Evaluating Two Different Methods of Control Chest X-Ray in Patients with Chest Trauma

Background: Repeated physical examination and radiologic tests are necessary to prevent the complications in patients with thoracic injury. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-benefit of control chest x-ray (CXR) in these patients. Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, two groups...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gholamreza Mohajeri, Mohammad Ali Rajabi, Babak Naderi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2012-08-01
Series:مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Online Access:http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1636
_version_ 1797722563614343168
author Gholamreza Mohajeri
Mohammad Ali Rajabi
Babak Naderi
author_facet Gholamreza Mohajeri
Mohammad Ali Rajabi
Babak Naderi
author_sort Gholamreza Mohajeri
collection DOAJ
description Background: Repeated physical examination and radiologic tests are necessary to prevent the complications in patients with thoracic injury. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-benefit of control chest x-ray (CXR) in these patients. Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, two groups of patients with chest trauma were evaluated. In one group, the control CXR every 6 hours was prepared and in the other group, repeated physical examination every 6 hours with only one CXR after 24 hours from admission was done. The patients had blunt or stab chest trauma without pneumothorax or hemothorax in first CXR. Data of age, sex, pneumothorax (simple or tension), hemothorax, lung contusion, hospital stay, mortality and homodynamic abnormality were collected and analyzed using chi-square test at the meaningful level of P < 0.05. Findings: Of 196 patients with mean of age 37.16 ± 17.59 years, 78% were men. There was not any tension pneumothorax or hemodynamic abnormality in two groups. Frequency of simple pneumothorax and hemodynamic abnormality was not different between the two groups (P = 0.39 and P = 1, respectively). It was possible to diagnose pneumothorax with serial physical examination in all patients (3 patients). Conclusion: In patients with chest trauma, repeated CXR can be replaced by repeated physical examination during first 24 hours. Keywords: Thoracic injury, Chest x-ray, Complication
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:49:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ea447fc97cb4598bff1838aa2830e92
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-7595
1735-854X
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:49:09Z
publishDate 2012-08-01
publisher Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
spelling doaj.art-7ea447fc97cb4598bff1838aa2830e922023-09-02T12:39:48ZfasIsfahan University of Medical Sciencesمجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان1027-75951735-854X2012-08-01301921079Evaluating Two Different Methods of Control Chest X-Ray in Patients with Chest TraumaGholamreza Mohajeri0Mohammad Ali Rajabi1Babak Naderi2Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssociate Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranResident, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine And Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranBackground: Repeated physical examination and radiologic tests are necessary to prevent the complications in patients with thoracic injury. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-benefit of control chest x-ray (CXR) in these patients. Methods: In this prospective clinical trial, two groups of patients with chest trauma were evaluated. In one group, the control CXR every 6 hours was prepared and in the other group, repeated physical examination every 6 hours with only one CXR after 24 hours from admission was done. The patients had blunt or stab chest trauma without pneumothorax or hemothorax in first CXR. Data of age, sex, pneumothorax (simple or tension), hemothorax, lung contusion, hospital stay, mortality and homodynamic abnormality were collected and analyzed using chi-square test at the meaningful level of P < 0.05. Findings: Of 196 patients with mean of age 37.16 ± 17.59 years, 78% were men. There was not any tension pneumothorax or hemodynamic abnormality in two groups. Frequency of simple pneumothorax and hemodynamic abnormality was not different between the two groups (P = 0.39 and P = 1, respectively). It was possible to diagnose pneumothorax with serial physical examination in all patients (3 patients). Conclusion: In patients with chest trauma, repeated CXR can be replaced by repeated physical examination during first 24 hours. Keywords: Thoracic injury, Chest x-ray, Complicationhttp://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1636
spellingShingle Gholamreza Mohajeri
Mohammad Ali Rajabi
Babak Naderi
Evaluating Two Different Methods of Control Chest X-Ray in Patients with Chest Trauma
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
title Evaluating Two Different Methods of Control Chest X-Ray in Patients with Chest Trauma
title_full Evaluating Two Different Methods of Control Chest X-Ray in Patients with Chest Trauma
title_fullStr Evaluating Two Different Methods of Control Chest X-Ray in Patients with Chest Trauma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Two Different Methods of Control Chest X-Ray in Patients with Chest Trauma
title_short Evaluating Two Different Methods of Control Chest X-Ray in Patients with Chest Trauma
title_sort evaluating two different methods of control chest x ray in patients with chest trauma
url http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1636
work_keys_str_mv AT gholamrezamohajeri evaluatingtwodifferentmethodsofcontrolchestxrayinpatientswithchesttrauma
AT mohammadalirajabi evaluatingtwodifferentmethodsofcontrolchestxrayinpatientswithchesttrauma
AT babaknaderi evaluatingtwodifferentmethodsofcontrolchestxrayinpatientswithchesttrauma