Could Intermediate Screw in Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Save Motion Levels? Comparative Study between Long-Segment and Short-Segment with Intermediate Screw Fixation

Background Data: Thoracolumbar fractures are commonly managed by posterior pedicle screw fixation. Controversy about the number of levels involved in the fixation remains as the stability of the short-segment fixation remains questionable. Recently, it has been shown that application of intermediate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tarek ElHewala, Amr ElAdawy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Egyptian Spine Association 2019-04-01
Series:Egyptian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_43194.html
_version_ 1818406512209428480
author Tarek ElHewala
Amr ElAdawy
Amr ElAdawy
author_facet Tarek ElHewala
Amr ElAdawy
Amr ElAdawy
author_sort Tarek ElHewala
collection DOAJ
description Background Data: Thoracolumbar fractures are commonly managed by posterior pedicle screw fixation. Controversy about the number of levels involved in the fixation remains as the stability of the short-segment fixation remains questionable. Recently, it has been shown that application of intermediate screw in the fractured vertebra improves the biomechanical stability of the short-segment construct. Purpose: To compare the outcome of long-segment fixation (LSF) versus short-segment fixation with intermediate screws (SSFIS) in the management of the thoracolumbar burst fractures. Study Design: A prospective, nonrandomized clinical controlled trial. Patients and Methods: Fifty patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture (T11-L2) types A3 and A4 AOSpine classification with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) scale of more than 4 were treated between 2009 and 2014 with posterior pedicle screw fixation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the number of instrumented levels. Group 1 included 25 patients treated with LSF (two levels above and two levels below the fractured level) while Group 2 included 25 patients treated by SSFIS (one level above and one level below with 2 intermediate screws in the fractured level). The patients were evaluated for local kyphotic angle (LKA) correction and maintenance, anterior vertebral body height (AVH) compression, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain and treatment related complications. Construct failure was defined as screw pullout or instrument breakage. Results: The two groups were similar with regard to age, sex, fractured levels, fracture type, TLICS score, preoperative local kyphotic angle, and anterior vertebral body height compression. Postoperative correction of the local vertebral compression assessed with LKA and AVH significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperative degree. There was no significant difference in the two groups in early postoperative or follow-up regarding the degree of correction and its maintenance. No construct failure or major treatment related complication was encountered in both groups with significant reduction of VAS and ODI in both groups between early postoperative and late follow-up (13.5±2 months). Conclusion: Intermediate screw applied in the fractured level in management of thoracolumbar burst fracture improves the correction and maintenance of local kyphosis in short-segment fixation like long-segment construct with saving vertebral motion levels from being fixed. More randomized controlled and multicenter studies are needed to support these findings. (2019ESJ175)
first_indexed 2024-12-14T09:13:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e8fdf49fbcc4cda9527d5b449849fad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2314-8950
2314-8969
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T09:13:07Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Egyptian Spine Association
record_format Article
series Egyptian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-7e8fdf49fbcc4cda9527d5b449849fad2022-12-21T23:08:31ZengEgyptian Spine AssociationEgyptian Spine Journal2314-89502314-89692019-04-0130121110.21608/ESJ.2019.10129.1092Could Intermediate Screw in Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Save Motion Levels? Comparative Study between Long-Segment and Short-Segment with Intermediate Screw FixationTarek ElHewala0Amr ElAdawy1Amr ElAdawy2Orthopedic Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, ElSharkia, EgyptOrthopedic Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, ElSharkia, EgyptOrthopedic Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, ElSharkia, EgyptBackground Data: Thoracolumbar fractures are commonly managed by posterior pedicle screw fixation. Controversy about the number of levels involved in the fixation remains as the stability of the short-segment fixation remains questionable. Recently, it has been shown that application of intermediate screw in the fractured vertebra improves the biomechanical stability of the short-segment construct. Purpose: To compare the outcome of long-segment fixation (LSF) versus short-segment fixation with intermediate screws (SSFIS) in the management of the thoracolumbar burst fractures. Study Design: A prospective, nonrandomized clinical controlled trial. Patients and Methods: Fifty patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture (T11-L2) types A3 and A4 AOSpine classification with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) scale of more than 4 were treated between 2009 and 2014 with posterior pedicle screw fixation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the number of instrumented levels. Group 1 included 25 patients treated with LSF (two levels above and two levels below the fractured level) while Group 2 included 25 patients treated by SSFIS (one level above and one level below with 2 intermediate screws in the fractured level). The patients were evaluated for local kyphotic angle (LKA) correction and maintenance, anterior vertebral body height (AVH) compression, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain and treatment related complications. Construct failure was defined as screw pullout or instrument breakage. Results: The two groups were similar with regard to age, sex, fractured levels, fracture type, TLICS score, preoperative local kyphotic angle, and anterior vertebral body height compression. Postoperative correction of the local vertebral compression assessed with LKA and AVH significantly improved in both groups compared to the preoperative degree. There was no significant difference in the two groups in early postoperative or follow-up regarding the degree of correction and its maintenance. No construct failure or major treatment related complication was encountered in both groups with significant reduction of VAS and ODI in both groups between early postoperative and late follow-up (13.5±2 months). Conclusion: Intermediate screw applied in the fractured level in management of thoracolumbar burst fracture improves the correction and maintenance of local kyphosis in short-segment fixation like long-segment construct with saving vertebral motion levels from being fixed. More randomized controlled and multicenter studies are needed to support these findings. (2019ESJ175)https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_43194.htmlThoracolumbar fracturelong-segment fixationshort-segment fixationintermediate screwsburst fracture
spellingShingle Tarek ElHewala
Amr ElAdawy
Amr ElAdawy
Could Intermediate Screw in Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Save Motion Levels? Comparative Study between Long-Segment and Short-Segment with Intermediate Screw Fixation
Egyptian Spine Journal
Thoracolumbar fracture
long-segment fixation
short-segment fixation
intermediate screws
burst fracture
title Could Intermediate Screw in Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Save Motion Levels? Comparative Study between Long-Segment and Short-Segment with Intermediate Screw Fixation
title_full Could Intermediate Screw in Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Save Motion Levels? Comparative Study between Long-Segment and Short-Segment with Intermediate Screw Fixation
title_fullStr Could Intermediate Screw in Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Save Motion Levels? Comparative Study between Long-Segment and Short-Segment with Intermediate Screw Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Could Intermediate Screw in Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Save Motion Levels? Comparative Study between Long-Segment and Short-Segment with Intermediate Screw Fixation
title_short Could Intermediate Screw in Thoracolumbar Fracture Fixation Save Motion Levels? Comparative Study between Long-Segment and Short-Segment with Intermediate Screw Fixation
title_sort could intermediate screw in thoracolumbar fracture fixation save motion levels comparative study between long segment and short segment with intermediate screw fixation
topic Thoracolumbar fracture
long-segment fixation
short-segment fixation
intermediate screws
burst fracture
url https://esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_43194.html
work_keys_str_mv AT tarekelhewala couldintermediatescrewinthoracolumbarfracturefixationsavemotionlevelscomparativestudybetweenlongsegmentandshortsegmentwithintermediatescrewfixation
AT amreladawy couldintermediatescrewinthoracolumbarfracturefixationsavemotionlevelscomparativestudybetweenlongsegmentandshortsegmentwithintermediatescrewfixation
AT amreladawy couldintermediatescrewinthoracolumbarfracturefixationsavemotionlevelscomparativestudybetweenlongsegmentandshortsegmentwithintermediatescrewfixation