permeation and selectivity on energy consumption and membrane area, revealing that increasing both can significantly reduce energy consumption, albeit with more membrane surface area required. Using seepage flow circulation was found to be a particularly effective way to improve feed CO2 concentration and reduce energy consumption. To optimize and improve the capturing process, we conducted exergy analysis in each of the five stages of optimization, reporting Cooling Utilities (MW), Heating Utilities (MW), and Total Utilities (MW) for each step. Our results showed that in the optimal mode, Total Utilities (MW) were reported as 228.1, highlighting the potential of membrane‐based CO2 separation for carbon capture and storage applications. This study provides valuable insights and practical strategies for achieving efficient and sustainable CO2 separation.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1612Aspen Pluscarbon capturedirect capturingexegetic analysis
spellingShingle Ali Majnoon
Seyed Farhan Moosavian
Ahmad Hajinezhad
Optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine: Insights from exegetic analysis
Energy Science & Engineering
Aspen Plus
carbon capture
direct capturing
exegetic analysis
title Optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine: Insights from exegetic analysis
title_full Optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine: Insights from exegetic analysis
title_fullStr Optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine: Insights from exegetic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine: Insights from exegetic analysis
title_short Optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine: Insights from exegetic analysis
title_sort optimizing carbon capture efficiency with direct capturing and amine insights from exegetic analysis
topic Aspen Plus
carbon capture
direct capturing
exegetic analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1612
work_keys_str_mv AT alimajnoon optimizingcarboncaptureefficiencywithdirectcapturingandamineinsightsfromexegeticanalysis
AT seyedfarhanmoosavian optimizingcarboncaptureefficiencywithdirectcapturingandamineinsightsfromexegeticanalysis
AT ahmadhajinezhad optimizingcarboncaptureefficiencywithdirectcapturingandamineinsightsfromexegeticanalysis