Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?

Abstract Purpose To present our experience and provide a literature review dissertation about the use of a suture-mediated percutaneous closure device (Perclose Proglide -PP- Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) to achieve hemostasis for unintended subclavian arterial catheterization during c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Discalzi, Claudio Maglia, Fernanda Ciferri, Andrea Mancini, Lorenzo Gibello, Marco Calandri, Gianfranco Varetto, Paolo Fonio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-05-01
Series:CVIR Endovascular
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00300-7
_version_ 1828228204534431744
author Andrea Discalzi
Claudio Maglia
Fernanda Ciferri
Andrea Mancini
Lorenzo Gibello
Marco Calandri
Gianfranco Varetto
Paolo Fonio
author_facet Andrea Discalzi
Claudio Maglia
Fernanda Ciferri
Andrea Mancini
Lorenzo Gibello
Marco Calandri
Gianfranco Varetto
Paolo Fonio
author_sort Andrea Discalzi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose To present our experience and provide a literature review dissertation about the use of a suture-mediated percutaneous closure device (Perclose Proglide -PP- Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) to achieve hemostasis for unintended subclavian arterial catheterization during central venous line placement. Materials & methods Since October 2020, we have successfully treated four consecutive patients with a central venous catheter (8 to 12 French) in the subclavian artery. In each patient, we released a PP, monitoring its efficacy by performing a subclavian angiogram and placing, as a rescue strategy, an 8 mm balloon catheter near the entry point of the misplaced catheter. Primary outcome is technical and clinical success. Technical success is defined as absence of bleeding signs at completion angiography, while clinical success is a composite endpoint defined as absence of hematoma, hemoglobin loss at 12 and 24 h, and absence of procedure-related reintervention (due to vessel stenosis, pseudoaneurysm or distal embolization). Results Technical success was obtained in 75% of cases. In one patient a mild extravasation was resolved after 3 min of balloon catheter inflation. No early complications were observed for all patients. Conclusions PP showed a safe and effective therapeutic option in case of unintentional arterial cannulation. It can be considered as first-line strategy, as it does not preclude the possibility to use other endovascular approaches in case of vascular closure device failure.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:18:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7e9d7124e3024d5eac820ce2c951ed57
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2520-8934
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:18:02Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series CVIR Endovascular
spelling doaj.art-7e9d7124e3024d5eac820ce2c951ed572022-12-22T03:21:32ZengSpringerOpenCVIR Endovascular2520-89342022-05-01511410.1186/s42155-022-00300-7Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?Andrea Discalzi0Claudio Maglia1Fernanda Ciferri2Andrea Mancini3Lorenzo Gibello4Marco Calandri5Gianfranco Varetto6Paolo Fonio7Department of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of TorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of TorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of TorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of TorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of TorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of TorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of TorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences Radiology unit, University of TorinoAbstract Purpose To present our experience and provide a literature review dissertation about the use of a suture-mediated percutaneous closure device (Perclose Proglide -PP- Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) to achieve hemostasis for unintended subclavian arterial catheterization during central venous line placement. Materials & methods Since October 2020, we have successfully treated four consecutive patients with a central venous catheter (8 to 12 French) in the subclavian artery. In each patient, we released a PP, monitoring its efficacy by performing a subclavian angiogram and placing, as a rescue strategy, an 8 mm balloon catheter near the entry point of the misplaced catheter. Primary outcome is technical and clinical success. Technical success is defined as absence of bleeding signs at completion angiography, while clinical success is a composite endpoint defined as absence of hematoma, hemoglobin loss at 12 and 24 h, and absence of procedure-related reintervention (due to vessel stenosis, pseudoaneurysm or distal embolization). Results Technical success was obtained in 75% of cases. In one patient a mild extravasation was resolved after 3 min of balloon catheter inflation. No early complications were observed for all patients. Conclusions PP showed a safe and effective therapeutic option in case of unintentional arterial cannulation. It can be considered as first-line strategy, as it does not preclude the possibility to use other endovascular approaches in case of vascular closure device failure.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00300-7Subclavian artery injuriesCentral venous catheterisationEndovascular repairVascular closure device, Perclose Proglide
spellingShingle Andrea Discalzi
Claudio Maglia
Fernanda Ciferri
Andrea Mancini
Lorenzo Gibello
Marco Calandri
Gianfranco Varetto
Paolo Fonio
Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?
CVIR Endovascular
Subclavian artery injuries
Central venous catheterisation
Endovascular repair
Vascular closure device, Perclose Proglide
title Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?
title_full Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?
title_fullStr Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?
title_short Percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization: time to change first line approach?
title_sort percutaneous closure of accidentally subclavian artery catheterization time to change first line approach
topic Subclavian artery injuries
Central venous catheterisation
Endovascular repair
Vascular closure device, Perclose Proglide
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00300-7
work_keys_str_mv AT andreadiscalzi percutaneousclosureofaccidentallysubclavianarterycatheterizationtimetochangefirstlineapproach
AT claudiomaglia percutaneousclosureofaccidentallysubclavianarterycatheterizationtimetochangefirstlineapproach
AT fernandaciferri percutaneousclosureofaccidentallysubclavianarterycatheterizationtimetochangefirstlineapproach
AT andreamancini percutaneousclosureofaccidentallysubclavianarterycatheterizationtimetochangefirstlineapproach
AT lorenzogibello percutaneousclosureofaccidentallysubclavianarterycatheterizationtimetochangefirstlineapproach
AT marcocalandri percutaneousclosureofaccidentallysubclavianarterycatheterizationtimetochangefirstlineapproach
AT gianfrancovaretto percutaneousclosureofaccidentallysubclavianarterycatheterizationtimetochangefirstlineapproach
AT paolofonio percutaneousclosureofaccidentallysubclavianarterycatheterizationtimetochangefirstlineapproach