Freedom to Conduct Business During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Unprecedented restrictions on various human rights were applied during the COVID-19 pandemic, and considered crucial in most cases to halt the spread of infection. Yet, a number of critical issues were raised concerning the scope and proportionality of said restrictions. Among these, the freedom to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dalia Vasarienė, Lyra Jakulevičienė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-12-01
Series:Tilburg Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tilburglawreview.com/articles/246
_version_ 1798022386765791232
author Dalia Vasarienė
Lyra Jakulevičienė
author_facet Dalia Vasarienė
Lyra Jakulevičienė
author_sort Dalia Vasarienė
collection DOAJ
description Unprecedented restrictions on various human rights were applied during the COVID-19 pandemic, and considered crucial in most cases to halt the spread of infection. Yet, a number of critical issues were raised concerning the scope and proportionality of said restrictions. Among these, the freedom to conduct business was one of the most affected by measures implemented in the first lockdown which was applied in many Member States of the European Union. This article analyzes the protection of this freedom in situations of emergency, its conflict with the right to health, and explores whether jurisprudential and doctrinal bases applicable before the pandemic could be applied or if new principles need to be developed to address unprecedented situations like COVID-19. The criteria to determine the proportionality of these restrictions from the perspective of International and EU human rights law are also discussed. The authors argue that the freedom to conduct business, although not envisaged directly in the European Convention on Human Rights, is part of the right to property, and thus should be protected in the same manner. Based on that, the approach to the deprivation of the right to use property and denial of the essence of the freedom to conduct business should be applied similarly, though not identically, to the approach ofde factoexpropriation, where a question of full or partial compensation may be relevant in case of substantial business losses. For other restrictions the availability of compensatory measures should be one of the key aspects while considering the proportionality of COVID-19 measures in restricting the rights of individuals or businesses.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:28:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ef94949d9524eeaaaa3f0463b108da5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2211-2545
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:28:58Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Tilburg Law Review
spelling doaj.art-7ef94949d9524eeaaaa3f0463b108da52022-12-22T04:12:13ZengUbiquity PressTilburg Law Review2211-25452021-12-0126110.5334/tilr.246174Freedom to Conduct Business During the Covid-19 PandemicDalia Vasarienė0Lyra Jakulevičienė1Associate Professor, Mykolas Romeris University, VilniusProfessor, Mykolas Romeris University, VilniusUnprecedented restrictions on various human rights were applied during the COVID-19 pandemic, and considered crucial in most cases to halt the spread of infection. Yet, a number of critical issues were raised concerning the scope and proportionality of said restrictions. Among these, the freedom to conduct business was one of the most affected by measures implemented in the first lockdown which was applied in many Member States of the European Union. This article analyzes the protection of this freedom in situations of emergency, its conflict with the right to health, and explores whether jurisprudential and doctrinal bases applicable before the pandemic could be applied or if new principles need to be developed to address unprecedented situations like COVID-19. The criteria to determine the proportionality of these restrictions from the perspective of International and EU human rights law are also discussed. The authors argue that the freedom to conduct business, although not envisaged directly in the European Convention on Human Rights, is part of the right to property, and thus should be protected in the same manner. Based on that, the approach to the deprivation of the right to use property and denial of the essence of the freedom to conduct business should be applied similarly, though not identically, to the approach ofde factoexpropriation, where a question of full or partial compensation may be relevant in case of substantial business losses. For other restrictions the availability of compensatory measures should be one of the key aspects while considering the proportionality of COVID-19 measures in restricting the rights of individuals or businesses.https://tilburglawreview.com/articles/246freedom to conduct a businessemergency situationcovid-19 measureshuman rights restrictionsproportionality of restrictionsright to healthright to property
spellingShingle Dalia Vasarienė
Lyra Jakulevičienė
Freedom to Conduct Business During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Tilburg Law Review
freedom to conduct a business
emergency situation
covid-19 measures
human rights restrictions
proportionality of restrictions
right to health
right to property
title Freedom to Conduct Business During the Covid-19 Pandemic
title_full Freedom to Conduct Business During the Covid-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Freedom to Conduct Business During the Covid-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Freedom to Conduct Business During the Covid-19 Pandemic
title_short Freedom to Conduct Business During the Covid-19 Pandemic
title_sort freedom to conduct business during the covid 19 pandemic
topic freedom to conduct a business
emergency situation
covid-19 measures
human rights restrictions
proportionality of restrictions
right to health
right to property
url https://tilburglawreview.com/articles/246
work_keys_str_mv AT daliavasariene freedomtoconductbusinessduringthecovid19pandemic
AT lyrajakuleviciene freedomtoconductbusinessduringthecovid19pandemic