Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trial

Background and objectives: Airway obstruction and respiratory compromise are frequently encountered complications of cleft palate (CP) repair. We compared the analgesic efficacy of bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (SMB) versus palatal block (PB) in pediatric patients undergoing CP repa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed M. Abu Elyazed, Shaimaa F. Mostafa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-07-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111018491830028X
_version_ 1811270616817336320
author Mohamed M. Abu Elyazed
Shaimaa F. Mostafa
author_facet Mohamed M. Abu Elyazed
Shaimaa F. Mostafa
author_sort Mohamed M. Abu Elyazed
collection DOAJ
description Background and objectives: Airway obstruction and respiratory compromise are frequently encountered complications of cleft palate (CP) repair. We compared the analgesic efficacy of bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (SMB) versus palatal block (PB) in pediatric patients undergoing CP repair. Methods: 90 patients aged 3–24 months were allocated into three groups: Control group (C): patients received general anesthesia only. Maxillary block group (M): patients received ultrasound-guided bilateral SMB using 0.15 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. Palatal block group (P): 0.5 ml bupivacaine 0.25% was injected bilaterally at greater, lesser and nasopalatine foraminae. CHIPPS score, rescue analgesic consumption and time till tolerance of oral feed were assessed. Results: On admission to PACU till 8 h postoperative, CHIPPS score was lower in M and P groups compared to C group. At 6 h and 8 h, CHIPPS score was lower in M group compared to P group. Postoperative rescue analgesic consumption was decreased in M and P groups (0.72 ± 2.22 mg) and (3.73 ± 5.92 mg) compared to C group (8.07 ± 5.47 mg) with significantly lower values in M group compared to P group. Time to first request of rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in M and P groups (482.50 ± 38.62 min) and (260.00 ± 31.62 min) compared to C group (79.71 ± 30.34 min). Time to feed was lower in M and P groups compared to C group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided bilateral SMB provided better postoperative analgesia and decreased rescue analgesic consumption and time to tolerate oral feeding compared to PB without increased side effects. Keywords: Cleft palate, Maxillary, Postoperative pain
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:05:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ec2bef20fd84fbe8e8ba03eaf3f29ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-1849
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:05:18Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-7ec2bef20fd84fbe8e8ba03eaf3f29ee2022-12-22T03:14:57ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEgyptian Journal of Anaesthesia1110-18492018-07-013438388Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trialMohamed M. Abu Elyazed0Shaimaa F. Mostafa1Department of Anesthesia and Surgical ICU, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, EgyptCorresponding author at Moheb Street, Almahalla Alkobra, Egypt.; Department of Anesthesia and Surgical ICU, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, EgyptBackground and objectives: Airway obstruction and respiratory compromise are frequently encountered complications of cleft palate (CP) repair. We compared the analgesic efficacy of bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (SMB) versus palatal block (PB) in pediatric patients undergoing CP repair. Methods: 90 patients aged 3–24 months were allocated into three groups: Control group (C): patients received general anesthesia only. Maxillary block group (M): patients received ultrasound-guided bilateral SMB using 0.15 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. Palatal block group (P): 0.5 ml bupivacaine 0.25% was injected bilaterally at greater, lesser and nasopalatine foraminae. CHIPPS score, rescue analgesic consumption and time till tolerance of oral feed were assessed. Results: On admission to PACU till 8 h postoperative, CHIPPS score was lower in M and P groups compared to C group. At 6 h and 8 h, CHIPPS score was lower in M group compared to P group. Postoperative rescue analgesic consumption was decreased in M and P groups (0.72 ± 2.22 mg) and (3.73 ± 5.92 mg) compared to C group (8.07 ± 5.47 mg) with significantly lower values in M group compared to P group. Time to first request of rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in M and P groups (482.50 ± 38.62 min) and (260.00 ± 31.62 min) compared to C group (79.71 ± 30.34 min). Time to feed was lower in M and P groups compared to C group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided bilateral SMB provided better postoperative analgesia and decreased rescue analgesic consumption and time to tolerate oral feeding compared to PB without increased side effects. Keywords: Cleft palate, Maxillary, Postoperative painhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111018491830028X
spellingShingle Mohamed M. Abu Elyazed
Shaimaa F. Mostafa
Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trial
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
title Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children a randomized controlled trial
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111018491830028X
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedmabuelyazed bilateralsuprazygomaticmaxillarynerveblockversuspalatalblockforcleftpalaterepairinchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shaimaafmostafa bilateralsuprazygomaticmaxillarynerveblockversuspalatalblockforcleftpalaterepairinchildrenarandomizedcontrolledtrial