| Summary: | Objective: based on the critical assessment of terms and structures related to the methodology of anti-crisis management, to propose a new approach to the concept and structure of the methodology of anti-crisis management and the methodology of anti-crisis management in macroeconomy.Methods: abstract-logical.Results: the article substantiates the topicality of studying the structure of anti-crisis management methodology under the obvious crisis in the Russian macroeconomy and, as a rule, inefficient anti-crisis measures taken by the state during the recent two decades. The research are analyzed, which were devoted to the study of notions related to the anti-crisis management methodology, and their main defects are revealed. The researches concerning the structure of anti-crisis management methodology are summarized. It was found that all these researches are not optimal from the standpoint of methodology structure. Based on the literature analysis, the article proposes the author’s interpretation of the notion of anti-crisis management methodology and the anti-crisis management methodology in macroeconomy. New structures for these two methodologies are proposed. The principles of state anti-crisis management in economy are formulated and proved. The main conditions of implementation of anti-crisis management methodology in Russian are classified and characterized, namely: strongly-, middle- and weakly inertial. All of them are illustrated by case studies.Scientific novelty: a new layout of of the methodology of anti-crisis management and the macroeconomy anti-crisis management methodology structure is formed. The subjects and goals are included into the new methodology; the subjects are selected are allocated as follows: the state and the agents closely related to it, the business community, the foreign agents, the society, and other subjects which possess many common properties with the above mentioned. In addition, all elements of the macroeconomy anti-crisis management methodology structure are specified; their essence is clarified; their key relationships are disclosured.Practical significance: the application of the proposed methodologies in practice will allow better implementation of anti-crisis management in macroeconomy than the application of well-known classical approaches, mainly focused on microeconomy.
|
|---|