Patients’ Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and England

Pitchaya Nualdaisri,1,2 Sarah A Corlett,2,3 Immaculate Akaso,4 Barbra Katusiime,5 Freddy Eric Kitutu,4 Siew Siang Chua,6 Janet Krska2 1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand; 2Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Kent and Greenwich, Chatham Maritime...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nualdaisri P, Corlett SA, Akaso I, Katusiime B, Kitutu FE, Chua SS, Krska J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2024-01-01
Series:Patient Preference and Adherence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/patients-experiences-and-preferences-for-medicine-information-an-inter-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PPA
_version_ 1797348225078788096
author Nualdaisri P
Corlett SA
Akaso I
Katusiime B
Kitutu FE
Chua SS
Krska J
author_facet Nualdaisri P
Corlett SA
Akaso I
Katusiime B
Kitutu FE
Chua SS
Krska J
author_sort Nualdaisri P
collection DOAJ
description Pitchaya Nualdaisri,1,2 Sarah A Corlett,2,3 Immaculate Akaso,4 Barbra Katusiime,5 Freddy Eric Kitutu,4 Siew Siang Chua,6 Janet Krska2 1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand; 2Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Kent and Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent, UK; 3Pharmacy Department, Medway Foundation NHS Trust, Kent, UK; 4Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; 5School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, London, UK; 6School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, MalaysiaCorrespondence: Pitchaya Nualdaisri, Email pitchaya.n@psu.ac.thBackground: Verbal and written medicine information are available to the public but the quality, ease of access, ease of understanding and use of these resources varies greatly between countries. Timely access to quality medicine information is essential to support patient safety.Objective: This international cross-sectional survey, conducted in low-to high-income countries, aimed to compare experiences of and preferences for medicine information sources among respondents with recent medicine use.Methods: The survey was originally developed in England (Kent), then adapted and translated for use in southern Thailand (Songkhla), Malaysia (Klang Valley), and central Uganda (Kampala). Data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests.Results: A total 1588 respondents were involved in the study. Community pharmacies were the primary source of medicines in all four countries (40.7 to 65.3%). Most respondents (1460; 92%) had received at least one form of information with their medicine, but provision of written medicine information (WMI) varied between countries. A manufacturer’s leaflet was the most frequent information source for patients in England, while verbal information was common in Thailand, Malaysia and Uganda. There was commonality across countries in the desire for verbal information with or without WMI (1330; 84.8%); aspects of medicine information wanted most frequently were instructions on medicine use (98.3%), indication (98.2%), name (94.4%) and possible side effects (94.3%); and the importance of providing leaflets with all medicines (87.5%). Fewer than 10% in Uganda would use internet based WMI, compared to between 20% and 55% elsewhere.Conclusion: Preferences for medicine information are similar across countries: verbal information is seen as most desirable, and the most wanted aspects of information are common internationally. Accessibility and understandability are key influences on preferred information sources. In-country regulations and practices should ensure that all medicine users can access the information necessary to maximise safe medicine use.Keywords: medicine information sources, patient information leaflets, patient preference, cross-country comparison, international survey
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:01:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e867f52fad343bda4b881fdd038c1ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-889X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T12:01:39Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Patient Preference and Adherence
