Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologi
The author proposes a structural distinction between the petits récits and the grands récits (according to Lyotard), between binary and trivial narrativity, on one hand, and bifurcational and fatal narrativity, on the other: reversibility vs. irreversibility. The ontological implications of the two...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Danish |
| Published: |
Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift
1989-07-01
|
| Series: | Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/5377 |
| _version_ | 1797360734727831552 |
|---|---|
| author | Per Aage Brandt |
| author_facet | Per Aage Brandt |
| author_sort | Per Aage Brandt |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The author proposes a structural distinction between the petits récits and the grands récits (according to Lyotard), between binary and trivial narrativity, on one hand, and bifurcational and fatal narrativity, on the other: reversibility vs. irreversibility. The ontological implications of the two types are distinct, and philosophy should be aware of this categorical difference; narrative theology and “theo-semiotics” in general must do it, if the analysis is correct, as this development of actantial schematism makes it possible to represent, for the first time, a dynamic structure which could be called the geometry of religious meaning. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T15:43:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7e9e2b770af147a683c9bbd9c6a95afc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1904-8181 |
| language | Danish |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T15:43:57Z |
| publishDate | 1989-07-01 |
| publisher | Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift |
| spelling | doaj.art-7e9e2b770af147a683c9bbd9c6a95afc2024-01-09T13:45:32ZdanReligionsvidenskabeligt TidsskriftReligionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift1904-81811989-07-011410.7146/rt.v0i14.5377Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologiPer Aage BrandtThe author proposes a structural distinction between the petits récits and the grands récits (according to Lyotard), between binary and trivial narrativity, on one hand, and bifurcational and fatal narrativity, on the other: reversibility vs. irreversibility. The ontological implications of the two types are distinct, and philosophy should be aware of this categorical difference; narrative theology and “theo-semiotics” in general must do it, if the analysis is correct, as this development of actantial schematism makes it possible to represent, for the first time, a dynamic structure which could be called the geometry of religious meaning.https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/5377NarratologiDiegeseGenese |
| spellingShingle | Per Aage Brandt Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologi Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift Narratologi Diegese Genese |
| title | Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologi |
| title_full | Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologi |
| title_fullStr | Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologi |
| title_full_unstemmed | Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologi |
| title_short | Genese og diegese - et problem i den almene narratologi |
| title_sort | genese og diegese et problem i den almene narratologi |
| topic | Narratologi Diegese Genese |
| url | https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/5377 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT peraagebrandt geneseogdiegeseetproblemidenalmenenarratologi |