Evolution of Human-Like Social Grooming Strategies Regarding Richness and Group Size

Human social strategies have evolved as an adaption to behave in complex societies. In such societies, humans intensively tend to cooperate with their closer friends, because they have to distribute their limited resources through cooperation (e.g., time, food, etc.). It also makes the situation dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masanori Takano, Genki Ichinose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2018.00008/full
_version_ 1811314335033589760
author Masanori Takano
Genki Ichinose
author_facet Masanori Takano
Genki Ichinose
author_sort Masanori Takano
collection DOAJ
description Human social strategies have evolved as an adaption to behave in complex societies. In such societies, humans intensively tend to cooperate with their closer friends, because they have to distribute their limited resources through cooperation (e.g., time, food, etc.). It also makes the situation difficult to have uniform social relationships (social grooming) with all friends. Thus, the social relationship strengths often show a much skewed distribution (a power law distribution). Here we aim to show adaptivity of such social grooming strategies in order to explore the evolution of human social intelligence. We use a model in the framework of evolutionary games where the social grooming strategies evolve via building social relationships with cooperators. Simulation results demonstrate four evolutionary trends. One of the trends is similar to the strategy that humans use. We find that these trends depend on three parameters; individuals' richness, group sizes, and the amount of social grooming. The human-like strategy evolves in large poor groups. Moreover, the increase of the amount of social grooming makes the group size larger. Conversely, this implies that the same strategy evolves when the amount of social grooming is properly adjusted even if the group sizes are different. Our results are important in the sense that, between human and non-human primates, the differences of the group size and the amount of social grooming are significant.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:10:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e7ba2f3388d4db6bfefeb00660ebada
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-701X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:10:01Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-7e7ba2f3388d4db6bfefeb00660ebada2022-12-22T02:49:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2018-01-01610.3389/fevo.2018.00008310527Evolution of Human-Like Social Grooming Strategies Regarding Richness and Group SizeMasanori Takano0Genki Ichinose1Akihabara Laboratory, CyberAgent, Inc., Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Mathematical and Systems Engineering, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, JapanHuman social strategies have evolved as an adaption to behave in complex societies. In such societies, humans intensively tend to cooperate with their closer friends, because they have to distribute their limited resources through cooperation (e.g., time, food, etc.). It also makes the situation difficult to have uniform social relationships (social grooming) with all friends. Thus, the social relationship strengths often show a much skewed distribution (a power law distribution). Here we aim to show adaptivity of such social grooming strategies in order to explore the evolution of human social intelligence. We use a model in the framework of evolutionary games where the social grooming strategies evolve via building social relationships with cooperators. Simulation results demonstrate four evolutionary trends. One of the trends is similar to the strategy that humans use. We find that these trends depend on three parameters; individuals' richness, group sizes, and the amount of social grooming. The human-like strategy evolves in large poor groups. Moreover, the increase of the amount of social grooming makes the group size larger. Conversely, this implies that the same strategy evolves when the amount of social grooming is properly adjusted even if the group sizes are different. Our results are important in the sense that, between human and non-human primates, the differences of the group size and the amount of social grooming are significant.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2018.00008/fullsocial groomingevolutionary gamesocial structureYule–Simon processcooperation
spellingShingle Masanori Takano
Genki Ichinose
Evolution of Human-Like Social Grooming Strategies Regarding Richness and Group Size
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
social grooming
evolutionary game
social structure
Yule–Simon process
cooperation
title Evolution of Human-Like Social Grooming Strategies Regarding Richness and Group Size
title_full Evolution of Human-Like Social Grooming Strategies Regarding Richness and Group Size
title_fullStr Evolution of Human-Like Social Grooming Strategies Regarding Richness and Group Size
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of Human-Like Social Grooming Strategies Regarding Richness and Group Size
title_short Evolution of Human-Like Social Grooming Strategies Regarding Richness and Group Size
title_sort evolution of human like social grooming strategies regarding richness and group size
topic social grooming
evolutionary game
social structure
Yule–Simon process
cooperation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2018.00008/full
work_keys_str_mv AT masanoritakano evolutionofhumanlikesocialgroomingstrategiesregardingrichnessandgroupsize
AT genkiichinose evolutionofhumanlikesocialgroomingstrategiesregardingrichnessandgroupsize