spelling doaj.art-7e867f52fad343bda4b881fdd038c1ce2024-01-23T18:27:27ZengDove Medical PressPatient Preference and Adherence1177-889X2024-01-01Volume 1823924889919Patients’ Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and EnglandNualdaisri PCorlett SAAkaso IKatusiime BKitutu FEChua SSKrska JPitchaya Nualdaisri,1,2 Sarah A Corlett,2,3 Immaculate Akaso,4 Barbra Katusiime,5 Freddy Eric Kitutu,4 Siew Siang Chua,6 Janet Krska2 1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand; 2Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Kent and Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent, UK; 3Pharmacy Department, Medway Foundation NHS Trust, Kent, UK; 4Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; 5School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, Kingston University, London, UK; 6School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, MalaysiaCorrespondence: Pitchaya Nualdaisri, Email pitchaya.n@psu.ac.thBackground: Verbal and written medicine information are available to the public but the quality, ease of access, ease of understanding and use of these resources varies greatly between countries. Timely access to quality medicine information is essential to support patient safety.Objective: This international cross-sectional survey, conducted in low-to high-income countries, aimed to compare experiences of and preferences for medicine information sources among respondents with recent medicine use.Methods: The survey was originally developed in England (Kent), then adapted and translated for use in southern Thailand (Songkhla), Malaysia (Klang Valley), and central Uganda (Kampala). Data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests.Results: A total 1588 respondents were involved in the study. Community pharmacies were the primary source of medicines in all four countries (40.7 to 65.3%). Most respondents (1460; 92%) had received at least one form of information with their medicine, but provision of written medicine information (WMI) varied between countries. A manufacturer’s leaflet was the most frequent information source for patients in England, while verbal information was common in Thailand, Malaysia and Uganda. There was commonality across countries in the desire for verbal information with or without WMI (1330; 84.8%); aspects of medicine information wanted most frequently were instructions on medicine use (98.3%), indication (98.2%), name (94.4%) and possible side effects (94.3%); and the importance of providing leaflets with all medicines (87.5%). Fewer than 10% in Uganda would use internet based WMI, compared to between 20% and 55% elsewhere.Conclusion: Preferences for medicine information are similar across countries: verbal information is seen as most desirable, and the most wanted aspects of information are common internationally. Accessibility and understandability are key influences on preferred information sources. In-country regulations and practices should ensure that all medicine users can access the information necessary to maximise safe medicine use.Keywords: medicine information sources, patient information leaflets, patient preference, cross-country comparison, international surveyhttps://www.dovepress.com/patients-experiences-and-preferences-for-medicine-information-an-inter-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PPAmedicine information sourcespatient information leafletspatient preferencecross- country comparisoninternational survey
spellingShingle Nualdaisri P
Corlett SA
Akaso I
Katusiime B
Kitutu FE
Chua SS
Krska J
Patients’ Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and England
Patient Preference and Adherence
medicine information sources
patient information leaflets
patient preference
cross- country comparison
international survey
title Patients’ Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and England
title_full Patients’ Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and England
title_fullStr Patients’ Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and England
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and England
title_short Patients’ Experiences and Preferences for Medicine Information: An International Comparison Between Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and England
title_sort patients rsquo experiences and preferences for medicine information an international comparison between malaysia thailand uganda and england
topic medicine information sources
patient information leaflets
patient preference
cross- country comparison
international survey
url https://www.dovepress.com/patients-experiences-and-preferences-for-medicine-information-an-inter-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PPA
work_keys_str_mv AT nualdaisrip patientsrsquoexperiencesandpreferencesformedicineinformationaninternationalcomparisonbetweenmalaysiathailandugandaandengland
AT corlettsa patientsrsquoexperiencesandpreferencesformedicineinformationaninternationalcomparisonbetweenmalaysiathailandugandaandengland
AT akasoi patientsrsquoexperiencesandpreferencesformedicineinformationaninternationalcomparisonbetweenmalaysiathailandugandaandengland
AT katusiimeb patientsrsquoexperiencesandpreferencesformedicineinformationaninternationalcomparisonbetweenmalaysiathailandugandaandengland
AT kitutufe patientsrsquoexperiencesandpreferencesformedicineinformationaninternationalcomparisonbetweenmalaysiathailandugandaandengland
AT chuass patientsrsquoexperiencesandpreferencesformedicineinformationaninternationalcomparisonbetweenmalaysiathailandugandaandengland
AT krskaj patientsrsquoexperiencesandpreferencesformedicineinformationaninternationalcomparisonbetweenmalaysiathailandugandaandengland